Translation Tools for Educators: What Works (And What Doesn’t) For My Multilingual Classroom
It was 8:15 on a Tuesday, and I was leaning over the desk of my new third grader Lila, who’d moved to Portland from Bogotá two days prior. She’d pulled out a crumpled colored drawing of a woman standing next to a wooden boat, and said something rapid in Spanish I couldn’t parse. I fumbled my phone out of my apron pocket, opened Google Translate, and held it up to her to repeat herself.
The text popped up half a second later: My grandmother is dead in the river.
I froze, grabbed a pack of extra tissues I keep by my desk for scraped knees and bad test days, and patted her shoulder. Lila shook her head hard, talked faster, and flipped the drawing over to show me the loaves of bread scribbled in the corner. I re-listened to the voice transcript, and realized the app had misheard “vende pan en el río” — my grandmother sells bread by the river — as something entirely different. We both laughed once we figured it out, but that mistake stuck with me.
I’ve been teaching third grade at this Title I school for seven years, and right now 42% of my students speak a first language other than English. We have kids from Vietnam, the Marshall Islands, Guatemala, Japan, and Syria, spread across six different home languages I don’t speak a word of. For years I got by on the free version of Google Translate, broken charades, and the part-time district interpreter who only comes to our building twice a week. But that morning with Lila made me test out every translation tool I could get my hands on, to see what actually holds up for daily classroom use.
Google Translate still lives on my phone’s home screen, but I only use it for quick, simple checks now. If a kid points to their throat and I can’t tell if they’re saying they’re hungry or sick, I’ll pull it up for a one-word or short phrase check. I just don’t trust the voice-to-voice feature for anything longer than that, and I never use the camera feature for handwritten notes, because it misreads messy kid handwriting 9 times out of 10. The biggest trick I’ve learned is to always ask the kid to point or show me what they’re talking about after I get a translation, to catch the big mistakes before they happen.
For any written communication — permission slips, weekly newsletters, progress report notes to parents — I use DeepL. I found it two years ago, after Google Translate turned “pumpkin patch field trip” into “pumpkin testing spot” on my fall newsletter, and three parents emailed me asking if they needed to bring proof of vaccination. DeepL gets context way better than Google, even for idioms or phrases that don’t translate directly. The free version lets you translate documents up to 5,000 words, which is more than enough for anything I send home. My school covers the $10 a month for the paid version for all teachers, which lets you translate longer documents and save your translation history, but I could get by just fine on the free one if I had to. For parents who need to communicate with me, I tell them to type their message in their home language, run it through DeepL, and paste it into the email — it’s way more accurate than Google for longer messages, and I can translate any response back if they need it.
For ongoing one-on-one check-ins with new students, I use Microsoft Translator’s free split-screen feature on a classroom tablet. Akira, my Japanese student who joined us last semester, keeps it pulled up when he’s still unsure of his English. He types his question or comment in Japanese on his side, I see it in English on mine, and I reply in English that he sees in Japanese. Last month, he was clutching his hand after recess, and we sorted out that he had a small itch from poison oak, not a broken bone, in two minutes — no running down to the office to wait for the district interpreter, no panic. It’s not a replacement for learning English, but it lets kids participate and ask for what they need while they’re still building their vocabulary.
I’ve tried a few expensive tools marketed specifically to schools, and most of them aren’t worth the cost. One app wanted $499 a year per teacher for “education-specific translation” and it made the same kind of mistakes Google does, just with a nicer interface. I also don’t use any tools that claim to automatically translate live whole-class lessons. I tried that during hybrid learning, and it lagged so badly that half the lesson was unreadable, and the mistakes confused the kids more than no translation at all. I always save serious conversations — like talks about behavior or mental health — for a professional human interpreter, no exceptions. Translation tools are for daily, routine communication, not high-stakes conversations.
Last week, Lila brought a loaf of her grandma’s bread into class to share. She stood at the front of the room, practiced her line for a full minute before saying, “My grandma make bread. By river.” We all clapped, and the bread was still warm when I ate my slice after school.
I still mess up sometimes. Two weeks ago, I used Google to quickly translate a note for a Vietnamese parent, and it turned out I wrote that her son was “gaining too much weight” instead of “gaining confidence” in reading. We laughed it out once we sorted it out with DeepL a day later. It’s not a perfect system, and I’m still trying new tools when other teachers send me recommendations. But right now, this mix of free, low-cost tools works better than anything else I’ve tried, and it lets me make space for every kid in my class, even when I don’t speak their language.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Translation Tools for Educators: What Works (And What Doesn’t) For My Multilingual Classroom