Why Kids Struggle With Online Community Rules: What I Learned When My Teen Needed Help Building Karma
The salmon dinner dishes were stacked in the sink last month when my 14-year-old Lila pushed off the kitchen table, phone in hand, and sighed loud enough to cut through the hum of the fridge. “Mom, can I borrow your Reddit account?” she said. I looked up from wiping garlic bread crumbs off the tablecloth. “What for?” She turned her phone around to show me a bright red error message under her draft post of her variegated pothos cutting, propped up next to her bedroom window for good light. The message read plain as day: In order to post your account must be older than 10 days and have 100 positive karma.
Lila had been rooting that cutting for three months. She’d changed the water every Sunday, moved it to a bigger jar when the roots outgrew it, and spent two weeks scrolling that local plant swap group waiting for someone to offer the monstera adansonii cutting she’d been coveting. She’d made her new account specifically for this trade, eight days prior, and had already commented on 20 posts to get the ball rolling. She had 17 upvotes total. “It’s stupid,” she said, leaning against the fridge, her sock with the hole in the toe propped on the baseboard. “Why do they care how old my account is? I’m not selling anything bad.”
I knew what the rule was for. I’ve been on Reddit for years, and I’ve seen what happens when groups don’t have those requirements. A friend of mine got scammed out of $40 on a plant swap a couple years back, from a brand new account that got banned a day later. Spammers post fake links to “free plants” that are actually malware, and throwaway new accounts are almost always the source. But I didn’t just blurt that out, and I didn’t just hand over my account. I’ve learned that handing over access to your personal accounts never ends up being a good idea for anyone, and I was curious if she could work through this on her own.
I pulled a chair next to her and asked to see the comments she’d left. Almost all of them were one generic line: “So pretty!” or “Love this!” That’s why no one upvoted them—they’re fine, but they don’t add anything to the conversation. People upvote comments that help, that say something specific. I pointed to a new post at the top of the feed: a girl had just shared that her fiddle leaf fig was dropping all its leaves, and almost every comment was just “hope it’s okay!” I told Lila she could share what she’d just learned with her own pothos, when it dropped leaves after sitting by the AC vent all summer. “Tell her that exact experience,” I said. “That’s something people will upvote because it’s real and helpful.”
We spent 20 minutes that night going through the group feed, and she left 12 new comments, all specific. She told someone their propagation setup looked great and asked what brand of grow lights they used, she shared that neem oil got rid of the fungus gnats she had in her succulents last month, she agreed with another user that terracotta pots are overrated for small, water-rooted cuttings. By the time her account hit the 10-day mark two days later, she had 112 positive karma. She posted her cutting that night, got three trade offers within an hour, and swapped it a week later for exactly the monstera cutting she wanted.
I’ve thought a lot about that stupid little rule since then. We spend so much time talking to kids about online safety—don’t talk to strangers, don’t share your personal info—that we rarely talk about how online communities actually work. Most of these rules that feel arbitrary to new users (and to their parents) aren’t just gatekeeping. They’re guardrails that the people who built the community put up to keep everyone safe. It’s easy to write off a 10-day waiting period and a karma requirement as stupid hoops to jump through, but that doesn’t make them unnecessary.
What I did that night that worked, I think, wasn’t anything fancy. A lot of parents would either just hand over their account to get the kid off their back, or tell them “that’s the rule, so too bad, wait another month.” But instead, I did two small concrete things anyone can copy. First, I stopped to explain what problem the rule was actually solving, not just repeat “that’s the rule.” I told her about the scam my friend had, how spammers use new accounts because they can just make a new one when they get banned. She got it immediately; it wasn’t that hard to understand once it wasn’t just a random error message popping up on her screen. Second, I helped her figure out how to meet the requirement on her own, instead of doing it for her. I didn’t just tell her to “get more karma,” I showed her what kind of contributions earn that karma, because she had no idea that generic nice comments don’t move the needle.
A month later, Lila’s still active in that plant group. She comments a couple times a week, has traded two more cuttings, and last week I heard her on the phone with her friend who’s new to the group complaining about the same karma rule. She just laughed and told her “it’s not that bad, just stop commenting ‘nice’ on everything and actually say something.” I don’t think that’s a lesson she would have learned if I’d just handed her my account. It’s not a big, dramatic life lesson, just a small one: being part of a community online means you have to contribute something before you take something, same as it does offline.
We still have our moments. Lila gets frustrated with other random online rules all the time, and I don’t always have the answer. But this one worked out. It’s nice to see that even the most random-seeming online hoops can turn into a tiny, useful lesson if you don’t just jump through them for your kid.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Kids Struggle With Online Community Rules: What I Learned When My Teen Needed Help Building Karma