What AI in education actually looks like for your kid: a journalist’s on-the-ground perspective
I was slouched in a back-row plastic chair at my local middle school last month, watching a 7th grade English class work through personal narrative essays, when I saw Mia, a quiet 12-year-old with a neon-pink hair clip, lean over to her friend and whisper, “Did you use ChatGPT for your hook?”
The teacher, Ms. Lopez, was circling the room, sipping lukewarm coffee from a chipped cat-themed reusable cup, and I held my breath. For months I’d been reporting on AI in education, and the narrative I heard most from parents was that any AI use equals cheating, that schools were either ignoring the problem or banning it outright, leaving kids to sneak around behind everyone’s back. I expected Ms. Lopez to swoop in, issue a warning, maybe even take the phone.
Instead, she paused next to the table, nodded at the screen, and said, “Show me what you did after that first line.” Mia’s friend, Lila, tugged the laptop toward her and pulled up her draft. The hook was a generic AI line about the nerves before a first varsity soccer game. But right after that, Lila had added three paragraphs about how she’d gotten so nervous she threw up on the referee’s white sneakers, then still managed to score the game-winning goal. The whole section was messy, specific, and so her it made me smile. “That hook’s fine,” Ms. Lopez said. “The part you wrote after? That’s the essay. Good work.” She moved on to help a kid who was stuck, and that was that.
As a journalist who’s spent the last three months talking to teachers, administrators, parents and students across five local districts about AI, that moment stuck with me more than any school board meeting or viral thinkpiece. Most of the conversation I see outside of classrooms is all panic: AI will ruin writing, AI will make kids lazy, AI will destroy education as we know it. But what I’ve seen on the ground is a lot more messy, a lot more ordinary, and a lot less scary than the headlines make it out to be.
I’m also a parent to a 10-year-old in elementary school, so I get the panic. A few weeks ago, he came to me asking for help with his science fair project on volcanoes. I told him to brainstorm some ideas, and he pulled open ChatGPT on his iPad to ask for a list of experiments he could do with pantry staples. My first instinct was to snap the iPad shut and tell him to do it himself. But I stopped, and I asked him what he planned to do next. He said the AI gave him five ideas, he picked the one that used vinegar and baking soda, but the recipe said to use a half cup of baking soda, which he thought was too much. He spent two days testing different amounts, and when he wrote his final report, he wrote all about how the first test overflowed and got baking soda all over our kitchen rug. AI didn’t do the project for him. It just cut out the 20 minutes he would have spent scrolling Pinterest looking for ideas that worked with what we had at home.
That’s the shift most teachers I’ve talked to are making: they don’t treat AI as a cheating weapon, they treat it like any other tool kids use to do work—Google, spell check, a tutor helping you work through a problem. The practical change most are making is simple, and it’s something parents can adopt at home too: instead of only grading or judging the final product, they focus on the process.
For example, I talked to a high school algebra teacher who told me she caught three kids using AI to solve all their homework problems last fall. Instead of giving them all zeroes and sending them to the office, she had them each come in after school for a 20-minute check-in. She asked each kid to pull up their homework, point to a problem, and walk her through what AI did to solve it, and where it got the answer wrong (AI messes up math more often than most people realize). Two of the three didn’t understand the steps at all, so she walked through them with them, and they re-did the problems on their own after that. Both ended up getting Bs on the next unit test. That’s a far cry from the zero tolerance policies a lot of people assume schools are using.
For parents who don’t know how to start talking about AI with their kids, the simplest thing I’ve heard recommended is to change the question you ask. Instead of opening with an accusatory “Did you use AI to do this homework?” try asking “What parts of this did AI help you with, and what did you change after that?” It’s a small shift, but it takes the conversation from a fight to a conversation. If you’re curious but don’t know much about AI, just ask your kid to show you how they use it. I spent 10 minutes with my son last week asking AI to write a silly story about our pet goldfish, then we rewrote the ending together. It took no time, and I left with a clear sense of how he uses it, no fancy tech degree required.
That’s not to say there aren’t real problems. I’ve talked to underfunded schools that don’t have the staff or training to update their lesson plans, so AI use is just going unchecked, and some kids really do cheat their way through whole units. I’ve had parents tell me they can’t afford the fancy AI detection tools some schools use, and those tools often flag work as AI-written when it’s not, hurting kids who didn’t do anything wrong. Those are real issues that schools and districts still need to work out.
I still check my kid’s homework sometimes, squinting at sentences that sound too polished for a 10-year-old. I still see parents panicking in my neighborhood Facebook group, asking if they should ban AI at home, or how they can make sure their kid isn’t falling behind. No one has all the answers right now. This is all still new, and everyone is figuring it out as they go. But that day in the 7th grade classroom, I watched Lila read her essay out loud, and the whole class laughed when she got to the part about throwing up on the referee. That AI hook got her started, but the part that made everyone laugh was all hers. AI doesn’t write that part. Kids still do.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What AI in education actually looks like for your kid: a journalist’s on-the-ground perspective