Why Standardized Testing Doesn’t Measure What Most Parents Think It Does
Last Wednesday, I sat across from Lila, mom of my 4th grade student Mia, at our after-school parent-teacher conference. The linoleum table smelled like lemon cleaner and the cheap hot chocolate the PTA sold out by the gym, and Lila kept twisting her paper cup in her hands, the state standardized test score report folded small in her other hand. “I don’t get it,” she said, pushing it across the table toward me. “It says she’s below basic in reading. But she stayed up three nights last week writing a graphic novel about raccoons that steal my garden vegetables. She reads every single night before bed. What is this actually saying?”
I pulled Mia’s writing folder from the stack beside me and flipped it open to the graphic novel, then to the notes she’d taken for her group’s playground project, where she’d interviewed our local parks department director to learn how to write a grant proposal. The test had asked her to identify the main idea of a 5-paragraph nonfiction piece about reforestation, and she’d gotten three out of five multiple-choice questions wrong. The problem wasn’t that she couldn’t read the text. It was that Mia always looks for multiple angles. She’d scribbled in the margins that the author left out how Indigenous communities have managed forest health better than government policies for decades, so she couldn’t bring herself to pick the “correct” main idea listed, because it didn’t match what she saw as the text’s real gap. That kind of critical thinking is what I spend most of my class time encouraging, but it counted against her on that test.
I saw the same thing last year with Javi, a 5th grader whose family owns the taco truck down on Main Street. Javi can add up three orders of tacos, a side of chips and guac, calculate tax and change, and have it back to you before you finish typing your text to your friend. Every week, he helps his dad figure out how many pounds of carnitas to order for a holiday weekend, based on the weather forecast and how busy they were the year before. He’s one of the most practical, quick-thinking math students I’ve ever had. But he scored below basic on the state math test. Why? He’s a slow, careful worker who checks every problem twice, and he ran out of time on the no-calculator section. The test measured how fast he could rush through questions, not how good he is at actually using math.
Most of us grew up with standardized testing, so we assume it measures what it claims to: how much your kid knows, how ready they are for the next grade. But the longer I teach, the more clear it is that it measures a whole lot of things that have nothing to do with actual learning. It measures how good a kid is at bubbling answer circles without making a mistake. It measures whether they had a good breakfast that morning, whether their anxiety was acting up, whether they’ve ever experienced the random topic the test uses for its sample passage. Three years ago, there was a reading question about a sailing regatta, and half the kids in my class had never been sailing, didn’t know what the words “jib” or “boom” meant, so they got the question wrong even though they could perfectly answer the comprehension part if it had been about something they knew.
I don’t tell parents to throw the score report away entirely. It can be useful as one red flag: if a kid scores way lower than their everyday class work consistently, that’s a sign to check for undiagnosed vision issues, hearing problems, or unrecognized test anxiety that we can work on together. But it’s never the full story. I’ve made one small change to how I run conferences that makes a big difference, and it takes almost no extra work. I pull two work samples from every kid’s folder before conference night: one that shows their strength, one that shows what they’ve been working on, and I show those to parents first, before I even mention the test score. That small shift keeps the conversation focused on the kid, not the number.
For parents, there are three small, low-effort things I suggest when that score report shows up in the mail. First, don’t open it at the dinner table with your kid there. Open it alone first, so you can process any surprise or frustration before you talk about it with them. Second, write down three things your kid does well that can’t show up on a multiple-choice test, and tape that note right to the front of the score report. It can be anything: “helps the neighbor walk her dog,” “tells great jokes,” “figures out how to fix the Wi-Fi when it breaks.” That keeps you from fixating on the one number. Third, if your kid has to do practice tests for school, spend 10 minutes practicing one simple skill that doesn’t have anything to do with math or reading: teach them to pause, take three deep breaths, and guess an answer if they’ve been stuck for more than a minute. That skill helps most kids more than any cram session, and it’s low stress to practice.
Last month, Mia’s group presented their playground picnic table proposal to the school board. She spoke for three minutes, answered all the board members’ questions clearly, and they approved the funding last week. When she told me, she was grinning so wide her dimples showed, and I thought about that score report sitting in her file. It doesn’t say anything about how good she is at organizing a group, writing a persuasive proposal, or speaking in front of a room of adults. None of those things fit on a bubble sheet. The system still requires us to give these tests every year, and I still have to talk about the scores with parents. I don’t know when that will change. But for now, the work that matters is reminding parents that the number on the page is just one small piece of who your kid is. It’s not the whole story, and it never will be.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Standardized Testing Doesn’t Measure What Most Parents Think It Does