Latest News : From in-depth articles to actionable tips, we've gathered the knowledge you need to nurture your child's full potential. Let's build a foundation for a happy and bright future.

What AI in Classrooms Actually Looks Like: A Journalist’s On-the-Ground Perspective for Parents

Family Education Eric Jones 59 views

What AI in Classrooms Actually Looks Like: A Journalist’s On-the-Ground Perspective for Parents

I sat crammed in a back row of a 10th grade English class in Portland last October, notebook open on my lap, there to report on how homework has changed since the pandemic. The teacher posted the prompt on the whiteboard: Write the opening paragraph of a personal narrative about a time you messed up something that mattered. Fifteen seconds later, I glanced at the laptop of the 16-year-old girl next to me, and watched her type the exact prompt into ChatGPT.

I tensed up, same as any parent would. I’ve sat through enough PTA meetings where AI is called the end of critical thinking, the biggest cheating scandal our schools have ever faced. But then I watched what she did next. She read the two paragraphs the AI spit out, frowned, deleted the first one entirely, and crossed out three lines from the second that sounded “too much like a college essay,” as she later told me. She rewrote the opening line to say “I still get nervous thinking about the time I forgot my little sister at the grocery store” instead of the AI’s “Failure has a way of sticking with you long after the moment passes.” She adjusted the whole thing to sound like her, then hit save.

That moment was nothing like the panic I’d read about in op-eds or heard around my neighborhood dinner table. Over the next three months, I visited six different K-12 classrooms across the Pacific Northwest for my reporting, talked to a dozen teachers, 30-some students, and half a dozen administrators, and walked away with a very different picture of AI in education than the one I had when I started. I’m a parent of a 7th grader, so I went into this looking for answers I could actually use, not just takeaways for a story.

After class that day, Ms. Henderson, the 10th grade English teacher, leaned against her desk and told me she doesn’t ban AI. “I’d be fighting a losing battle if I did,” she said. “Kids are going to use it whether I say so or not. My job isn’t to stop them from using a tool that’s everywhere in the world they’re growing up into. It’s to teach them how to use it right.” Last semester, she told me, a boy turned in a flawless essay on To Kill a Mockingbird that she instantly knew was AI. It had none of his usual run-on sentences, none of his weird tangents about basketball that he always sneaks into assignments. Instead of failing him, she called him over after class, pointed out what she noticed, and gave him a new assignment: go through the essay line by line, mark which parts are AI, rewrite every AI line in his own words, then come back and talk to her about what Atticus Finch’s choice meant to him. He did it, and they ended up having one of the best conversations she’d had all semester about the book.

That stuck with me. For months, I’d been worrying that my 12-year-old son would use AI to cheat on his homework, that he’d never learn how to write a good paragraph or work through a hard math problem if he could just ask a robot to do it for him. After talking to Ms. Henderson, I tried something new the next time my son brought home a big writing assignment for social studies. Instead of hovering and asking if he was cheating, I just sat down next to him and said, “Show me what you’ve got so far, and tell me if you used any AI to help with it.”

He hesitated for a second, then admitted he’d used it to brainstorm three different outlines for his project about the civil rights movement. He didn’t like any of the AI’s outlines, so he made his own, but he said it helped him get unstuck when he couldn’t figure out how to organize his notes. I didn’t get mad. We talked through what felt fair: using AI to brainstorm, fix grammar, or get unstuck on a problem is okay. Copying what it writes word for word and turning it in as your own isn’t. That’s the rule we have now, and it’s worked so far.

Most teachers I talked to don’t care if kids use AI for the busy work. What they care about is that kids can do the thinking. A lot of them have changed their assignments to reflect that: more writing done in class, where teachers can see you work through it. More presentations where you have to explain your process, not just turn in a final product. More projects that are based on your own personal experience, which AI can’t fake. That personal narrative assignment Lila was working on? AI can write a generic story about failing, but it can’t write the story about forgetting your sister at the grocery store.

The practical stuff I’ve taken away, that I tell other parents about, is really simple. First, stop asking your kid “did you use AI” like it’s a yes or no question that means they cheated. Instead, ask “how did you use AI on this project” and ask them to walk you through what they changed, what they kept, what they did themselves. That opens a conversation instead of putting them on the defensive. Second, don’t ban AI at home. If you ban it, they’ll just hide it from you, and you won’t get a chance to teach them how to use it right. Set clear rules about what’s okay and what’s not, and stick to them. Third, ask your kid’s teacher what their policy is, instead of assuming it’s all or nothing. A lot of teachers have middle ground policies that most parents don’t even know about.

I still don’t have all the answers. Last month, my son turned in a book report that had a couple of sentences that sounded way too polished for him, and when I asked, he admitted he let AI fix his grammar after he wrote it. I didn’t take points away at home, we just talked about how fixing grammar is fine, but the ideas have to be his. That worked this time, but I know there will be other times where we’ll have to adjust the rules as we go.

No one has this all sorted out yet, not teachers, not schools, not parents. The panic I see online and in PTA groups makes it sound like AI is going to ruin a whole generation of kids, but what I saw in classrooms was just kids and teachers figuring it out, one assignment at a time. It’s messy, it’s not perfect, but it’s not the end of education, either. It’s just the next thing we all have to work through together, one conversation at a time.

Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » What AI in Classrooms Actually Looks Like: A Journalist’s On-the-Ground Perspective for Parents