Why Dumb School Rules Backfire: What Student Stories Teach Us About Better School Policy
Last Tuesday, I was folding my 10th grader’s soccer uniforms after dinner, scrolling my phone while I waited for the dryer to cycle, when I stumbled on a viral Reddit thread: “Students of Reddit, what is the dumbest rule your school has actually tried to enforce?” I’m a part-time substitute teacher at three local middle and high schools, so I clicked through out of professional curiosity, and ended up reading for 20 minutes, half-amused and half-concerned at how many of the stories matched things I’d seen firsthand.
One high schooler said his admin banned anyone from saying “bless you” after a peer sneezed, citing a need to keep religious expression out of school hallways. Another middle schooler shared that her school implemented a “no bathroom passes during the first or last 10 minutes of class” rule, after too many kids were skipping out early to hang out with friends. Within a month, three kids had wet their pants in class because they couldn’t hold it until the allowed window. One elementary school even tried a “no smiling during assembly” rule, after a group of 3rd graders kept giggling through a guest speaker’s presentation.
That last one didn’t surprise me. A semester ago, I subbed at a middle school that had just rolled out a “total silent hallway” rule between classes. No talking at all, not even a quiet hello to a friend or a quick question about homework for a teacher. The rule came after one incident where a crowd of kids yelling got too rowdy and knocked over a trophy case. Instead of adjusting expectations for volume or crowd flow, admin just banned all talking. I watched a quiet 7th grader get a written referral his first week under the rule for whispering “nice hoodie” to a friend in the stairwell. The teacher who wrote it up told me later she hated doing it, but she was told she’d get a warning if she didn’t enforce every violation.
What strikes me about all these rules is that they almost never start out as a bad idea. Administrators see a specific problem – one kid cheats with a phone hidden in a hoodie pocket, one group gets too disruptive, one kid sneaks drugs in a backpack – and they reach for the simplest, clearest solution: a blanket ban. It makes sense on paper, right? If no one has hoodies, no one can hide phones. If no one talks in the hallway, no one can get rowdy. But what these rules never account for is that the vast majority of kids aren’t the problem. You punish 99% of kids to address the behavior of 1%, and the end result is always more trouble than it’s worth.
Over the last few years subbing, I’ve seen what works better, and it’s way simpler than most admins think. First, before you roll out a new school-wide rule, pull 3-5 student representatives from each grade to weigh in. It doesn’t take a full formal meeting, just a 20-minute chat over lunch. When admins do this, they almost always walk away with a better solution than the blanket ban. For example, if you’re having issues with kids skipping class by hiding in the bathroom, ask the kids what they think. Most will tell you that allowing one pass at a time, or posting a teacher aide to check for loitering, works way better than banning all passes entirely.
Second, test any new rule for 30 days, then check in with teachers and students before making it permanent. I saw a school test a no-backpacks-in-class rule last year, and after 30 days, 80% of teachers reported more late students to class, because kids had to run to lockers between every period to grab the books they needed. Admin adjusted the rule to allow small, slim backpacks instead of getting rid of them entirely, which solved the clutter problem without the constant late arrivals. For parents, if your kid comes home complaining about a dumb new rule, the first concrete step you can take is collect specific examples from them and their friends, then reach out to admin with those instead of just general complaints. Instead of saying “this rule is stupid,” say “my kid has asthma and needs his inhaler in his backpack at all times, and 12 other kids I know have similar medical needs – can we adjust this?” That’s way more likely to get a positive response than a vague rant.
The real hidden cost of these arbitrary rules isn’t just that kids are annoyed for a week. It erodes trust between students and the adults at school. When a kid gets in trouble for something as harmless as saying bless you after a sneeze, they learn that rules are arbitrary, and that people in charge don’t care about common sense. That makes them less likely to follow the rules that actually matter – like no bullying, or no speeding in the parking lot – because they’ve already learned most rules don’t make sense anyway.
I showed the Reddit thread to my son after I finished reading, and he laughed at the no-bless-you rule before telling me his school just rolled out that same no-backpacks-in-class rule I mentioned earlier. He’s late to chemistry twice a week now because of it. We brought it up at the last PTA meeting, and the admin agreed to add three student representatives to the policy committee to review it next month. It’s not a huge fix, and there will always be some rules that don’t make sense. But starting with asking the people who actually follow the rules what they think? That’s a small change that makes a whole lot of sense.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Dumb School Rules Backfire: What Student Stories Teach Us About Better School Policy