What Growth Hacking For Schools And Colleges Actually Means For Parents And Students
Last month, I sat in on a parent advisory meeting at my son’s public state university, stirring a lukewarm coffee I’d bought from the lobby vending machine, when the provost dropped the term “growth hacking” halfway through her update. I almost choked on my sip. I’d only ever heard that phrase tied to TikTok side hustles and influencer get-rich-quick schemes, not my kid’s pre-nursing degree requirements. I braced for a talk about boosting enrollment numbers or marketing the school better to out-of-state students. What I got instead was a list of small changes that have already made my son’s college experience easier, with no big price tag attached.
The first change she talked about was in the intro statistics department, which had long had a 25% first-year fail rate that dragged down hundreds of undergrads every semester, most of them working their way through school and already stretched thin. Budget freezes meant they couldn’t hire three more full-time tutors like they’d requested. Instead, a young lecturer who’d heard the term growth hacking suggested a tiny, zero-cost test: post 2-minute pre-lecture clips on the school’s learning portal and TikTok that outlined what would be covered that day, and called out one common mistake most students made on the previous problem set. No fancy production, just the lecturer talking to a whiteboard in her office, filmed on her phone.
A semester later, the fail rate had dropped 12%. When I got home that night, I asked my son, who’s taking intro stats this year, if he’d seen the clips. He nodded around a bite of Cheerios, and said he watches them most mornings while he waits for the campus bus. “It stops me from panicking when the professor starts talking about p-values,” he said. “I already know what we’re doing, so I don’t spend the whole first 10 minutes trying to catch up.”
I saw the same approach at my niece’s local middle school a few weeks later, where I help organize volunteer events. For years, less than half of parents showed up for fall parent-teacher conferences. Most working parents couldn’t get off work for the 3pm to 5pm weekday slots, and half the paper sign-up forms sent home with kids got lost in backpacks anyway. Instead of approving a huge new outreach budget, the PTA tested three small changes: add 10-minute slots between 6pm and 8pm over two evenings, send sign-up reminders via text instead of just email, and let parents request a 10-minute phone call instead of coming in person. No extra cost, just a little rearranging of teachers’ schedules. That year, attendance jumped 40%. My sister, who works full-time retail and had never made it to a conference in three years, got a text reminder during her lunch break, signed up for a 6pm phone call, and left the conversation with a clear plan to help my niece catch up on her reading. She still talks about how much of a difference that made.
A lot of people push back on growth hacking in education, and I get it. It sounds like just another corporate buzzword, an attempt to run schools like they’re startups instead of learning communities. And to be fair, some growth hacks for schools are just that—fancy marketing tricks to get more tuition money, with no benefit for current students. But the good ones, the ones that stick, aren’t about that. They’re about fixing the small, annoying problems that everyone notices but no one gets around to fixing, because everyone’s waiting for a big budget overhaul or a district-wide policy change.
You don’t have to work at a college or be a school administrator to use these small changes, either. If you’re a 4th grade teacher tired of kids disrupting class because they forgot their textbooks, leave 5 extra copies at the front of the room. That’s a growth hack. If you’re a parent tired of the school only sending updates when something’s wrong, suggest the homeroom teacher send one quick positive text a month to every parent. It takes 10 extra minutes, no cost, and makes a huge difference for working parents who don’t hear from the school otherwise.
Not all of these tests work, either. The university tried a free coffee drop-in for first-years during finals last year, set it up in the student union, and only 20 kids showed up. Most people were studying in the library and didn’t want to walk across campus. They adjusted: moved it to the library basement, swapped half the coffee for granola bars and fruit snacks, and 120 kids showed up the next semester. There’s no magic formula, just try something small, see if it works, and change it if it doesn’t.
Growth hacking doesn’t fix the big problems in education. It won’t fill the budget gap for special education services, or bring down tuition, or fix understaffing. That’s still something we have to fight for on a bigger level. But it does clear away a lot of the small, unnecessary friction that makes school harder than it needs to be for kids and parents. Right now, the local high school is testing opening the cafeteria for quiet study on Saturday mornings, just to give kids a space that’s not their bedroom or a crowded coffee shop. We don’t know if it’ll stick. We’re just going to count how many kids show up the first month, and adjust the time if we need to. That’s all it is.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What Growth Hacking For Schools And Colleges Actually Means For Parents And Students