Why AI isn’t killing education: What parents and teachers are forgetting about learning
It was 7:15 pm at our kitchen table, goldfish crumbs stuck to the placemat, my 10-year-old son’s half-empty apple juice sweating into his science homework folder, when he looked up at me and said it. “Can I just have ChatGPT write my pollinator report intro? Everyone else in my class is doing it.”
I’d just left a PTA meeting the night before where half the conversation was about how AI was going to ruin this generation, how kids would never learn to write or think for themselves if we let them use it. I almost said no, automatically. But then I leaned over his shoulder and read what he was supposed to write: a three-paragraph introduction defining pollinators and explaining their role in ecosystems. We already had plans to walk around our neighborhood Saturday, count pollinators in the community garden, and add his own observations to the back half of the report. He just wanted the boring opening over with.
I made a deal with him. You can use AI to get the first draft, I said. But you have to cross out every sentence that doesn’t match something you actually care about, and add at least one fact or thought you had before you asked AI for help. He shrugged, typed in the prompt, and pulled up a block of text that was exactly what you’d expect: generic, flat, full of words no 10-year-old would ever use on purpose. He crossed out all but two sentences, then scribbled in the margin: “Last month I watched a YouTube video that said bumblebees bite plant leaves to trick flowers into blooming early so they can get food. No one knows exactly how they figured out to do that. That’s way weirder than most people think pollinators are.”
That line was better than any intro I could have made him write on his own, back when I would have forced him to do every part from scratch to “teach him responsibility.” Before AI, he would have copied a similar generic intro from a pre-written kids’ science site, phoned it in, and never thought twice about pollinators after he turned in the poster. The only thing that changed here is that he got to skip the part that didn’t matter, and spend time on the part he actually cared about.
My friend Lila, who teaches 7th grade math at the local middle school, told me she’s been seeing the same thing. She had a big problem at the start of the year with kids using AI to solve all their homework problems. Instead of writing up a new ban and adding extra cheating penalties, she changed her homework rule: every assignment has to have two extra lines at the bottom, one explaining why the answer makes sense, and one saying what you’d check if you got a different answer. She said at first kids complained, but now she has more hands raised in class asking questions than she’s had in 12 years of teaching. Half the kids used to copy answers from the back of the textbook anyway, she said. AI didn’t create the problem of kids checking boxes instead of thinking. It just made that problem impossible to ignore.
None of this means there’s nothing to worry about. I still catch my son using AI to write silly text messages to his grandma, and I’ve had to talk about when it’s okay to use it and when it’s better to write your own note. But the panic I keep hearing about AI killing education misses the bigger shift that’s happening. We’ve spent decades making kids do work that’s just about memorizing facts and regurgitating generic answers because that’s what was easy to grade. AI can do all of that faster and better than most kids can, and that’s uncomfortable. But it’s also a reminder that that work was never the point.
The concrete changes we’ve made at our house are small, no big overhauls required. First, instead of asking “did you finish your homework?” I ask “what’s the most interesting part you got to work on this week?” It shifts the conversation from checking a box to talking about actual thinking. Second, if my kid wants to use AI for the boring, repetitive parts of an assignment, that’s fine as long as he does two things: edits the AI output to sound like him, and adds at least one original thought or observation from his own experience. Third, we talk openly about what AI can’t do: it can’t count the bees in our backyard, it can’t tell you what it felt like to find a monarch caterpillar on the milkweed we planted, it can’t argue with your friend about whether video games are better than books. That’s the stuff only you can do, so that’s the stuff we focus on.
When we went to count pollinators that Saturday, my son stepped in a muddy puddle by the garden and complained his sock was wet the whole walk home. But he still stopped every two feet to point out different bees and butterflies, and spent 10 minutes crouched in the grass taking a photo of a bumblebee half-asleep on a sunflower. That photo ended up on the front of his poster.
Last week, my son got his pollinator poster back with a B+. The teacher marked off points because the intro was shorter than the requirement. He shrugged and stuck it on the fridge anyway. What he talked about for three days after his presentation was how all the kids crowded around his photo, and how one kid didn’t believe the leaf-biting story until he pulled up the video on his phone after class.
I don’t have all the answers. I don’t know what AI will mean for high school standardized tests, or college applications, or what things will look like when he’s older. I still worry sometimes that I’m letting him cut corners that will hurt him later. But what I see right now is that AI isn’t killing learning. It’s just forcing us to stop hiding from the fact that most of the boring hoops we made kids jump through for decades weren’t ever worth jumping through in the first place. It’s reminding us that learning was never about writing the perfect generic intro, or checking all the boxes on a grading rubric. It’s always been about the part that only you can bring.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why AI isn’t killing education: What parents and teachers are forgetting about learning