Why the Way We Teach History Matters More Than We Think
I was standing at the office kitchen counter, waiting for the microwave to finish reheating my leftover pasta, when a colleague walked in and started telling me about a podcast she’d heard the night before. It was about the Great Migration—how millions of Black families left the rural South for northern cities in the twentieth century. She was shaking her head. “I never learned any of that,” she said. “We spent the whole semester on the Civil War, and I couldn’t tell you one thing about what happened after Reconstruction.”
I nodded, but she kept going. “It’s so strange, you know? I remember my history classes as being all about presidents and battles and dates. But this podcast told the story of one family that moved from Alabama to Chicago, and it described their first winter, how they didn’t know about steam radiators and almost set the apartment on fire. I’m forty-two years old, and that single story taught me more about the Great Migration than twelve years of social studies ever did.”
The microwave beeped. I took my bowl out, and we stood there for another fifteen minutes talking about it. We both realized we’d been taught history as a finished product, a sequence of names and events to memorize for tests. What we’d almost never gotten was the chance to experience it as a series of human choices, messy and complicated and still echoing today.
That conversation stuck with me long after I finished my lunch. I kept thinking about my own kids, both of them now in elementary school, and how they were starting to bring home history worksheets. In second grade, my daughter learned about Abraham Lincoln. She colored a picture of a log cabin, memorized the Gettysburg Address phrase “four score and seven years ago,” and that was basically it. When I asked her why Lincoln mattered, she said, “He freed the slaves.” When I asked her how he did it, or what happened after, she shrugged.
I don’t say this to criticize her teacher. I know classrooms are crowded and curricula are packed. The pressure to cover a certain amount of material by June is real. But watching my daughter color that log cabin made me realize something: if history is only a list of facts, kids will memorize it for a quiz and then forget it the way my colleague forgot the Civil War. The problem isn’t the facts themselves. The problem is that we rarely give children a way to make connections between the past and their own lives.
Since that day in the kitchen, I’ve been thinking more deliberately about how we approach history at home. I’m not a historian. I’m not a curriculum expert. I’m just a parent who wants my kids to understand that the world wasn’t always the way it is now, and that ordinary people made choices that shaped it. That’s a lot harder than handing them a textbook chapter, but it’s also a lot more meaningful.
One thing that has worked well is starting close to home. Instead of starting with colonial America or ancient Egypt, I’ve been telling my children about the history of our own neighborhood. We live in a city that has a huge park, and one weekend I looked up a photo of what that park looked like in the 1920s. It used to be an empty field with a dirt racetrack. My kids were genuinely shocked. “Where were the houses?” my son asked. “There weren’t any,” I said. “People didn’t live here yet.”
That simple conversation opened up a whole line of questions. Why did people build houses there? Who decided? What happened to the dirt racetrack? We didn’t answer all of them, but that was okay. The point was that history became something you could observe change happening, not static names in a book.
Another small adjustment I’ve made is to talk about family history more intentionally. Every Thanksgiving, we used to just eat dinner and say vague things about ancestors. But last year, I asked my daughter to interview her grandmother with a list of questions. Not “What was life like when you were little?” but more specific things: “Where did you live when you were seven? What school did you go to? What did you eat for breakfast? How did you get to school if it was raining?” My daughter came back with a whole new appreciation for the fact that history is something real people lived through. She learned that her grandmother had no running water in her house until she was ten. That tiny fact made the Great Depression more real to my daughter than any chart of economic indicators ever could.
I’ve also found that comparing photographs is one of the easiest and most concrete ways to show children how history matters. A few weeks ago, I showed my kids two pictures of the same street in our town. One was taken in 1975, one was taken last month. The differences were obvious: the type of cars, the clothes, the signs. But the similarities were also surprising. The same hardware store was still there, painted a different color. The same brick building with a dented awning. My son asked, “Did the same people go to work here every day like Dad goes to work?” That question was more valuable than any worksheet he’s brought home.
Of course, I can’t do this all the time. There are evenings when dinner is rushed, and homework is about fractions, and the last thing I want to do is launch a deep historical investigation. But that’s fine. The small, inconsistent moments are often the ones that matter most. I don’t think we need to turn every family meal into a history seminar. I just think we need to be willing to say “I don’t know” and then look something up with our kids. That’s one of the most important things I’ve learned from that work conversation. The way we teach history matters, but so does the way we let our kids see us questioning it.
My colleague and I didn’t solve anything that day in the kitchen. She went back to her desk, and I went back to mine. But before she left, she said something I keep coming back to. “I don’t think I ever realized that history was supposed to be about regular people. I always thought it was about the big guys, the ones with statues.” I think about that a lot. My kids are young enough that they still believe the stories I tell them directly. They don’t yet think history belongs exclusively to famous men on horses. If I can keep that alive for them—if I can show them that their own street, their own family, their own questions are part of the story—then maybe when they’re forty-two, they won’t be surprised to learn that the past was complicated.
I’m still figuring out how to do this well. Some evenings it works, some evenings it doesn’t. But I’ve stopped treating history as a subject that only happens in school. It’s something we do together, in small pieces, whenever a question comes up. That’s a start.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why the Way We Teach History Matters More Than We Think