Testing A 60-Minute Math Workshop For 9-11 Year Olds: What I’ve Learned And I Need Your Feedback
The bell just rang for after-school club last Wednesday, and I stood by the multi-purpose room table sorting foam dice and grid paper, waiting to see who’d show up for the trial run of my new 60-minute math workshop. I had 12 kids signed up, all between 9 and 11, from different local primary schools—some who’d told their parents math “was the worst subject” and some who begged for extra tricky problems to mess around with after school. The table was still sticky from the cake sale the day before, I’d grabbed a pack of lemon cookies from the supermarket on my way in, and my own 10-year-old son was leaning against the wall pretending he wasn’t curious about what I’d planned.
I’ve been a Year 5/6 teaching assistant for seven years, and I’ve watched the same pattern play out over and over again by the time kids hit 9 or 10. They move past basic addition and multiplication into fractions, area, ratios, and word problems that require more than just memorizing a step-by-step formula. Some kids check out entirely because worksheets feel pointless and the “you either get it or you don’t” vibe sticks them with a “bad at math” label that’s hard to shake. Even kids who get good grades often just memorize steps without actually understanding why the math works. Most extra math support is either an hour of extra worksheets for struggling kids, or advanced tutoring for kids who want to speed ahead. I wanted to build something that worked for every kid, fit into an after-school slot without eating up the whole evening, and felt nothing like regular class. That’s how I ended up with this 60-minute workshop plan.
The trial run went like this: 10 minutes of low-stakes warm-up, 25 minutes of a group problem-solving challenge, 15 minutes of group sharing, and 10 minutes for kids to fill out quick, anonymous exit notes. The warm-up was a fraction dice game—each kid rolls four dice, makes two fractions, multiplies them, and whoever has the highest number wins that round. No points counted for anything, no grades, just yelling and teasing when someone rolled a 1 and a 6. Within two minutes, even the quiet 11-year-old who’d told me he never speaks in math class was leaning across the table to show off his 5/6 times 4/5.
The challenge was the garden problem: groups had to design a 100-square-foot garden on grid paper, with three separate plots for carrots, lettuce, and beans. The carrot plot had to be 2/5 of the total area, the lettuce 1/4, and the beans whatever was left. There was no right way to shape the plots, no limit on how you split it up. I’d planned for 25 minutes, but one group finished rearranging their plots in 18 minutes and started messing around with adding a shed that took up another 10 square feet, while another group was still arguing about whether 2/5 of 100 was 20 or 40 at the 28-minute mark. I ended up stretching the challenge by three minutes to let them work it out, which threw off the whole timeline at the end.
When we did the share-out, the comments were more honest than I expected. One kid said, “It’s weird not checking the back of the book to see if I’m wrong. I kept thinking I messed up even when I didn’t.” Another boy said the warm-up was too loud, and he couldn’t focus with everyone yelling. My own son, who says he’s bad at math because he can’t recite his times tables as fast as his classmates, said he liked that he could draw the plots any shape he wanted instead of just writing numbers.
After everyone left, I sat there picking at crumbs and reading the exit notes. Eight out of 12 kids said they liked this more than regular math class. Three said working in groups was annoying because one person does all the work or someone else bosses you around. One said the warm-up was a waste of time and we should just jump into the challenge.
From there, I’ve already made a few small changes: I added an option to do the challenge individually if kids don’t want to work in a group, I built a 3-minute stretch break halfway through to let kids wiggle, and I’m offering a quiet version of the warm-up for kids who don’t like noise. For parents or teachers who want to test the core idea at home, it’s low effort: all you need is a handful of dice, some grid paper, and an hour on a weekend or after school. The biggest thing I’ve found so far is that ditching the “right answer” pressure for even an hour changes how kids talk about math. You don’t need fancy supplies or a teaching degree to try that part with your own kid; just skip the step of marking wrong answers and ask how they got their result instead.
But I’m still working out a lot of kinks, which is why I’m reaching out for feedback. I’m rolling this workshop out to four more groups next term, and I want to make it work for as many kids as possible. Is 60 minutes after a full day of school too long for your 9-11 year old? Would you prefer 45 minutes? If you’re a teacher, what’s the biggest gap you see in math learning for Year 5 and 6 that I haven’t addressed here? If you’re a parent, what’s one thing your kid complains about when it comes to math that I should build around? Do kids need more practice with basic fact recall worked into the activities, or more time working on open-ended problem solving? Would you sign your kid up for a monthly 60-minute workshop like this, or would that be too much extra on top of school and other activities?
Last night I was cleaning out my supply bin in the spare room, and I found the stack of exit notes from the trial, tucked under a pile of extra graph paper. I still have half the pack of lemon cookies left in the cupboard, and a jar of extra foam dice I picked up on sale. It’s not going to be perfect, and that’s okay. Right now, I’m just looking for input from other people who spend time with 9 to 11 year olds, to make this something that actually works for them.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Testing A 60-Minute Math Workshop For 9-11 Year Olds: What I’ve Learned And I Need Your Feedback