Why Your Child Ignores All Those Expensive Learning Toys (And What To Try Instead)
I’m on my knees digging through the back of our entryway play closet last Saturday, brushing past a crumpled pack of half-eaten fruit snacks and a sock the dog hid three months ago, when my shoulder hits a hard cardboard box. I pull it out, and it’s full of the learning toys I’ve bought in the last year that my 4-year-old son Leo has never once touched. The $60 light-up alphabet magnetic puzzle, still in its slightly crushed plastic. The talking shape-sorting robot I ordered after seeing a TikTok about preschool readiness. The set of counting cookies that promise to teach one-to-one correspondence (I Googled that term after I bought them, just to be sure I was getting my money’s worth). All of them have barely a scuff on them. Leo did steal the empty cookie tin to hide his rock collection in, though. That’s the only use any of these toys have gotten.
I remember unboxing each one, setting it on the kitchen table after dinner, and waiting for the magic. I’d say “Look what I got you!” and Leo would glance over, take one piece out, then run off to chase the cat or dig in the junk drawer for rubber bands. I’d put it back on the shelf, tell myself I’d try again tomorrow, and a week later I’d forget it existed. I started to wonder what was wrong—was I picking the wrong toys? Was Leo not interested in learning? Did I need to spend more to get something that would hold his attention?
Last month I brought this up at a playdate at my friend Sarah’s house. Sarah’s been a lead preschool teacher for 12 years, and she just laughed when I showed her my Amazon cart full of new fine motor learning toys. She pointed to her own playroom, where a group of 4-year-olds were all clustered around a pile of empty cardboard boxes and a roll of masking tape, ignoring the fancy learning kitchen in the corner. “I see this every single week,” she said. “Parents spend hundreds on toys that are supposed to teach this or that, but they’re all built to be played with one right way. Kids don’t play like that. They want to make stuff their own.”
That hit me. I started paying attention to what Leo actually plays with for more than 10 minutes a day, every day. It’s never the toys that say “educational” on the box. He spends 20 minutes every morning lining up his 27 matchbox cars by color, then by size, then by how fast they go down the ramp on the front step. He helps me unload the dishwasher and counts every spoon out loud as he puts them in the drawer. He collects acorns from the oak tree in our front yard, then hides them in different potted plants around the house and makes me help him find them. All that time I was stressing that he wasn’t getting enough learning in, he was already doing sorting, counting, problem solving, storytelling—all the things those expensive toys were designed to teach. I just didn’t count it as learning because it didn’t come in a branded box.
I started making small, low-effort changes after that, and they’ve worked way better than any toy I’ve ever bought. First, before I add anything to my Amazon cart now, I write down what Leo already plays with every day, and see if I can expand on that instead of buying something new. He loves collecting rocks? I spent $2 on a cheap plastic sorting tray from the dollar store instead of a $30 wooden sorting toy. He loves measuring things with my old tape measure? I printed out a big piece of paper and taped it to the wall so he can mark how tall his stuffed animals are. It’s all way cheaper, and he cares way more.
Second, I packed all the ignored learning toys I already owned into that big box and stuck it in the back of the attic. Now I bring one out every few weeks when Leo says he’s bored, and I just leave it on the coffee table. I don’t say anything, I don’t force him to play with it, I don’t explain what it’s for. Last month I brought out the alphabet puzzle, and he pulled it out while I was making lunch. He didn’t do the “right” activity of matching all the letters to the board—he just pulled out the L and the E and the O and stuck them on the fridge to spell his name, then used the extra letters to make names for all his stuffed animals. He played with it for 15 minutes, which is 15 minutes more than he ever played with it when I was shoving it at him. If he doesn’t touch it after a day, I just put it back in the box. No harm done.
Third, I stopped reserving “learning time” for toys. I just let Leo join me when I’m doing regular stuff. Let him sort the laundry by color before I put it in the washer. Let him count the apples I put in the grocery cart. Let him draw on the empty side of the grocery list with a crayon. All of these things take zero extra planning, and he’s way more engaged than he ever was with a toy that beeps at him to get the answer right.
I still get the ads in my Instagram feed, and I still feel that little twinge of guilt sometimes, like I’m not doing enough to give Leo a head start. I still almost add a fancy new learning toy to my cart once a month, before I remember the box in the attic. Last week I watched him sort his acorns into big, medium, and small piles, then count each pile out loud to his stuffed rabbit. He got to 17 before he got distracted and threw one at the dog. That’s more learning than he ever would have gotten from the counting cookies sitting in my closet. I’m dropping that box off at the thrift store next week. Some things work for some kids, I guess, just none of them worked for mine. I’m fine with that. For now, we’ve got acorns, matchbox cars, and empty cardboard boxes. That’s more than enough learning for us.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Your Child Ignores All Those Expensive Learning Toys (And What To Try Instead)