What I Learned From Following Up After My Headmaster Meeting About My Son’s Behavior
I leaned against my dented minivan in the elementary school parking lot, turning over the crumpled slip of notebook paper the headmaster had handed me at the end of our first meeting. The oat milk latte I’d grabbed that morning was sweating through the cardboard sleeve, and I’d already missed my 10 a.m. window for grocery click and collect. The first meeting had left my shoulders up around my ears: Ms. Hale, our headmaster, had laid out three pages of behavior notes—my 9-year-old son Leo getting out of his seat 12 times in one math period, distracting his table group, turning in half-completed writing assignments. I’d left feeling like I’d been called to the principal’s office myself, and spent three nights staring at the notes, overthinking every defensive answer I’d given. The last line, in Ms. Hale’s neat blue ink: “Follow up check-in in two weeks. Let’s sort this out together.”
I almost bailed on prepping for the follow up. I almost just showed up, nodded along, and agreed to whatever next step she suggested, like I did with my older daughter when she was struggling with reading in second grade. Or I could have showed up with a list of reasons the school was failing Leo, which is what all the parenting groups on Facebook told me to do. But instead, that Saturday, I sat down on the end of Leo’s bed while he sorted his Lego rock collection (the pink piece of granite he found on a field trip was front and center) and asked him a question I hadn’t thought to ask before. “What’s the hardest part of your school day right now?”
He didn’t pause, just picked up a chunk of quartz and said, “Math. We do the same times tables every day for 20 minutes, and I already know all of them. I finish my work in 10 minutes, and then I can’t just sit there. So I talk to Jake.”
That was it. No hidden crisis, no unaddressed issue at home, just a kid who was bored and didn’t know what else to do with his extra time. I jotted that down on a fresh note card, added two small things we’d tried at home that week: Leo does 10 minutes of a hard math puzzle every night after homework, and he can get up and walk around the living room whenever he feels restless, and that cuts down on his fidgeting at the dinner table. I added one question I wanted to ask Ms. Hale: Could Leo have something quiet to do when he finishes his class work early? That was my whole agenda, three points, no more.
On the day of the follow up, I walked into Ms. Hale’s office, which always smells like lemon cleaner and the spearmint candies she keeps in a cut glass bowl on her desk. She has a photo of her own golden retriever taped to the side of her computer, same as it’s been for the four years we’ve been at this school. She had a folder labeled with Leo’s name already out, and started by saying she’d talked to his classroom teacher, and they were ready to refer him for screening to test for attention issues, which is what she’d suggested at the first meeting.
I pulled out my note card, told her what Leo had said, and asked if anyone had checked how long it took him to finish his work. She called his teacher down the hall right then, and two minutes later the teacher popped in with his work folder. Sure enough, every math assignment from the past two weeks was turned in at least 15 minutes before the rest of the class, with all the answers correct. No one had connected the early finish to the disruptive behavior before—they’d just seen the getting up and talking.
What came next wasn’t a big, dramatic fix. We didn’t switch classes or pull him out for special programming. We agreed on three small changes to try for a month: Leo keeps a bin of math puzzles and drawing paper at his desk for when he finishes work early, he can get up to water the class plant or sharpen his pencils without raising his hand once he’s done, and I check in with him every Sunday night to ask what the most boring part of the previous week was. That’s it.
It’s easy to think that a follow up meeting with a headmaster has to be a big, high-stakes conversation. Either you’re begging for help or you’re fighting for your kid, and there’s no middle ground. I’ve learned the hard way that showing up with a long list of demands or going in ready to agree to anything rarely works. The small stuff makes more difference.
The concrete things I’ve taken away from this, that any parent can do for their own follow up meeting, are simple. First, always talk to your kid before the meeting, not after. Ask a neutral question that doesn’t accuse them of anything—“what’s the longest part of your day?” or “when do you feel most wiggly?” works way better than “why can’t you just sit still?” Second, limit your agenda to three concrete points. Most school meetings are only 20 minutes, and you’ll lose people if you bring a 10-paragraph essay about your kid’s strengths and the school’s failures. Three points is enough to get the conversation moving. Third, ask for a one-month trial of a small change before you jump into big, permanent interventions like testing or switching classes. Small changes are easy to adjust, and they almost always tell you more about what’s actually going on than any assessment can.
It’s been three weeks since our follow up meeting. The number of behavior notes dropped from three or four a week to one or two. Leo still talks to Jake when he shouldn’t, and some days he forgets to get out his puzzle and just fidgets instead. We have another check-in scheduled next month, and we might need to try something different if the behavior picks back up. I don’t know if this is going to be the solution that sticks for the whole school year. But I’m glad I didn’t just show up to the follow up ready to accept whatever the school suggested, or ready to fight. I just showed up with what Leo told me, and that was enough to move things forward.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What I Learned From Following Up After My Headmaster Meeting About My Son’s Behavior