Why My Students Draw Their Own Go Boards Before Playing Go
Last indoor recess, two third graders were huddled over a piece of copy paper. No tablets, no cards, no arguing. I walked over to see what was so interesting.
One boy had drawn a big lopsided star and filled it with a web of crisscrossing lines. The other boy was holding a black marker, studying the crossings like he was defusing a bomb. “Can I play here?” he asked, pointing to a spot near the center.
“No,” the first boy said. “That’s my secret tunnel.”
“That’s not a tunnel. That’s a line.”
“It’s a tunnel if I drew it.”
“Fine. Can I go here?”
The boy nodded. The marker made a small dot. Then the first boy used a blue marker to make a dot two crossings away. They went on like that for the rest of recess.
I asked what the game was called. “Doodle Go,” they said. “You draw a board. Then you play Go on it.”
I should explain how Doodle Go ended up in my classroom. It wasn’t planned. A few weeks earlier, I taught a small group how to play the board game Go. I brought in a printed 9×9 board and showed them how black and white stones surround each other. They were curious. They played a few moves. Then one girl pushed the paper away and said, “This board is boring.”
“Go boards are supposed to be boring,” I said. “That’s the point.”
She shook her head. “Can I draw my own?”
I said yes, mostly to be funny. I handed her a blank sheet of copy paper and a pencil. Maybe I expected her to scribble for a minute and then ask for the real board back. Instead, she drew a giant tree with branches and roots, then turned it into a grid. She called it “Tree Go.” Two other kids saw it and wanted to play on the tree instead of the regular board. That was the beginning.
Since then, Doodle Go has shown up on its own. Some kids draw a grid first and then add a drawing around it. Others draw a monster and let its body parts become the board. One girl made a butterfly with diagonal lines inside. A boy spent an entire recess on a “castle” with a secret entrance that was actually a gap in the lines. Another refused to draw any lines until he had decided on the story behind them.
What I find interesting is that they aren’t just drawing. They are designing a game. Every intersection is a decision. Every line can become a border, a connection, or a trap. When they draw the board themselves, they take ownership of the rules in a way that doesn’t happen with a printed grid.
The rules we use are loose. Kids have settled into a version that works. First, you draw a shape and fill it with lines. The lines can be straight or wavy, but they have to cross. The crossing points are where you play. Players take turns placing dots on empty crossings. If all the lines leading out of your dot are blocked by the other player’s dots, your dot is captured. If your dots are connected in a group, you count them together. No one has figured out a perfect scoring system, and that might be the point. The game ends when staring at the paper for a full minute produces no good move. Then everyone counts their dots, argues about one line, and plays again.
It’s not exactly the ancient game of Go, but it borrows the core idea: simple moves, complicated strategy. And it’s easier to see why Go has lasted for thousands of years when you watch a child realize that one dot can block two roads at once.
I’ve also noticed something about the kids who play it. The kids who are impatient with rules don’t mind this game. They get to decide what counts as a tunnel. The kids who are afraid of losing don’t mind losing, because their board was part of the game. They can say “you only won because my map was weird.” That makes losing feel less personal.
If you want to try it, the low-friction version is simple: give a child a blank piece of paper and one marker. Ask them to draw a tangle of roads. Not a board, just roads that cross. Then put a dot on any crossing and ask them to do the same. When one of you has no roads left to escape, remove that dot. That’s it. You don’t need to teach Go first. You don’t need instructions. In fact, instructions can ruin it.
A few small things have made a difference in my classroom. I keep a stack of copy paper and a cup of pens in a low drawer, not on my desk. When a kid says they’re bored, I don’t suggest a game. I suggest a board. “Draw a board and I’ll play with you.” That’s enough. The game comes from them.
I’ve also learned to step back when they start arguing about rules. Most teachers want to settle disputes. But with Doodle Go, the arguing is the lesson. They practice explaining their reasoning. “This line is a bridge because I drew it thicker.” “No, it’s a wall.” I ask one question: “Can you draw a line that fixes it?” Usually they can.
Maybe the reason this works is that Go is so simple. There are no cards to read, no pieces to move along a track. The only mechanic is placing and blocking. When you let children draw the board, they can make the game as easy or as hard as they want. A board with few intersections is a quick game. A board with dozens of tiny crossings is almost impossible. Every child sets their own difficulty level without realizing it.
I’m not going to claim that Doodle Go is a miracle. It doesn’t make kids peaceful angels. Last week two students got into a loud argument over whether a line that crossed another line “counted” if it was drawn on top of an old erased line. I had to separate them. One said that erasing was a rule change. The other said it was cheating. I didn’t solve it. They solved it by agreeing that no one could draw in pencil anymore. Only pen.
That kind of problem-solving is exactly what I want to see, but it comes with messiness. There are days when I wonder if the game is worth the noise. Then recess ends, and a kid puts a half-finished board in the “in case of boredom” folder, and another kid is already planning their next board for tomorrow. I think that counts for something.
I don’t know what will happen with Doodle Go. It might fade out in a few weeks. Or it might become as ordinary as tic-tac-toe. Right now, the kids are still discovering what the game can do. So am I. Today a quiet girl handed me a board she had drawn at home. It was a maze with no exits, and she had filled every crossing with dots in two colors. She said it was a problem: she had managed to play every single point without any captures. She wasn’t asking me to solve it. She just wanted me to know that a board can be a puzzle too.
I’m still figuring out the answer. But the next time a kid tells me the board is boring, I’ll hand them a blank sheet of paper.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why My Students Draw Their Own Go Boards Before Playing Go