What causes education spending gaps across genders in Laos? A teacher’s firsthand look
The smell of burnt sticky rice hung over our small village school yard in northern Laos last November as I stacked donated school supplies on a weathered wooden bench. Twelve-year-old Mai hung back by the banana tree, twisting the frayed hem of her too-short school uniform before she walked over. “Do you have an extra math notebook?” she asked. “Mine’s filled all the way through, and my brother got the new one we bought at the market last week. I’m writing my homework on the back of old fertilizer bags right now.”
I’d spotted small, consistent differences like this in the three months I’d been volunteering at the school, but that request stuck with me. I walked back to Mai’s family’s stilt house with her after classes that day, carrying two extra notebooks I’d stowed in my pack. Her mother sat on the bamboo porch weaving cotton scarves to sell to tourists an hour down the paved road, and when I mentioned Mai’s need for more supplies, she didn’t apologize or soften the truth. She just shrugged, her hands still moving over the loom. “We make about $200 a year between the farm and the scarves. After rice and medicine for the kids, that’s only enough to cover school fees, a new uniform, and supplies for one child. We pick my son. He’ll inherit this farm, he needs to learn to count the harvest and read seed packets. Mai will move to her husband’s village when she’s 15 or 16. What good is extra school for her?”
I’d read reports about education spending gaps across genders in Laos before I arrived, but that conversation turned statistics into something tangible. It’s not that rural parents here don’t value their daughters, it’s that when every dollar has to stretch further than you can reach, choices are forced by long-standing local norms and economic realities. From the data the district education office shared with me, the average rural Lao household spends almost 30% more on a boy’s education than a girl’s, even when total household income is the same. That gap shows up first in small, easy to miss details: new rubber sandals for boys, holey hand-me-downs for girls; crisp new textbooks for boys, books held together with packing tape for girls. By secondary school, when fees and supply costs go up, that gap adds up: twice as many girls as boys drop out before finishing 9th grade.
Once our small volunteer team and the local school staff saw how consistent this pattern was, we started testing small, low-cost changes to even things out, no big grants or fancy programs required. The first change was a simple supply swap. Instead of opening up all donated uniforms, notebooks, and shoes to first-come first-served, we let girls pick first. It took an extra hour of sorting once a month, and cost nothing at all. In the first year we ran the swap, 18 more girls finished the full primary school year than the year before, because they didn’t have to drop out just because they didn’t have the right supplies or a uniform that fit.
Next, the village head suggested starting monthly 30-minute tea meetings for parents, instead of bringing in outside experts to lecture about gender equality. We just invited local parents who had kept their daughters in school to share their own experiences over steamed sticky rice and tea. Last spring, one mother whose daughter finished high school and got a job as a front desk manager at an eco-lodge in Luang Prabang talked about how her daughter sends $100 home every month—more than the whole family makes from the rice farm in a year. Another father said his daughter uses her math skills to track his vegetable sales at the weekly town market, and he’s made 15% more the last two years because he no longer loses track of what he owes for seeds or what customers owe him. These stories, from people other parents already trust, have shifted more opinions than any flyer or workshop ever could.
The biggest change has come from small local businesses in the nearest tourist town, who started a targeted scholarship fund just for low-income girls. The scholarships don’t just cover school fees and supplies—they also give a small monthly stipend to the family, to make up for the labor the girl would have contributed planting rice or weaving scarves if she stayed home. That addresses the hidden cost of keeping a girl in school that most outside programs miss: even if tuition is free, a family can’t afford to lose that extra help when they’re already living paycheck to paycheck.
I left the village in December, but I still chat with the head teacher every couple of weeks over Facebook. Last week he told me Mai got one of the first local scholarships. She’s starting 8th grade next month, and she has a full set of new notebooks and a uniform that fits her now. There’s still a long way to go. Norms don’t change overnight, and there are still dozens of girls in the district whose families can’t afford to keep them in school. The spending gap between boys and girls is still there, even with all the small changes we’ve made. But these low-cost, community-led steps are adding up, one notebook, one parent conversation, one scholarship at a time. It’s slow, and it’s not perfect, but it’s changing things for more girls every year.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What causes education spending gaps across genders in Laos