What Happens When a STEM Teacher Uses Video Games in Class
The first time I saw it happen was during a free period. A seventh grader I’ll call Marcus had finished his work early and pulled up a video on his Chromebook—someone building a complicated redstone contraption in Minecraft. Another student leaned over and said, “That’s not even efficient. You could use observers.” Marcus turned, and for the next ten minutes, they argued about signal delays and piston timing like they were discussing a real engineering problem.
I teach middle school science. I’m not a gamer. I grew up on Oregon Trail and the occasional round of Math Blaster, and for a long time, I figured video games were what kids did instead of paying attention. But over the past few years, I’ve started watching more closely. Not just what they play, but how they talk about it. And eventually, I started using that in my classroom.
It didn’t start with a grand plan. It started with a lesson on ratios that was going poorly. I had a worksheet about scale models, and the numbers just weren’t landing. A student raised his hand and asked, “Is this like when you have to figure out how much wood you need for a wall in Minecraft?” I said I guessed so, and he spent the next few minutes explaining how a block is one meter cubed, and if you’re building a castle wall you have to calculate how many stacks of blocks you need, and then you have to account for the inventory space. That’s not a worksheet problem. That’s a real problem with a real budget and a real consequence—your wall doesn’t get built.
I didn’t run out and buy a classroom set of game consoles. But I did start paying attention to which games my students were already playing and how those games connected to what we were learning. My current curriculum includes Newton’s laws, so I asked a kid who plays Kerbal Space Program what he thought about thrust and orbit. He showed me on his phone how he’d designed a rocket that kept flipping. We talked about center of mass and drag. He wasn’t just reciting terms; he was adjusting variables and watching what happened.
That’s when I realized something. Games don’t teach science or math directly. They create a space where kids feel okay trying and failing and trying again, without the pressure of a grade or a timer. The problem solving comes from the gaming, but the teaching comes from the conversation around it.
This year, I decided to be more intentional. I set up a lunchtime STEM gaming group. No specific assignment. Just some kids who like games and me asking questions. I brought in a laptop with Minecraft Education Edition installed. The school IT person helped me set up a small server. We had about eight students, mostly boys, but a couple of girls too. And I didn’t have a plan. I just wanted to see what would happen.
One day, they decided to build a working lighthouse using redstone lamps and a daylight sensor. That took three sessions. They had to understand circuits, logic gates, and the fact that the sensor outputs a signal strength based on the light level. They figured out how to invert the signal so the light would turn on at night. I didn’t tell them any of that. I just listened and asked things like, “What happens if you put a repeater there?” or “Why do you think it’s flickering?”
It’s messy. It doesn’t look like a clean lesson plan. There are kids who get really into it and kids who just want to dig holes. And that’s fine, because digging holes in Minecraft still teaches volume and spatial reasoning if you’re counting blocks. But you have to be willing to let it be a little chaotic.
The biggest thing I’ve learned is that video games aren’t a reward or a break from learning. They’re a context. When a student is building a farm in Stardew Valley, they’re managing resources and planning seasonal crops. When they’re playing Factorio, they’re optimizing production lines. When they’re playing Portal, they’re solving spatial puzzles. But if I just say “go play Minecraft and learn physics,” that doesn’t work. The learning happens when I help them notice the patterns they’re already using.
Here’s a concrete example. Last week, I had a student show me a bridge he built. It collapsed in the middle because he didn’t account for weight. He was frustrated. I asked him what he would do differently. He said he’d use more supports. I asked how many more, and he said “like, twice as many.” We talked about why double might be overkill, but also why his gut instinct was reasonable. That’s a conversation about engineering stress and safety factors. It happened because a game glitched and his bridge fell into a ravine.
For parents, the takeaway is not that every child should play games. It’s that if your child is already playing, there’s a lot of learning happening underneath the surface, and you can help surface it. Ask them questions. Not “what did you learn?” but “why did you build it that way?” or “what happened when that fell over?” Those are real questions. They’re the same questions an engineer might ask.
For teachers, I’d say start small. You don’t need to be a gamer. I’m still not. But during free time or a warm-up, ask kids what they’re playing and show genuine curiosity. Keep a list of game titles and what they involve. You’ll start noticing patterns—many games involve systems, feedback loops, resource management, and spatial reasoning. Those are the building blocks of STEM thinking. You can build on that.
There are practical considerations too. School Wi-Fi might lag. Minecraft Education Edition requires licenses. Some families are skeptical about screen time. I’ve had parents say, “He plays enough games at home, why is he playing them at school?” And that’s fair. I try to make my use of games visible and purposeful. I send emails home before the lunchtime club starts, explaining that we’re using games as a springboard for discussion, not as a passive activity. And I keep it voluntary. No student is required to play. The ones who don’t end up drawing or doing puzzles, and that’s fine.
This is still evolving for me. I don’t have a polished unit. I have a lunchtime group, a few good discussions, and a growing appreciation for what my students already know when they walk into my classroom. Marcus still builds redstone contraptions at lunch. Yesterday, he explained to a sixth grader how to use comparators to measure the fullness of a chest. He used the word “data” four times in one sentence. I smiled, because that’s a lesson I didn’t plan, and a skill that won’t show up on a standardized test. But if we’re being honest, it’s the kind of thinking that matters in the real world.
I’m not sure where this goes next. Maybe I’ll try a project-based learning unit around game design. Maybe I’ll just keep asking questions and letting them lead. Either way, I’ve stopped seeing video games as the enemy of learning. They’re just another place where kids practice thinking—and my job is to help them notice it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Happens When a STEM Teacher Uses Video Games in Class