My Teacher Crushed My Dream in 1994 — Now I Watch Every Word I Say to My Daughter
The story was about a dog that chased a car, caught it, and then had no idea what to do next. I was nine years old, sitting at a desk with a Trapper Keeper and a pencil case full of Lisa Frank stickers. I had written four pages, which felt enormous. Mrs. Calder handed it back with red ink scattered through the margins like bird footprints.
“You have a good imagination,” she said, not unkindly. “But you’re not really a writer. You should think about focusing on science.”
I remember nodding. I remember putting the story into my backpack and not taking it out again that year. I remember asking my mom to switch me into the science elective the next semester. I don’t remember writing another story until I was thirty-two.
It wasn’t a dramatic cruelty. No one yelled at me. My parents never told me I couldn’t be creative. But in that one sentence, a teacher I respected gave me a label I didn’t know how to argue with: you’re not a writer. And at nine, I believed her.
That moment has lived in my head for three decades. Not as a wound anymore, but as a cautionary tale I carry into my own parenting. Because I have a daughter now, and she makes things all the time. She draws, she writes, she sculpts small animals out of clay that always look like blobs with ears. And I am hyperaware that one careless adult sentence can change the course of a child’s self-image.
When we talk to kids about their interests, we tend to make declarations. “You’re so smart.” “You’re a natural artist.” “You’re great at math.” They sound positive. But they carry a hidden weight. If a child believes their identity is fixed — that being a writer means you were born with the gift — then the first rejection or bad grade becomes evidence that they are not, in fact, a writer. They don’t just fail at a task. They fail at being a person.
I saw this play out in classrooms for years. A student would show me a story or a drawing, and I would see the adult in their life hovering with big expectations. If I said, “This is amazing,” the student would beam, but I knew they were collecting my words as proof of their permanent talent. The next story might be weaker, and they would crumble. I learned to say something different: “Tell me about this part.” Or “What did you decide to do here?” That invited them to see their work as a series of choices, not a verdict.
It seems like a small difference. But it changes the question from “Am I good?” to “What am I trying to do?” And that is a far more sustainable way to make anything.
I didn’t have anyone ask me that in 1994. If Mrs. Calder had said, “I like how you showed the dog feeling confused,” or “What would you change about the ending?” I might have kept going. Instead, I learned to avoid writing. I became a decent science student, then a biology major, then a teacher. I liked science. But I never stopped editing my own thoughts in my head — the way you do when you’re a kid who has been quietly told that your inner world is not worth pursuing.
When my daughter turned seven, she announced she wanted to be an illustrator. She showed me a picture of a wizard who looked suspiciously like our cat. My first instinct was to say, “That’s wonderful! You’re such a great artist!” I caught myself. Because that’s exactly the kind of label that could later hurt her. If she met a child who drew better, or if a teacher critiqued her work, she might decide she wasn’t an artist after all.
Instead, I said, “I love the colors you chose. What made you decide to make his hat purple?”
She looked at me like I was slightly slow. “Because purple is the best color, obviously.”
I laughed. She kept drawing.
I am not saying that we should never praise children. That would be absurd. But there is a difference between praising effort and strategies versus attaching identity. Telling a child “you are talented” is a shortcut. It makes us feel supportive. It also gives the child nowhere to go when things become difficult. Effort-based comments — “You worked hard on that,” “You learned a new way to do that” — tie their self-worth to actions they can control. That matters more the older they get, because eventually every child will encounter someone better, and every child will fail.
The hard truth is that not all dreams come true. I know this as an adult. Not every child who wants to be a professional athlete will be one. Not every child who loves music will play at Carnegie Hall. But that’s not a reason to redirect them early. The point of childhood isn’t to produce successful adults as efficiently as possible. The point is to let kids explore what they care about, so they build the habit of pursuing something — anything — with seriousness.
In 1994, no one asked me what I wanted to write about. No one asked me to read the story aloud. No one asked me if I had written it for myself or for the grade. It was just graded, labeled, and filed. And I learned that the goal was not to express myself, but to perform to someone else’s standard. That performance mindset is hard to shake.
These days, my daughter leaves her drawings all over the house. They cover the kitchen table, her bedroom floor, the back seat of the car. I used to pick them up and throw them away when she wasn’t looking. Now I collect them in a big plastic bin under my bed. It’s not organized. Some are crumpled. Some are half-finished. But when she asks me what I’m doing with them, I tell her they’re pieces of how she sees the world. She shrugs and goes back to drawing.
I don’t know if she’ll still want to be an illustrator next year. She might switch to something else — at the moment she is also very interested in volcanoes and gorillas. And maybe she will eventually decide that making art is just a hobby, or she’ll stop altogether. That’s okay. What matters to me is that if she does stop, it won’t be because someone told her she wasn’t good enough. It will be because she found something else that mattered more.
I still have not written the rest of that dog-and-car story. I sometimes think about it, though. The dog catches the car, and then what? It is a strange image of ambition: chasing something loud and fast, finally getting close, having no plan for what comes next. Maybe Mrs. Calder was right that I had a good imagination. But she never asked what happened after the dog got what it wanted. She just decided the story wasn’t worth reading.
I don’t want to be that kind of adult. I want to ask more questions. I want to notice the choices a child makes, not just the label I can assign to them. It doesn’t fix everything. I still second-guess myself. But when my daughter hands me a picture and says, “Look, it’s us,” I try to slow down. I look. I say, “I see you put me in a hat.” And she grins because I noticed the details.
That seems small. But it is exactly the thing that was missing for me in 1994. Someone just needed to look at my story and ask me what I was trying to do. No one did. I can’t change that now. But I can keep looking at her work like it matters, because it does — and because the next adult she meets might not.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » My Teacher Crushed My Dream in 1994 — Now I Watch Every Word I Say to My Daughter