Why kids’ online communities require 10-day-old accounts and 100 positive karma: A parent’s guide
I was wiping taco grease off the kitchen stove last Tuesday when my 13-year-old Leo slammed his phone down on the island hard enough to make a half-eaten jar of salsa jump. “What is wrong with these people?” he said, leaning over the counter to show me his screen. There it was, plain as day: In order to post your account must be older than 10 days and have 100 positive karma. Leo had made a new Reddit account that very morning specifically to join a fan community for the pixel art adventure game he’d been obsessing over for months. He’d drawn three pieces of fan art over spring break and had a very urgent question about how to unlock the hidden cat skin you could only get if someone shared a hidden map code. He couldn’t do any of that. He was locked out before he even started.
I’d heard of karma before, but for most of my adult life, I’d associated the word with the yoga studio I went to for three months back in 2019, not a social media score. I asked him what it even meant, and he shrugged, said it’s just what you get when people upvote your posts or comments. He’d commented on three posts on the main game page and had 14 karma total, and his account was 10 hours old. He said he wanted to just delete the whole app and quit the game entirely, that the whole group was just a bunch of snobs who didn’t want new people around. I sat down next to him, because I get that frustration—when I was his age, I got banned from a fan forum for my favorite book series because I accidentally double posted, and I threw a fit that lasted two days. I didn’t dismiss how he felt. I just said, “That’s garbage. You didn’t do anything wrong. Let me check why they have this rule, yeah?”
I texted my nephew, who’s 19 and has been in teen online gaming communities for years, and he connected me to a mod of a large teen art group that uses the same rule. The mod explained it pretty simply: 90% of spam, harassment, and scam posts come from brand new accounts that people make right after getting banned from another group. A troll can make a new account to send hateful messages to kids or drop links to malware disguised as game cheats, but almost none will wait 10 days and put in the work to get 100 karma just to do it. It’s not personal, it’s just a filter. Before the group added the rule, the mod team spent 3 hours a day deleting garbage posts. After adding the rule, that dropped to 15 minutes a day. That extra time goes to answering questions from real kids and organizing fan art contests, not banning bots.
What we did next worked so well that I’ve already shared it with three other parents whose kids have run into the same rule. I didn’t just tell Leo to wait it out or get over it. We made a tiny, low-effort plan. First, if your kid shows interest in a new community where they’ll want to post eventually, help them make the account that day, even if they don’t have anything to share yet. That way the 10-day clock starts ticking right away, instead of them having to wait two full weeks once they’re ready to post. Second, teach them that specific, low-effort genuine comments get karma way faster than spamming or leaving one-word replies. Leo had been dropping “cool” and “nice” on posts, which almost no one bothers to upvote. I told him to pick one tiny detail to mention, like “I love the way you colored the main character’s scarf here” or “I had that same bug last week, it’s so annoying”. It takes 10 extra seconds, but people notice that kind of actual interaction. Leo spent 10 minutes a day for three days leaving those kinds of comments, and hit 100 karma on day 5. Then he just had to wait five more days for his account to hit the 10-day mark.
I used to think these arbitrary-seeming rules were just gatekeeping, keeping new kids out of spaces that should be open. And to be fair, there is a real downside: if your kid hears about a group from a friend at school and wants to join that day, they can’t. It’s frustrating, and it’s okay to acknowledge that frustration with them instead of just repeating “rules are rules”. I told Leo, “It’s not fair that a few bad people mean you have to wait to do this. That sucks.” And that was enough for him to stop being mad enough to work around it. I don’t think a lot of parents realize that you don’t have to defend the rule to help your kid follow it.
Today, Leo’s account turned 11 days old. He posted his three fan art pieces and his question about the cat skin an hour ago. He already has 22 upvotes, and someone dropped the map code in the comments. He’s down in the basement playing the game right now, yelling about how he finally got the skin. It worked out.
I still don’t love that online spaces for kids require these kinds of hoops. It would be nicer if bad people didn’t exist, so kids could just join and post whenever they want. But this rule isn’t just random nonsense the mods made up to annoy kids. It’s a simple filter that keeps the majority of garbage out, and it doesn’t take much work for a real kid to work around. We still check in every couple of weeks about what groups he’s in, and what new rules he’s running into. Some are still stupid, some make sense once you ask why they’re there. That’s just how it goes, online and off, I guess.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why kids’ online communities require 10-day-old accounts and 100 positive karma: A parent’s guide