Why Obedience Is Often Valued Over Leadership In Korean College Admissions: A Teacher’s Perspective
The fluorescent lights in the 3rd floor teacher’s lounge hummed too loud last November, when 18-year-old Jiwon pushed open the door holding her crumpled college application personal statement, cheeks streaked with mascara. I’d just finished grading midterms and was picking at an expired ginseng candy from my desk drawer, so I waved her in and pulled out the chipped plastic couch no one ever sits on.
She spread the statement out on my desk, and the red pen marks jumped off the page. Her entire opening paragraph – the one about organizing a 200-student petition to replace moldy cafeteria lunch tables and add affordable vegan options for students with dietary restrictions – was crossed out. Scrawled in the margin in her guidance counselor’s neat handwriting was one line: “This makes you look argumentative and disobedient. Remember: Only the obedient become leaders here.”
Jiwon wiped her cheek on her sleeve and said she’d thought showing leadership would help her get into Seoul National. She’d spent three months collecting signatures, meeting with the parent-teacher association, negotiating with the food service company. It was the hardest thing she’d ever done in high school. But her counselor told her that kind of initiative was the wrong kind of initiative.
I’ve taught English at a public high school in Seoul for 12 years, so I didn’t argue with her when she said that. I’ve seen this play out too many times. Two years ago, a student named Minjun started an after-school club to talk about mental health stigma, something our school never officially acknowledges. He had top 5% test scores, but all three SKY universities rejected him. The unspoken reason every guidance teacher whispered was that he’d drawn too much negative attention to the school’s high stress environment. He ended up going to a mid-tier regional university, and he still hasn’t landed the clinical job he wanted at a major Seoul hospital.
The unwritten rule at the core of Korean college admissions isn’t really about grades or test scores anymore, not when top schools have shifted to weighting personal statements and extracurriculars more heavily. It’s that leadership doesn’t mean challenging the system. It means proving you can work within it, follow the hierarchy, and wait your turn. The people who end up running the country, running big companies, running top universities all got there by following the rules when they were young. Why would they reward someone who wants to change those rules now?
My own daughter is 16, and she’s starting to prepare her applications for next year. A few weeks ago, we were folding her school uniforms at the kitchen table after dinner, and she told me she wanted to list her work organizing a student push to reverse the new ban on hoodies in the classroom. A lot of kids get cold in the over-airconditioned building in spring, and the ban was unevenly enforced against girls who didn’t want to show their shoulders. She collected 150 signatures and met with the principal to negotiate a compromise: hoodies are allowed as long as the logo is small.
I hesitated for a full 10 seconds before I answered. I knew what any guidance counselor would say: that it makes her look like a troublemaker. I didn’t tell her to take it off, and I didn’t tell her to keep it as some big act of rebellion that would tank her chances. Instead, I showed her how to rephrase it. Instead of opening with “I led a protest against the school’s unfair uniform ban,” we rewrote it to say, “I worked with fellow students and school administration to adjust the uniform policy to better meet student needs during cool spring months.” It’s still true, it still highlights that she organized people and got things done, but it frames her work as collaborative, not oppositional. It plays by the unwritten rules.
That’s the small, concrete thing I tell all the parents and students who ask me for advice now: if your kid has done something that challenges the status quo, don’t lie about it, but don’t lead with the conflict. Highlight how they worked with existing structures to get a result, even if they pushed those structures a little. The second thing I tell everyone to do is keep a separate, private list of all the things your kid did that don’t fit what admissions officers want to see. My daughter keeps hers in a locked note on her phone, with photos of the petition signatures and a screenshot of the principal’s email approving the new rule. It doesn’t go on any application, but it’s hers. It reminds her what she actually accomplished, no matter what colleges want to see.
Last month, Jiwon came back to visit me after her first semester of college. She got into Sogang, a good school that wasn’t her first choice, but she’s happy there. She told me she just started a campus food advocacy group, pushing the university to lower meal plan prices and add more dietary options. She didn’t put the cafeteria protest on her application, but she didn’t stop doing it.
I still don’t know if what I’m doing with my daughter is right. Softening the edges of her story to fit the system feels like a small kind of betrayal sometimes, but it’s also the practical choice. We still have a year left before applications are due, and we still argue about what to include and what to leave out. The rule says only the obedient become leaders, and right now, that rule holds. It’s just up to us to make sure the next generation of leaders doesn’t forget how to question things, even when they have to hide that part of themselves to get to the top.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Obedience Is Often Valued Over Leadership In Korean College Admissions: A Teacher’s Perspective