Why Smart Kids End Up with More Work (and What to Do About It)
The kitchen table was covered in pencil shavings again. My son Leo, age eight, was hunched over a worksheet titled “Extension Challenge: Multiplication Logic Puzzles.” His sister had finished her homework in fifteen minutes and was already building something with LEGOs in the living room. Leo had been sitting there for forty-five minutes, erasing furiously, his face set in the particular sullenness he gets when he knows he’s supposed to feel lucky but doesn’t.
“I hate being smart,” he said, not looking up.
I knew better than to argue with him in that moment. He was on his third worksheet of the evening, and I could see the problem clearly. Leo’s teacher, Ms. Delgado, had pulled me aside at the last parent-teacher conference with what she clearly thought was good news.
“He finishes his math in half the time,” she’d said, beaming. “So I’ve been giving him extra enrichment material to keep him challenged. He’s so gifted, we don’t want him to get bored.”
And that was that. Every day, while his classmates finished their regular assignment and moved on to free reading or drawing, Leo got a stapled packet of “challenge” work. When he finished that, he got another one the next day. He was eight years old and already understood something that took me until my thirties to figure out: the better you are at something, the more people will ask you to do it.
The conversation at home hadn’t been much better. A few weeks before, we’d had a small crisis when Leo got a 94% on a spelling test—his first score that wasn’t a 100% all year. He came home white-faced, like he’d committed some kind of crime. We tried to reassure him that 94% was excellent, but the damage was already done. At some point, we had accidentally taught him that being “the smart kid” meant performing perfectly all the time. Every slip felt like a fall from grace.
I started paying closer attention after that. At the next school pickup, I stood by the classroom door and watched. One of Leo’s classmates, a boy named Theo, struggled with a division worksheet. He asked Ms. Delgado for help. She walked Theo through the steps, patient and kind. Leo, meanwhile, had finished his regular work, and when he asked what to do next, the teacher handed him a spiral-bound book of logic puzzles without even looking up.
Leo took the book and quietly opened it. He didn’t look proud. He looked resigned.
I want to be careful here. Ms. Delgado isn’t a villain. She’s an experienced teacher who genuinely cares about her students, and I can understand why she does this. It’s a practical response to a real problem—how to keep a fast learner engaged when you’ve got twenty-eight other kids who need your attention. But somewhere along the way, we’ve conflated “smart” with “can handle more.” And that has real consequences.
The first consequence is that our smart kids start to associate intelligence with burden. When Leo was five, he was excited to read. By seven, he was hiding his chapter books in his closet because reading meant another type of homework. The thing that was supposed to be his gift had become his job.
The second consequence is that these extension packets and extra challenges rarely involve actual struggle. Most of the “enrichment” materials are just more of the same work, but with bigger numbers or more abstract concepts. They don’t teach Leo how to push through genuine difficulty. They teach him that being smart means the work should always come easily. The moment it doesn’t—like that 94% on spelling—he feels like a fraud.
We started making changes at home, and not because I have a degree in psychology or any special expertise. We did it out of desperation and trial and error.
The first thing we did was stop praising him for being smart. For years, Leo had heard variations of “You’re so clever!” and “You’re naturally gifted!” from family, friends, and teachers. We switched to noticing effort instead. When he practiced guitar for twenty minutes without quitting, I said, “You really stuck with that even when it got tricky.” I tried not to say, “You’re such a talented musician.” It felt awkward at first, almost dishonest. But after a few weeks, I noticed Leo talking about his own effort more—saying things like “I had to try three times before I got that math problem.”
The second thing we did was talk to Ms. Delgado about the extra packets. I used the delivery method that I’d found works best with busy teachers: a small, specific request framed as concern for the child, not criticism of the school. “Leo is getting stressed about maintaining his grades,” I said. “We’d love for him to have more time to read for fun at home, so we’re going to reduce his after-school load. If he finishes early in class, could he just read a book instead?”
She looked slightly surprised but agreed. We didn’t need to overhaul the entire system. We just needed to give Leo permission to finish his work and then stop.
The most surprising change came when we deliberately introduced difficulty into our weekends. We started doing jigsaw puzzles that were clearly too hard for him, board games where he would sometimes lose, and kitchen chemistry experiments that failed the first time. It felt like we were manufacturing struggle, and maybe we were. But Leo needed experience with failure that didn’t have a grade attached to it. He needed to see that the world wouldn’t end if he didn’t know the answer right away.
One Sunday afternoon, we attempted to build a birdhouse from scratch. Leo measured wrong, sawed off the wood too short, and got visibly frustrated. For a moment, I saw the old pattern start—him pushing the pieces away, saying “it’s stupid anyway,” bracing himself for a failure that would confirm he actually wasn’t that smart after all. I didn’t jump in to fix it. I just sat there on the garage floor for a long, quiet minute.
“What if we start the base over but use a pencil this time to mark where you want to cut?” I said.
Leo sighed but picked the wood back up. When the birdhouse was finally done—a bit lopsided, with nails sticking out in unexpected places—he hung it on the fence in the backyard. He didn’t call it perfect. He called it “pretty decent for my first try.”
That felt like progress.
I’m not saying we’ve solved everything. Leo still has days when he comes home exhausted, carrying the invisible weight of being the kid who’s expected to know things. We still have homework battles. I still have to remind myself not to jump in with the answer when he’s stuck, because my instinct is always to help him succeed quickly rather than let him sit in the discomfort of not understanding yet. That instinct is hard to break.
But I’ve made peace with the fact that being smart isn’t a reward—it’s a set of skills like any other. And like any other skill, it needs room to fail, time to rest, and a reason beyond praise to keep going. Leo is starting to learn that his value doesn’t depend on finishing first or scoring highest. We’re both still figuring out what that means on a Tuesday night at the kitchen table, but at least now, when he finishes his homework, he gets to go build something. Just because he can do more doesn’t mean he always should.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Smart Kids End Up with More Work (and What to Do About It)