Is AI Dependency Changing How Kids Approach Hard School Subjects? A Teacher’s Real Take
Last Wednesday at 3:35, I was stacking exit tickets on my chipped ceramic desk, waiting for the last of my 8th grade algebra students to head out for the late bus, when Mia lingered by my door, twisting the drawstring of her gray hoodie. She pushed a crumpled quadratics worksheet across my desk, half the attempts crossed out so heavy the paper tore at the edges, her chipped blue nail polish bitten down to the cuticles from stress. “I just can’t do this,” she said. “What’s the point anyway?” She tapped her phone twice, and a full worked answer popped up on the screen, perfect steps and all, before I could even lean in to look.
I’ve had Mia since 6th grade. Two years ago, she sat in that same spot for 22 minutes (I checked the clock because I was late for a staff meeting) working through a tricky linear equation, erasing so much her pink eraser wore down to a nub. She didn’t ask anyone for the answer, didn’t reach for a phone, just sat with that frustrated hunch until she worked through the wrong step and got it right. Today, she didn’t even make it five minutes before pulling up AI. That contrast got me thinking about all the panic around AI dependency: are we actually seeing a big shift in how kids approach hard subjects, or are we just blowing a new tool out of proportion?
Before I could say anything to Mia, Javi knocked to grab the water bottle he’d left under his desk. He saw what we were looking at and shrugged. “I use ChatGPT for these too, but I just make it tell me the first step, not the whole thing. All the extra words in word problems mess me up.” Javi has dyslexia, and before AI, he’d skip half the word problems on homework because he couldn’t parse the language to even get started. He got a C- on his last quiz, his best grade in algebra all year. AI didn’t make him dependent—it let him get past the barrier that kept him from even trying the hard part.
That night, I drove home, stopped for fast food because I didn’t feel like cooking, and found my 10th grade son at the kitchen table doing chemistry homework. I leaned over to grab a fry, and he had AI open too. He’d just finished balancing three equations on his own, then plugged each one in to check his work, crossing out the one he messed up and redoing it. “It’s faster than waiting for the answer key tomorrow,” he said, “and I don’t have to bug you when you’re folding laundry.”
Before AI, we had Slader, we had kids copying homework in homeroom, we had CliffsNotes for every novel ever written. Shortcuts have always existed. But there is a real shift, it’s just not the one most panic pieces talk about. What’s changed is that kids don’t get much practice sitting with the uncomfortable feeling of being stuck anymore. Back when I was a kid, if you got stuck on a problem, you had to wait to ask a friend after class, or walk to the library to look up the answer. That 10 or 20 minute gap between being stuck and getting help was time you spent turning the problem over in your head, even if you didn’t realize you were practicing. Now, the answer is two taps away. That gap is gone. The muscle of sticking with something hard doesn’t get used as much, for kids who default to AI right away.
It’s not that kids are lazier than they used to be—it’s that the easiest default is now to outsource the hard part before you even try it. And that’s a change we can adjust to, without banning phones or panicking about the end of education. I’ve tried three small things that work, both in my classroom and at home with my son, that don’t take extra time or fancy resources.
First, we use the 10 minute pre-AI rule. Before anyone pulls out their phone to use AI, they have to write down three things they know about the problem, and one specific thing they’re stuck on. That’s it. No pressure to solve the whole thing, just write those four lines down. It forces you to engage with the problem first, instead of reaching for help out of habit the second it feels hard. I started this a few months ago, and half the time kids realize they know more than they thought once they write it down, and don’t even need AI.
Second, if you do use AI, you have to pass the teach-it-back test. If my student or my son uses AI to get a step or answer, they have to explain it to me like I’ve never taken the class before. If they can’t point to why each step works, they have to go back and work through it again. Last week, Mia got halfway through explaining her quadratic answer and realized she’d mixed up the formula, fixed it on her own, and didn’t need anything else from AI.
Third, we shift where AI lives to break the habit of reaching for it automatically. In my class, phones go in pouches on the wall, so if you need to use AI, you have to get up, get your phone, and bring it back to your desk. At home, my son keeps his phone on the counter across the room from his homework table, so he has to get up to get it if he needs it. That extra 10 seconds of walking is enough to make most kids think, “Wait, can I try one more thing first?”
Mia got a B on her last quadratic quiz, the best grade she’s earned all semester. She told me she didn’t use AI on half the problems, because once she wrote down her three known points, she realized she could work through it. I still see kids copy entire homework sets from AI every week, and I still get emails from parents panicking that their kid can’t do anything without ChatGPT. I don’t think we’re overstating the shift, but I also don’t think it’s the crisis most people make it out to be. It’s just a new tool that changed the default response to difficulty. We’re all still figuring it out day by day, and so far, small habit shifts work a lot better than panic or bans.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Is AI Dependency Changing How Kids Approach Hard School Subjects