What Growth Hacks in Schools and Colleges Mean For Your Child’s Learning
I stood by the student ID booth at my daughter Lila’s community college orientation last August, stirring a lukewarm lemonade that had way more ice than lemon, and overheard an admissions manager lean in to a new faculty member and say, “We hit our fall enrollment target three weeks early. That TikTok growth hack beat the old high school counselor mailings by a mile.” I’d heard the term growth hacker before, talking about startups chasing quick user counts, but hearing it used casually at a public institution that serves 12,000 local students caught me off guard.
A few months before that, Lila was choosing between two early childhood education programs, and the smaller private college was all over her Instagram feed. The algorithm fed her short Reels of recent grads saying, “80% of our ed majors get full teaching offers before graduation.” That number was on every flyer, every personalized email, but when I called the admissions office to ask what counted as a full teaching offer, I found out the 80% only included students who transferred in with at least 30 credits already, and counted any full-time job, even nannying instead of classroom work. That’s a growth hack: tweak the data to sound more impressive, get more students to enroll, even if the information isn’t useful for the kids and parents trying to make a big decision.
I started noticing these hacks even earlier, when Lila was in 11th grade. Her high school rolled out a monthly attendance challenge: every homeroom with 95% attendance got a free pizza party. The announcements played every morning over the intercom, and teachers posted progress charts on the classroom door. One Wednesday in October, Lila woke up with a scratchy throat and a 101 fever, but she kept begging to go to school. Her homeroom was one absent day away from losing the party, and she didn’t want to be the person who ruined it for everyone. I ended up driving her, and when I checked in with the school nurse later, she admitted the district’s state funding is tied directly to average daily attendance, so hitting that 95% mark means thousands more dollars for the district that year. The pizza party wasn’t about getting kids excited to come to school—it was a low-cost growth hack to boost the school’s funding numbers.
It’s easy to paint all this as some big intentional harm, but it’s not that simple. Schools and colleges are operating on tighter budgets every year. They need to hit enrollment numbers to keep programs open, they need to hit performance metrics to keep funding flowing, so of course they’re looking for quick ways to grow those numbers. The problem isn’t that they want to grow—it’s that too often, the growth hack is designed to benefit the institution first, and the student’s needs end up second, and most parents don’t notice until it’s already affecting their kid.
I’ve picked up a few small, low-effort habits that help me spot this and adjust, no massive PTA activism required. First, any stat a school or college leads with on social media or its homepage? I spend 5 minutes digging for the fine print. If it’s a job placement rate, I check if it’s only for jobs in the student’s major, and how long after graduation they count it. If it’s a graduation rate, I check if it excludes transfer students or part-time students, who make up almost half of most community college populations. It takes five minutes of scrolling through the “about our data” page, and it’s way more useful than trusting the glossy marketing.
Second, if the school rolls out an incentive for kids that ties directly to a school metric, I talk through it with my kid specifically, and give them a clear out. After the attendance incident, I told Lila that next time she’s sick, we stay home no matter what, and I’ll buy her and her best friend a pizza after she recovers. The school gets to keep their average attendance number, but your health comes first, no guilt required. It’s a tiny swap, but it takes the pressure off the kid when the school is asking them to prioritize the institution’s goal over their own.
Third, if you see a hack that’s hurting a lot of kids, bring it up at the next PTA meeting or school board public comment. Last year, our local high school cut two art sections to add more test prep blocks before state testing, because their ranking on state test scores affects how many new incoming students they enroll. A group of 10 parents brought it up at the next board meeting, shared how many kids had already signed up for art that got cut, and they added one art section back the following semester. You don’t need a full campaign, just one specific example to get people paying attention to what’s being sacrificed for growth.
Last month, Lila came home from college and said her education department is doing a “growth push” for the program, and they’re offering a free $50 coffee gift card to any current student who refers a friend who enrolls. It’s not inherently a bad thing—more students means the program can keep their small class sizes, which benefits everyone already there. But it did make me ask Lila if the department was still offering the same number of student teaching spots for the extra incoming kids. They are, for now. I still check, though. Growth doesn’t have to come at the expense of what actually matters for kids. But it’s up to us, as parents, to keep an eye on the difference between a trick to boost numbers, and a change that actually helps our kids learn.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Growth Hacks in Schools and Colleges Mean For Your Child’s Learning