The first time I saw the post, my stomach dropped. It was a photo of a half-eaten lunch, captioned with a friend’s name and a string of laughing-crying emojis. My son, Leo, had posted it in a group chat for his fifth-grade class. He was sitting on the couch next to me, completely oblivious, scrolling through videos on his tablet. He wasn’t trying to be mean. He was trying to be funny.
I, however, was trying to figure out how to handle it. Do I take the tablet? Do I lecture him? I had read all the articles about digital citizenship, but they mostly felt like vague warnings about a world I was barely keeping up with. I didn’t want to ban him from the online spaces where his friends were connecting, but I also couldn’t let him learn these lessons by hurting someone else’s feelings.
That night, after he was asleep, I did some digging. I wasn’t looking for a parental control app that would block everything. I was looking for a way to build a little fence around the playground, a way to slow things down. That’s when I stumbled upon the settings on the very platform his class was using for their group projects: a feature for post and comment approval.
It felt a little heavy-handed at first, like reading his diary. But the more I thought about it, the more it felt less like surveillance and more like a training wheel. He was learning to ride a bike in a busy neighborhood; I wasn’t going to just let go of the seat and hope for the best.
The next afternoon, I sat down with him. I didn’t start with the lunch photo. Instead, I said, “Hey, I was looking at the class app, and I think we need a new system. From now on, before you post something or comment on someone else’s post, it’s going to come to me for a quick check.”
He groaned. “Mom, that’s so lame. No one else has to do that.”
“Maybe not,” I said, keeping my voice even. “But this is our rule for now. Think of me as your editor.” I showed him how the approval setting worked. I’d get a notification on my phone with his post or comment. I could approve it, or I could send it back with a note. We agreed that I would try to be fast, and that if I had a question, I would just ask him about it, not automatically reject it.
The first few days were quiet. Then came the test. He sent me a comment to approve on a friend’s drawing of a dragon. His comment was: “This is okay I guess.”
I sent it back with a note: “What do you really think of it?”
A minute later, a revised comment popped up: “That’s a cool dragon! I like the fire.”
He came into the kitchen. “Is that better?”
“Yeah,” I said. “It is. ‘This is okay I guess’ can sound a little…unfriendly, even if you don’t mean it that way.”
He shrugged. “I just typed the first thing I thought.”
And that, I realized, was the whole point. The approval setting wasn’t a punishment. It was a pause button. It was a chance for him to think about his “first thought” before it became a permanent part of someone else’s day. A few days later, he sent a post that was just a blurry photo of our dog. The caption was “my dog is so dumb lol.” I approved it. It was harmless. He needed to know I wasn’t going to nitpick every single thing. The goal was to help him gauge the temperature, not to make him afraid to speak.
Around this same time, I noticed something else. His class feed was getting cluttered. It was a mix of homework questions, random memes, and photos of kids’ pets. It was hard to find the information about the science project. I mentioned this to his teacher, Mrs. Davison, during a parent-teacher conference. She sighed and said she was seeing the same thing.
“I’m spending more time moderating the feed than teaching,” she admitted. “I’ve thought about just turning it off, but they use it for so much good stuff, too.”
I told her about the approval system we were using at home. She nodded thoughtfully. “I can’t approve every comment for every student,” she said. “But you’ve given me an idea.”
The next week, she introduced “flairs” to the class platform. She created a few simple categories that students had to choose from before they could post. There was a “Question for the Class” flair, a “Look at This!” flair for sharing cool stuff, and a “Project Help” flair. Suddenly, the feed was organized. You could see at a glance what a post was about. The random “look at my dog” posts didn’t disappear, but they were now tagged, so you knew what you were clicking on. The homework questions were easy to find.
The flair system did something else, too. It made the kids more intentional. They had to pause and ask themselves, “What is this post for?” It was a tiny moment of reflection, a cousin to the approval pause Leo and I were using.
We’re a few months into this now. The approval setting is still on for Leo. He still grumbles about it occasionally, especially when I’m slow to approve a comment and he’s waiting. But last week, he was over at a friend’s house and he called me. “Mom, can I post something?” he asked. “It’s a video of us doing a skateboard trick.”
I approved it from my phone in the grocery store line. It wasn’t a big deal. The fence was still there, but it was starting to feel less like a cage and more like a railing on a staircase. It was just a quiet support in the background.
I don’t know when we’ll take the approval setting off. Part of me wants to keep it on until he’s eighteen. The other part of me knows that at some point, the training wheels have to come off. For now, we’re still in this in-between stage, this place where he’s learning that his words have weight and his posts have an audience, and I’m learning that the best way to help him isn’t to shout warnings from the sidelines, but to walk alongside him and occasionally point out a pothole. It’s not a perfect system, and it’s not a permanent one. It’s just what’s working for us right now.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » The first time I saw the post, my stomach dropped