Should Schools Start Later? What One Middle School Teacher Learned From A Schedule Change
I stood by my classroom door on the first day of our district’s new later start pilot, wiping coffee off my lesson plan clipboard, when Javi walked in. “Morning, Ms. Henderson,” he said, grinning, and pulled his Chromebook straight out of his bag. I did a double take. Twelve months earlier, that same kid would stumble in 10 minutes late, a 44-ounce Mountain Dew sweating in one hand, drop his bag, and face-plant on his desk before the bell even finished ringing.
I’ve taught 7th grade language arts at this suburban Ohio middle school for 12 years. Before the pilot, our first period started at 7:45 a.m. It was a running staff joke that first period lessons were just glorified naptime. I’d count heads on desks every Monday: usually 5 out of 28. Some kids would fake a stomach ache to go sit in the nurse’s office just to catch 20 extra minutes of sleep. At fall parent-teacher conferences that year, Javi’s mom told me she’d tried everything to get him on an earlier schedule: no screens after 10 p.m., melatonin, starting homework right after school. He just couldn’t fall asleep before 12:30 a.m., and he had to be up at 6:15 a.m. to catch the bus. That’s just how 12-year-old brains work, she said, exhausted.
When the district proposed shifting middle school start time to 8:30 a.m. (moving elementary start earlier to avoid doubling the bus fleet), it split our community right down the middle. Working parents yelled at school board meetings that they had to be at work by 8 a.m. and couldn’t supervise their kids for an extra hour at home alone. Coaches complained practice would end too late, cutting into homework time. I was on the fence: I was sick of waking kids up every 10 minutes, but I also knew my colleague Sarah, who has a second grader at the local elementary, would have to pay for extra childcare she couldn’t afford.
Still, we launched the pilot. The first month, the changes were impossible to miss. The office said late arrivals dropped 27% in the first four weeks. I stopped getting three or four requests a week to let kids run to the vending machine for caffeine. The 10 minutes of silent reading I do to start class went from eight kids napping to one, max. By the end of the first semester, Javi hadn’t slept through a quiz in three months. He even joined the debate club, which meets before school. When state test scores came out that summer, our 7th grade ELA scores went up 9%, and math went up 7%. Disciplinary referrals for unruly behavior in first period dropped by almost half.
But it wasn’t all good news. Bus routes were messed up for the first two months, some kids waited 20 minutes longer for pick up, and some were dropped off 15 minutes late most days. Sports practice ended at 6:30 p.m. instead of 5:30, so kids got home at 7, ate dinner at 8, and started homework at 8:30. A few parents told me their kids were still going to bed at the same 12:30 a.m. time as before—they just traded morning sleep for extra homework time at night. One of my students, Lila, had to drop her advanced ballet class because it started too late after soccer practice. Sarah, my colleague, ended up paying an extra $150 a week for after-school care for months before a solution popped up. Even Javi, who gained the most from the change, says some nights he still stays up too late scrolling after he finishes homework.
I get asked all the time by parents and teachers from other districts whether it’s worth pushing for a later start. The answer I give is that it’s not a magic fix for low test scores or teen burnout, but it fixes a problem we’ve been asking kids to adapt to for no good reason. Teen circadian rhythms really do shift; it’s biology, not laziness or bad parenting. It shouldn’t be up to parents to fix a schedule that’s out of line with how kids’ brains work.
If you’re thinking of advocating for a change at your school, the concrete step I tell people is to bring your own specific stories to school board meetings, not just research. Studies on sleep and test scores help, but nothing moves people like a parent saying my 13-year-old can’t stay awake for first period because they have to get up at 6 a.m. If your district does approve a later start, push for low-cost fixes for the growing pains: ask the school to open the library or gym an hour early for kids whose parents have to leave for work early. Most schools already have staff on site that early, so it rarely costs much extra. If your district refuses to change the start time, small adjustments help: charge your kid’s phone in the kitchen instead of their bedroom overnight, and don’t let them check it for the first 15 minutes after they wake up to cut down on mindless scrolling that makes them more tired. If your kid is always groggy first period, email their teacher and ask if they can take first-period tests after lunch instead. Most teachers are happy to adjust if you ask.
Last semester, the district voted to make the later start permanent. The parent group that opposed it is still collecting signatures to shift back, and they have a real point: for working families without extra money for childcare, it’s a big burden. We’re still working out the kinks—the local rec center just launched a low-cost early drop-off program this year, which has helped a lot. Last week, I stood by my door at 8:25 a.m., holding my coffee, and Javi walked in, fresh from a debate tournament the night before, and started telling me about his argument supporting later school starts. He didn’t yawn once. It’s not a perfect solution, and there are still trade-offs no one has figured out how to fix entirely. But it’s a lot better than asking a room full of kids to learn when their brains are still half asleep.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Should Schools Start Later