Why 94% of New Jobs Went to Women – and What That Means for Our Sons
At the school district’s annual career night, I was standing by the registration table when a father I knew slightly—let’s call him Mark—walked over with a crumpled printout. He’d been reading the local paper, he said, and couldn’t make sense of a statistic. Between March 25 and July 26, roughly 350,000 new jobs were added to the economy. Ninety-four percent of them went to women. He looked at the paper, then at me. “My son is in fifth grade. What am I supposed to tell him?”
I didn’t have a ready answer. I’m a teacher, not an economist, but I’ve spent enough years in a classroom to notice patterns that don’t show up in labor reports. And that night, as the robot club kids shuffled past with their soldering irons and the coding workshop filled up with girls, I started thinking about what that number actually means for the families I work with.
It’s easy to make a joke out of it—another crisis, another political brawl. But Mark’s question wasn’t about the culture war. It was about his son. He wanted to know if his kid was being left behind, and honestly, I think that’s the question every parent and teacher should be asking, without turning it into a panic.
Here’s what I see in my classroom. The girls, on average, are more likely to raise their hands when they’re confused. They’re comfortable saying “I need help” or “Can you explain that again?” They form study groups without being asked. The boys, by high school, have often learned the opposite: that struggling quietly looks more confident. It’s not that they’re less capable—it’s that they’re less willing to show uncertainty.
That difference doesn’t come from nowhere. We still, without meaning to, praise boys for being independent and girls for being collaborative. A boy who finishes his worksheet quickly is “sharp”; a girl who finishes hers and asks who else is done is “helpful.” By the time they enter the job market, those small labels have hardened into habits.
Researchers might call it “soft skills” or “emotional intelligence,” but I’d rather describe it like this: the jobs that are growing right now—health care, education, human services, anything involving client relationships—run on talking, listening, and adjusting. That doesn’t mean women are naturally better at those things. It means girls are more often encouraged to practice them, and boys are more often told to “figure it out themselves.”
When Mark’s son gets to the workforce, he’ll need to know how to ask for help, how to work on a team, how to apologize when he’s wrong. Those aren’t genetic traits. They’re learned skills. And they can be taught at home and at school, if we resist the urge to make everything about gender politics.
So what can parents actually do? Not the grand gestures, but the everyday things.
Talk about jobs out loud, without gender roles attached. When you’re at dinner and someone mentions a good job opportunity, don’t say “women’s work” or “man’s work.” Say “that job pays well” or “that requires a lot of patient listening.” Let your son hear you neighbor’s story about becoming a nurse, not just a pilot. Let your daughter hear about the guy who runs the logistics company.
Teach negotiation at the dinner table. Ask your kid what they want for dinner, and when they say “pizza,” ask them to convince you. Why pizza? What else goes with pizza? What’s the budget? That might sound silly, but it’s practicing for a job interview where you have to pitch a project or ask for a raise. Girls get plenty of practice with “please.” Boys get plenty of practice with “I’ll do it alone.” Both need the other half.
In the classroom, I’ve started making one small change. When a student is stuck, I don’t immediately swoop in with the answer. I say, “Who in this room has an idea for how to help?” The boys often look around, surprised. The girls, because they’ve been doing this for years, start talking. After a few weeks, the boys start asking for help too—not because they’re suddenly weaker, but because they’re allowed to see that asking is one of the skills.
As for politicians, Mark’s question was partly about them. “What are they doing about this?” he asked. I told him I wasn’t sure anyone in Washington has even read that statistic the way he did. The political fight is usually about who should get the blame, not about how to prepare kids for the jobs that are coming. And to be honest, waiting for a politician to make your son feel capable is like waiting for a thunderstorm to water your garden. It might happen, but you shouldn’t hold off on watering yourself.
What I told Mark that night was simpler than he expected. I said: “Your son is in fifth grade. He still thinks you know everything. That gives you about seven years to teach him that being strong doesn’t mean never asking for directions.” He laughed, because it’s an old joke. But jokes stick because they’re true.
The job market will keep shifting. The statistic from March to July will be replaced by another one, and someone will spin it for an election. But what we do in our kitchens and classrooms—the small moments where we push a boy to explain his thinking or let a girl solve the problem without jumping in—that’s not in any political platform. It’s just parenting. It’s just teaching. It’s just the slow, unglamorous work of raising people who can navigate a world we can’t fully predict.
I haven’t seen Mark since career night. But his printout is still on my desk, folded around a paper clip. I keep it because it reminds me that most parents aren’t looking for a crisis. They’re looking for a handle. And the handle isn’t in the data—it’s in the next conversation with their son, when they ask, “So what do you think you’d be good at?” and try to actually listen to the answer.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why 94% of New Jobs Went to Women – and What That Means for Our Sons