Are State Math Standards Designed for Failure? A Teacher’s Honest Take + Practical Tips for Parents
Last Tuesday, I sat across from 10-year-old Leo at my kitchen table, half-eaten Goldfish crackers scattered between our notebooks, as he stared at his 4th grade math homework. He’d just multiplied 12 by 18, gotten 216, and then erased the whole thing, his eraser leaving a gray smudge on the lined paper. “What’s wrong?” I asked. He sighed, twirling his pencil between his fingers. “My teacher says we have to show three different strategies for every problem. I know how to get the answer, but I can’t remember what the other two strategies are called. I’m gonna fail this worksheet.”
Leo’s mom texted me later that night, frustrated, after she’d looked up our state’s 4th grade math standards to figure out what was going on. “Why does he need three strategies to get one right answer? Why are we doing fractions this hard in 4th grade? Is this whole thing just designed to make kids fail?” It’s a question I get at least once a month from parents, and after 12 years working as a public elementary math teacher and tutor, I get why they ask. I’ve seen three different overhauls of our state math standards in that time. Each time, the state department of education says the new standards will fix low test scores, get kids ready for college, and close achievement gaps. Each time, I end the school year looking at a class where 40% haven’t mastered half the grade level standards, and more kids than the year before say they hate math.
Last year, I was long-term subbing in a 5th grade classroom, and our district’s pacing guide required us to cover 12 standards in 9 weeks. Half my class still couldn’t do multi-digit multiplication fluently, but I had to move on to dividing fractions anyway, because that’s what the standards map said was next. When I asked my principal if I could take an extra week to fill in the gaps, she just shook her head. “If we don’t hit all the standards by testing season, our school’s performance rating drops, and we lose Title I funding. It’s not my call to slow down.”
So are state math standards intentionally designed for failure? No, I don’t think that’s the case. Most of the people writing them are teachers and researchers who want kids to learn math well. But the way they’re structured right now, they have two built-in flaws that almost guarantee a high number of kids will struggle and fail. First, they assume every kid develops math skills at the exact same pace, on the exact same timeline set by the state. We’ve known for decades that’s not true—some kids are ready for abstract fraction work at 9, some aren’t ready until 11. But the standards don’t leave room for that natural variation. Second, they’re built around standardized testing, not actual learning. Every standard has to be easy to write a multiple-choice question for, so you get all those requirements for multiple strategies and convoluted word problems that don’t actually test whether a kid understands math, just whether they can jump through the right hoop for the test.
That doesn’t mean you have to fight the whole system from your living room, though. There are small, concrete things you can do to keep your kid from getting crushed by the pace.
First, if your kid comes home stressed because their homework requires multiple strategies or advanced content they haven’t mastered, let them do it their way first. If they can get the right answer with one strategy that makes sense to them, that’s good enough. Just write a quick note to the teacher that says “My child practiced this skill at home, we focused on getting the answer correct rather than meeting the strategy requirement.” Nine times out of 10, the teacher will be relieved, because they don’t love the requirement either. Most are just following the rules they’re given.
Second, if your kid is below grade level according to the standards, don’t try to cram all the grade level content to catch up. Instead, pick one core gap to work on for 10 minutes a day, four days a week. If your 5th grader struggles with dividing fractions because they never mastered multiplication facts, do five quick multiplication fact practice problems after dinner every night, instead of fighting for an hour over dividing fractions homework they can’t do without that base. The state’s timeline isn’t your kid’s timeline, and filling in one small gap is way more useful than checking off a bunch of standards they don’t actually understand.
Third, email your kid’s teacher once at the start of the year and ask this exact question: “What’s one core skill my kid needs to master this year to be ready for next, regardless of the pacing?” Most teachers know that only about half of the grade level standards are actually critical for the next year, and the rest are just checked off for testing. They’ll tell you what to prioritize, so you don’t waste time stressing over the stuff that doesn’t actually matter long term.
Last week, Leo took his 4th grade math unit test. He got all the multi-step word problems right, only showed his go-to multiplication strategy, and his teacher marked it full credit. That was a small win. His mom told me he hasn’t had a stomach ache before school this month, which is a bigger one. I still see 7th graders who come to tutoring who can’t do basic addition, because they got lost in the pace back in 3rd grade and no one ever stopped to backtrack. The standards aren’t intentionally designed for failure, but the pressure to hit every checkmark on the timeline leaves a lot of kids behind anyway. For now, all we can do is adjust for our own kids, one problem at a time. No neat fix, no big system change, just small steps that keep them liking math long enough to get there when they’re ready.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Are State Math Standards Designed for Failure