Why I Stopped Trying to Make Learning Fun (And What Happened Instead)
One Tuesday, during a fractions lesson, a boy in the back row pushed his paper away and announced, “This is boring.” Normally I had a plan for that. I’d say “Oh yeah? Watch this!” and pull out a game with dice or a timer. But that day I didn’t have the energy. So I just said, “Okay. It’s boring. What part is boring?”
He stared at me. Then he said the denominators wouldn’t stop changing, and he didn’t remember what they were for. We spent the next two minutes talking about that. No prize. No music. He still figured out the problem.
That moment started to change how I think about education. I used to treat boredom like a fire alarm. If a student was disengaged, I thought I had failed. I spent more time making worksheets look like adventures than making the thinking step clear. But here’s my hot take: fun and learning are not the same thing, and acting like they are makes school worse.
Consider what happens when something is genuinely hard. Your brain doesn’t feel great. It feels confused and slow. Sometimes it’s even unpleasant. That discomfort is not the opposite of learning. It is often what learning feels like. But we’ve built a culture where any sign of frustration means the lesson was bad. So teachers offer easier problems. Or they turn the lesson into a game. Games have their place. But a game can be engaging for the wrong reasons. A kid can be having a wonderful time and not learning anything.
I noticed this with one of my students. She loved worksheets with hidden messages. She solved them quickly. But when I gave her a plain paragraph and asked what it was really saying, she froze. She had learned how to match letters to reveal a joke. She hadn’t learned how to read for meaning. The activity was fun, but it was a mask.
So I stopped teaching like a host. I didn’t throw out every game, but I stopped leading with the gimmick. I began starting lessons with the boring truth. “Today we’re going to work on writing stronger topic sentences. It will take about forty minutes. Let’s read an example.” Some kids immediately looked out the window. But then we started, and the work had to do the work.
At first I panicked. We’re often told that engagement is the door to learning. If kids aren’t paying attention, nothing matters. But a child can be quiet and involved in a hard problem, and a child can be shouting and playing and miss every step. Attention isn’t always visible. I had to accept that.
The practical change came down to questions. I stopped asking “Does that make sense?” because it’s too easy to say yes. I started asking “What is the last part you understood?” and “What would you do next if you had to guess?” The first question tells me exactly where to begin. The second one catches what thinking they can already do. Then I wait. I don’t fill the silence. Ten seconds feels really long. But if I jump in and rescue them, they don’t have to think.
At home, it’s harder. My son gets stuck on spelling the way a door gets stuck on a bad hinge. He says, “I can’t write that word.” I used to spell it for him. I thought I was helping. Now I say, “Spell the first three letters. You know them.” He complains. Then he spells “t-h-e” and stops. I wait. He mutters. He looks at the ceiling. Eventually the letters come out. The weird thing is that while he’s muttering, he’s doing his own work. If I give him the word, he doesn’t have to learn anything.
I’ve tried to explain this to parents. It’s awkward. A parent says, “My child says she’s bored.” I say, “Okay. Boredom isn’t an emergency. She might be working through something.” Not every moment of class has to be exciting. The goal is not for a child to be entertained. The goal is for a child to meet a problem, struggle with it, and still keep going.
Of course there is a difference between productive struggle and drowning. If a child is so lost that they stop working, I step in. If they look panicked or close to tears, I lower the step. The trick isn’t to leave kids alone. It’s to be there without taking the thinking away from them. I say things like “Let’s take a break for three minutes, then look again” and “You don’t have to finish this now, but come back to it.”
One of my sixth graders said something that stuck with me. After a long writing workshop, she said, “This is kind of hard, but I want to see what I’m actually trying to say.” That was a good moment. It wasn’t fun. It was something more useful than fun. It was curiosity, and it came after twenty minutes of frustration.
Maybe the real hot take is that we’ve stopped teaching kids how to tolerate not knowing. Everything gets answered right away. The teacher calls on a hand, the app gives a hint, the parent brings a snack. But thinking starts in the space before an answer. If we keep filling that space, the thinking doesn’t happen.
None of this means school should be dull. I still have good days with jokes and real laughter. But the laughter now comes out of the work, not as a break from it. When a kid finally figures out why the denominator matters, they look up and say “Oh”—and that is better than any prize basket I used to hand out.
I don’t know if this is the right answer. Some of my students probably think I let them flounder. Some days I let them flounder for longer than I should. There are moments I still reach for a game when I can’t think of a better way to start. But I don’t see boredom as a crisis anymore. I see it as a signal that asks a question: What is actually hard here? And instead of making that question go away, I try to help them answer it.
The boy who said “This is boring” finished his fraction sheet that day. He left the room with his jacket half on, and I heard him say, “That wasn’t that bad.” It wasn’t a movie moment. But it was enough.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why I Stopped Trying to Make Learning Fun (And What Happened Instead)