What the NYC Public School AI Ban Means for Parents (and 3 Practical Things You Can Do At Home)
Last Wednesday, I pulled up to the 10th grade entrance at Brooklyn Technical High School in a drizzle, my iced latte leaking through the paper cup into my cup holder. My daughter Lila was leaning against the chain link fence, hood up, scrolling her personal hotspot—she already knew the news. The city Department of Education had rolled out its full ban on AI tools like ChatGPT and Gemini on all school wifi and devices that morning. A kid in her history class got caught turning in a full AI-written essay the week before, and the district flipped the switch overnight.
“Remember when Ms. Henderson had us use ChatGPT to brainstorm our argumentative essay topics back in September?” she said, climbing into the car and wiping rain off her boots on my floor mat. “Now we can’t even pull it up to check grammar. It’s all blocked.”
I sub at a K-8 elementary school a few blocks from our house, so I’d already seen the rollout trickle down. Two days before the ban hit my daughter’s high school, I was covering a 5th grade poetry class, and the regular teacher had left a lesson plan that included letting kids use AI to generate a first draft if they got stuck putting their ideas on paper. By the time I got there, admin had sent out an email saying all AI sites were blocked, and any use of AI on assignments would count as cheating.
There was one boy in that class, Javi, who rarely turns in any writing assignment because he struggles to organize his thoughts fast enough to keep up with the class. Last month, he’d used that same AI trick to draft a 12-stanza poem about going to his grandma’s house in Puerto Rico, then rewrote every line in his own voice, and he read it out loud to the whole class. That day, after the ban, he just stared at a blank page for 45 minutes, twisting his hoodie string until the bell rang. When I asked him if he wanted to talk through an idea, he just shrugged and said “what’s the point, I can’t get it right anyway.”
I get why the ban exists. Teachers are already stretched thinner than ever, they don’t have time to run every student essay through an AI detector, and no one wants kids to graduate without knowing how to string together a clear paragraph on their own. But cutting off all access entirely feels like turning off the whole internet because someone once plagiarized a report from Wikipedia. It’s a blunt fix for a problem that requires actually teaching kids how to use the tool, not erase it from their classrooms.
Two nights after the ban went into effect, Lila got frustrated trying to sort 20 rows of pH test data for her science fair project. She’d learned to use an AI tool to organize messy data in after-school coding club, but couldn’t access it at school, and forgot to finish the work before that night. We ordered a chocolate chip cookie from the shop down the street, sat down at the kitchen table, and worked out our own system to work with the school’s ban, instead of against it. It’s simple, and other parents I’ve shared it with have had luck with it too.
First, we split homework tasks into two clear categories: AI-allowed and AI-not-allowed. Prep work like brainstorming topics, sorting raw data, fixing grammar typos, or summarizing a long academic reading she doesn’t have time to get through word-for-word is allowed. Writing a full essay from start to finish, answering homework questions that are meant to test her knowledge, or solving math problems that require showing your work is not allowed. If she wants to use AI to check her answer after she’s done it on her own, that’s fine, but she can’t use it to get the answer first.
Second, we made a rule that if she uses AI for any part of an assignment, she adds one clear line at the bottom that says exactly what she used it for. Something like “ChatGPT helped me organize my data tables. I did all the analysis and writing myself.” Most teachers I’ve talked to don’t actually care if kids use AI for prep work—they just care that kids are honest and doing the core learning themselves. Disclosing up front takes the pressure off, and avoids a surprise cheating penalty that can tank a kid’s grade over something small.
For parents of younger kids, whose schools also enforce the ban, I suggest turning AI into a low-stakes game at home instead of a homework tool. If your kid is writing a report on dinosaurs or the solar system, ask AI to write a short 3-paragraph version of the report with three intentional wrong facts. Then have your kid find the wrong facts and correct them using their own research. It gets them practicing critical thinking and research skills, it feels like a game instead of extra work, and you don’t have to worry about them relying on AI to do their work for them.
I talked to Lila’s English teacher after school last week, and she told me she agrees that cheating is a real problem, but she wishes the district had given teachers a month of training to work out AI guidelines before just blocking all access. She still accepts work where kids disclose AI use for prep, as long as the final work is their own.
A lot of parents I know are fully for the ban or fully against it, but I’m somewhere in the middle. The ban is what it is right now; we don’t get to rewrite district policy overnight. All we can do is fill the gap at home, teach our kids how to use the tool responsibly, instead of pretending it doesn’t exist.
Lila turned in her science fair project last night, with her disclosure line at the bottom. Javi ended up writing a short paragraph about his soccer practice that day in poetry class, and turned that in instead—it wasn’t as long as his grandma poem, but it was his. We’re still figuring this out. The policy will probably change again in six months or a year, when the district works out what they actually want to do. For now, we’re just taking it one assignment at a time.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What the NYC Public School AI Ban Means for Parents (and 3 Practical Things You Can Do At Home)