Teaching Kids Ethics: Why Memorizing Rules Isn’t Enough and What Works Instead
The gym bleachers smelled like spilled lemonade and leftover pretzel crumbs last month, when I stuck around after school to count canned goods for our annual food drive. I was halfway through updating our class’s total on the whiteboard when I spotted two of my fifth graders hunched behind the stack of donation bins, shoving cans from one bin into a crumpled grocery bag. Mia’s jeans still had glitter stuck to the knee from that morning’s art project, and Javi kept glancing over his shoulder at the other fifth grade class’s bin, which was marked with a big 127 in sharpie—two cans higher than our 125.
I walked over instead of calling out, and both kids froze. Javi’s cheeks went pink, but Mia held her ground, said “Ms. Henderson, wait, it’s not what it looks like.”
It almost was, though. They’d pulled 12 expired cans from the other class’s bin. The top prize for the drive was a new class basketball, the kind with the school logo that every group begs for all year. Our class was two cans behind. So far, it looked like a clear-cut ethics test: cheating is wrong, end of story. For most of my ten years teaching, that’s how I would have handled it. I’d tell them they broke the rule, send them to put the cans back, and talk to the class the next day about why cheating hurts everyone. That’s basic ethics, right? We teach kids “don’t lie, don’t cheat, don’t steal, be kind” and that’s supposed to be enough.
But that day, I sat down on the sticky bleachers next to them and asked them to explain. Javi was the one who got the shelter to come pick up our donations last year, and he remembered the volunteer saying they throw out any dented or expired canned goods, no exceptions. “Mr. Torres’s kids just grabbed whatever was in the back of their pantries,” he said. “Those 12 cans are all expired. They’re useless. Why does their class get to count them toward their total? That’s not a real win.” Mia nodded: “We didn’t take any good cans. We just took the garbage they shouldn’t have counted anyway.”
Suddenly it wasn’t a clear-cut rule question anymore. It was an ethical problem, the messy kind that doesn’t have a yes or no answer. That’s when I realized how much time we spend teaching kids basic rules, and how little time we spend teaching them to work through these problems on their own.
I didn’t give them the answer. I just asked three questions I’ve started using when these situations pop up, that any parent or teacher can use too. First I asked: Who all is affected by what you’re doing here, and what does each person need? They thought for a minute, and listed them out: our class needs the basketball, the other class wants the basketball too, the shelter needs good food that people can actually eat, and the kids who brought the bad cans were just trying to help, so they shouldn’t get in trouble. Second question: Is there another option that fixes more problems than this one does? Third: If every kid in this school did what you’re planning to do, what would happen?
They sat there for ten minutes talking through it. They first thought about just telling Mr. Torres the cans were bad and asking him to remove them from his count. But Mia pointed out that he might think we were just trying to cheat to win, and he’d say no. Then Javi said we had 15 extra good cans that kids brought after we hit our initial goal. What if we gave 12 of those to Mr. Torres to replace the bad ones? That way, his total stays the same, the shelter gets 12 more good cans instead of 12 bad ones, and we still get to keep our count. If the numbers still work out after that, whoever wins wins fair and square.
I walked over with them to talk to Mr. Torres, and he thought the plan made sense. When we added everything up, we ended up one can ahead, so our class got the basketball. No one was upset, the shelter got 12 more usable donations, and the kids didn’t just get a lecture about cheating. They solved a problem.
I’ve started bringing this approach home too, when my own 13 year old brings home messy problems from middle school. Last week he told me a friend of his was cheating on weekly math quizzes, and he didn’t know what to do. I didn’t say “cheating is wrong, you have to tell the teacher” the way I would have a few years ago. I asked the same three questions. He ended up talking to his friend first, telling him he’d help him study before the next quiz instead of going straight to the teacher. That wasn’t the answer I would have picked, but it worked for everyone involved.
The practical part is this: you don’t need fancy lesson plans or big workshops to do this. Next time your kid comes to you with a messy situation, don’t lead with the rule. Ask those three questions: Who is affected and what do they need? What other options do you have? What would happen if you chose each option? It doesn’t take any extra time, and it doesn’t require you to have the perfect answer.
Some days it doesn’t work out perfectly. Last month a group of my kids worked through a problem about excluding another kid from their birthday party, and they still ended up making the wrong choice. But even then, they could tell me why they chose what they did, and what they’d do differently next time. That’s more than they got when I just told them “excluding people is mean” and sent them on their way.
We don’t know what kind of ethical problems kids will face when they grow up. The rules we teach them now won’t cover every situation. What they do need is practice working through the gray parts, one problem at a time. It’s messy, and it doesn’t always end with a perfect win, but it’s sticking with them more than any list of rules ever did.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Teaching Kids Ethics: Why Memorizing Rules Isn’t Enough and What Works Instead