Teacher explains: what should stay shared when learning becomes more personalized
Last month, I stood at the back of my 4th grade classroom watching reading rotations, and caught Mia slumping over her tablet, clicking through her personalized reading playlist faster than she should. She was supposed to be working through a set of poems matched to her independent reading level, hitting her fluency goals one step at a time, but every 10 seconds she glanced over at the round table where Javi and Lila were arguing about whether the wolf in their group novel was actually misunderstood. When I walked over and asked if she needed help, she mumbled, “This is just me and my tablet. No one cares what I think about my poems.”
I’ve worked in schools that have pushed personalized learning for years, and I get why it’s helpful. It meets kids where they are, it lets them move at their own pace, it cuts down on kids being bored when they’re ahead or embarrassed when they’re behind. But more and more, I’ve noticed we’ve cut out a lot of the shared parts of learning to make room for all that individualization. That afternoon after class, I thought about what Mia said, and then a week later, Mia’s mom brought up the same tension at our parent-teacher conference. They use an adaptive math app for after-school practice that adjusts to Mia’s level, and Mia keeps asking if her 2nd grade little brother can sit with her and do it together. The app’s instructions say each kid needs to stick to their own personalized path to make progress, so Mom says no, and Mia ends up sitting in her room sulking instead of doing her work.
I started testing small changes over the last two months, keeping our personalized skill and goal tracks but carving out small bits of shared time that don’t require everyone to be working on the same thing. The first thing we kept shared is the big questions that work for any level of work. Every day after 40 minutes of individual work on personalized playlists, we stop for 15 minutes and talk about one question that everyone can answer from whatever they’re working on. It might be “What’s one thing your character did that you would have done differently?” or “What’s the most surprising fact you learned this week?” or “What’s one part of your work that was harder than you expected?” Mia can talk about the speaker in her poem, Javi can talk about the wolf in his novel, and a kid working on a personalized math project about measuring can talk about how surprising it was that their desk was longer than they guessed. No one has to be reading the same book or working on the same unit to join in. It takes almost no extra planning, and it gives kids that chance to be heard that Mia was missing.
The second thing we keep shared is being stuck. Personalized learning systems are built to let kids work through problems on their own, step by step, and that’s good for building independence. But what I’ve seen is that when every kid is working on their own path, kids start to think being stuck is just their own problem, a sign they’re falling behind their personal goal. Now we do a weekly “sticky note stuck share” at the start of Friday class. Everyone writes one thing they got stuck on this week, no names needed, and we stick them all on the front board. We pick three at random, and everyone gets to chime in with a trick that’s worked for them when they’ve been stuck. Last week, one note said “I can’t remember when to use a comma vs. a semicolon” and another said “I don’t know what to do when my drawing keeps smudging” and another said “I keep forgetting my multiplication facts for 7.” A kid who struggles with math shared that he writes 7s on his hand when he’s practicing, and that helped the third kid. Mia shared that she just takes a 2 minute stretch break and comes back when she’s stuck on grammar, and that worked for the first kid. For parents at home, this translates easy: just add a 5 minute “what stuck you today” round to dinner time, no matter what each kid is working on for homework or homeschool.
The third small thing we keep shared is tiny celebrations. Personalized platforms give out digital badges and progress notifications that only the kid (and sometimes the parent) sees. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it doesn’t compare to the whole room pausing for 10 seconds to cheer when someone hits a goal they’ve been working on for a month. When Mia hit her reading fluency goal a couple weeks ago, she got her digital badge, then she got to pick two people to high-five her, and everyone else clapped once loud. It took 12 seconds, and she talked about it at dinner that night, her mom told me. At home, this can be as simple as pausing whatever you’re doing to let everyone say one small good thing about the kid who hit a goal, even if it’s not a goal anyone else is working on right now.
It’s not all perfect. Some weeks we have state testing to cram in, and we skip the daily 15 minute share three days in a row, and I can feel the energy shift. Kids get quieter, they’re more likely to say “I can’t do this” when they get stuck, instead of asking a friend. I still believe personalized learning works for meeting kids’ individual needs, but I don’t buy the idea that every part of learning has to be tailored to one kid. The shared parts don’t hold anyone back. They just make learning feel less like a solo race and more like something we all do together. We’re still adjusting, still figuring out how much shared time works without throwing off the individual progress kids need. But so far, the kids don’t ask for much more than 15 minutes a day to talk to each other, instead of just to their tablets.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Teacher explains: what should stay shared when learning becomes more personalized