Why Taiwan’s Exam-Focused Classrooms Leave Kids Empty (and What One Teacher Started Doing Differently)
On a Tuesday afternoon, I watched a roomful of ten-year-olds copy notes from a projector screen. The slide showed six paragraphs about the water cycle, each one pre-highlighted with “Important!” in pink. The teacher read each line aloud, then asked the class, “Understand?” and the children answered, in unison, “Yes, Teacher.” No one raised a hand. No one looked confused. They just wrote.
I was sitting in the back as a guest teacher, there to observe for the day. The girl next to me, Mina, had her notebook open to a page filled with neat, identical bullet points from the day before. When I whispered, “What part of the water cycle do you think is coolest?” she blinked at me as if I had asked a trick question. Then she turned back to her notebook and underlined the word “evaporation.”
This is what education mostly looks like in Taiwan, and it’s very good at producing students who can answer test questions. It’s not very good at producing students who like learning. I know, because I was one of those students, and now I’m a teacher trying something else.
The System That Produces, Not Nurtures
People often describe Taiwanese schools as a “processing plant.” A child goes in at seven in the morning, usually with a packed bag containing textbooks, workbooks, and a lunchbox. They sit through seven or eight periods, each one a transfer of information from a teacher’s PowerPoint to their notebooks. Then, at 4 p.m., many head to “cram schools” (buxiban) for another three hours of practice problems. At 9 p.m., they come home, eat dinner, and start homework that could take another two hours. This continues for twelve years.
The result is a system that prizes accuracy over reasoning and speed over curiosity. It rewards children who can memorize the correct answer and punishes—through lowered scores and teacher disappointment—children who hesitate, ask “why,” or think differently. The goal is not to understand a subject, but to reproduce it perfectly on an exam.
I felt this myself growing up in Taipei. In elementary school, I learned that a sentence in a Chinese essay was “good” if it used a specific type of metaphor. I learned that a science question had only one right answer, and that I should write it down without thinking too hard. I learned to worry about looking stupid. By high school, my classmates and I had internalized a simple rule: What can’t be tested doesn’t matter.
That’s the sterile part. Not just the lack of discussion or creative projects, but the removal of anything messy—doubt, disagreement, play, failure. The classroom becomes a clean, quiet room where children are expected to absorb quietly. They don’t talk to each other. They don’t make messes. They certainly don’t challenge the teacher.
A Little Experiment on a Tuesday
Mina’s classroom was typical, but I couldn’t just sit there. When the water cycle lesson finished, there were ten minutes left. The teacher asked me to do a short activity. I didn’t have a plan. I just asked the children to draw a picture of the water cycle from memory, but without writing any labels.
Most of them panicked. One boy raised his hand and asked, “Do we need to draw clouds? Or just the arrows?” Another girl erased her drawing three times because her arrows weren’t perfectly straight. I told them, “It doesn’t need to be beautiful. I just want to see if you can show that water moves.”
Slowly, they started. The boy with the cloud question drew a large, lumpy cloud and then, underneath, a tiny river. When he finished, he looked at me cautiously and said, “Is this right?” I said it was a fine river. Then I asked him, “Where does the water come from before it’s in the cloud?” He tilted his head and said, “The ocean, because the sun heats it. But wait, there’s no ocean in my drawing.” That was the first time he questioned his own work all day.
It wasn’t a triumph. It was a tiny crack in the clean wall. But it reminded me that the curiosity is still in there, buried under years of rules about what a “correct drawing” looks like.
Why Sterile Feels Safe
Parents often ask me, “But won’t less pressure make children fall behind?” It’s a fair question. Taiwan’s exam system is the gateway to university placement, which is still the main path to stable jobs. The adults who love their kids are trying to protect them from a harsh future. Our education system is sterile because the stakes are high.
Yet the cost is a hidden one. I have seen bright, kind third-graders cry because they got an 85 on a math test. I have seen teenagers who can list every dynasty in Chinese history but who have never once stayed up late reading a book “for fun.” I have seen kids who are so exhausted that they can’t remember what they studied the day before, yet they keep going because stopping feels like failure.
The problem is not that tests exist. The problem is that the entire learning experience is shaped around eliminating error. Children begin to see a wrong answer not as a signal to try again, but as evidence that they are not smart. This makes them cautious and anxious. They stop asking questions because questions expose gaps. They become excellent at finding the one right answer and terrible at finding the interesting question.
What I’m Trying In My Own Classroom
I don’t teach in the same school anymore. These days, I run a small after-school tutoring group with a different rule: we only work on problems that don’t have a single answer. We read short stories and talk about what the character was feeling, even if the “correct” feeling isn’t written in the answer key. We do word problems and I ask, “What’s the first thing you notice? What’s missing?” I often say, “I don’t know the answer, but I’d like to figure it out with you.”
With the parents, I suggest small changes at home. Instead of asking “Did you study?” ask “What did you find confusing today?” Instead of praising a perfect score, say, “What was hard about that? Tell me how you got there.” It sounds small, but it shifts the focus from performance to process.
I also encourage parents to let their children do one “wasteful” thing a day—something that has no academic value, like building a weird Lego shape or cooking a recipe at home. In Taiwan’s environment, this feels almost radical. But it’s the opposite of sterile. It’s sticky. It’s messy. It’s what produces a kid who asks, “What if I pour the water through this funnel instead?”
Still Learning to Let Go
I can’t say my experiment has transformed any lives. The kids in my group still grumble when I ask for their opinion instead of the “right answer.” The parents still ask, every few months, whether the group will cover enough grammar for the big exam. And Mina, that girl in the classroom? I don’t know what happened to her. Maybe she went on to cram school and a top university and a stable job. Maybe she became one of the many adults who tell me, quietly, “I don’t really like to think about school.”
What I do know is this: our education system is designed to keep kids in a safe, sanitized zone where they never feel lost. But being lost is sometimes how you learn to think. My students need less tutoring in correct answers and more time to be confused, to ask imperfect questions, to draw a lumpy cloud and then wonder where the water goes next.
I’m still figuring out how to give them that time in a world that wants fast, clean results. But I’m going to keep turning off the projector slide and handing them a blank sheet of paper. That’s not a radical plan. It’s just a small, everyday refusal to let the processing plant win.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Taiwan’s Exam-Focused Classrooms Leave Kids Empty (and What One Teacher Started Doing Differently)