In Mrs. Costa’s fourth-grade classroom in Milan, there are twenty-two children at the start of the year. By November, that number has climbed to twenty-six—and four of the newcomers arrived with almost no Italian. She doesn’t have an assistant. The reading program she spent the summer preparing assumes kids can follow basic instructions in the same language. She adjusts, pulling picture cards off a shelf she usually reserves for first graders, but she worries about the eleven Italian kids who now wait longer for her attention.
Italy is now planning to cap the number of non-Italian students per class—at around 20 percent, with exceptions for children born in Italy or those already proficient in Italian. The stated goal is integration, not exclusion, but the word makes many teachers pause. Because what we call integration in schools is rarely a simple numbers game. Some classrooms with one or two foreign students integrate beautifully. Some with a balanced mix become fractured social groups. And some with a higher percentage somehow feel more united than anyone predicted.
I think about a boy named Amir, who arrived in the same class two years ago, in September. He spoke Farsi and had spent four years in a refugee camp in Greece before coming to northern Italy. On his first day, he sat near a window and repeated a few words the teacher said, not to communicate but to feel their shape. The Italian kids mostly left him alone. It wasn’t hostile, just uncertain—they didn’t know what to say to someone who didn’t understand their jokes or their playground songs.
After two weeks, Mrs. Costa paired him with a girl named Giulia during art projects. Giulia had a calm, deliberate way of speaking, and she didn’t over-explain. She showed him how to fold paper once, then handed him the sheet. By Christmas, Amir had about three hundred Italian words, and Giulia had started saying things like “we could,” leaving space for his answer. Nobody measured integration that day, but something was working.
The proposed cap would have kept that class more homogeneous. Amir would have made it under the exceptions anyway because he was already in the country, but the principle remains. What worries teachers like Mrs. Costa is not the number itself—most agree that some limit is reasonable for language support—but the assumption that integration can be achieved through attendance ratios alone. Integration, in daily classroom life, is a messy, slow, relational process. It happens over lunch tables and broken crayons, during group work and playground negotiations.
A colleague of hers in Turin runs a fifth-grade class with a 35 percent foreign-born student population. She told me that her class feels more integrated than many of the school’s other classes with lower percentages. The difference, she believes, is that the teachers in her grade stopped separating children by language ability. Instead, they started structuring everything—math, history, science—around paired tasks where one child who speaks strong Italian works with one who is still learning. They rotate pairs every week. The goal isn’t just language. It’s creating a classroom where every child has to rely on someone else, regardless of where they were born.
That is concrete work. It doesn’t happen automatically because a class contains a certain ratio of nationalities. It requires teachers to plan for interaction the same way they plan for grammar lessons. For parents at home, the equivalent is simpler but just as specific: inviting classmates over without worrying about language gaps, encouraging kids to call each other after school even when conversations are clumsy, and letting children figure out their own communication systems. One mother I know organizes a monthly group at a public park, and she sends notes in three languages. She doesn’t translate fully for everyone—she includes enough words to get by. Kids learn to piece meaning together. That’s more like how real integration works.
But numbers matter too, in a different way. When too many newcomers arrive at once, without pre-existing structures, teachers spend disproportionate time on basic survival routines. A cap might protect certain schools from becoming overwhelmed. In some neighborhoods, especially in cities like Milan and Rome where rented housing is concentrated, one school can absorb 40 percent immigrant students while another school ten minutes away remains almost entirely Italian. That imbalance doesn’t help anyone. In that sense, the policy is a response to real pressure. There is such a thing as a school environment where language acquisition slows because no one feels the urgency to practice Italian outside the classroom.
Still, Mrs. Costa says the most effective integration she has seen did not come from policy. It came from a teacher noticing that Amir loved soccer. During recess, she handed him a ball and deliberately assigned him to the same team as Marco, the loudest and most generous player in the class. Marco didn’t speak Farsi, but soccer has universal rules. Within a month, Marco started calling Amir “bro” and defending him when kids from other classes said something unkind. Language came later—messy and incomplete, but attached to a feeling of belonging.
That is integration, and it is hard to legislate. The cap might reduce anxiety among some parents and give schools a clearer framework. But if it becomes the end of the conversation, if classrooms adjust their numbers and then consider the job done, it will fail. Integration requires ongoing, daily choices. A teacher who pairs a recently arrived child with a patient classmate. A parent who spends a bit of extra time on translations so that a birthday invitation can include the new kid’s family. A school that decides not to redirect all newcomers into one remedial class, but instead builds small support lessons that still let them spend most of the day with everyone else.
In the end, no single rule will make a classroom magical. The sense of belonging comes from small interactions, repeated until they become ordinary. Amir now speaks Italian well enough to tell jokes, though his timing is still slightly off. Giulia has become more patient than many adults I know. Mrs. Costa’s class is currently at 28 percent foreign students, above the proposed cap. Some parents have asked if that is a problem. She doesn’t have a neat answer. She says she watches one thing: when a new child arrives, whether anyone shows him how to play. So far, they always do.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » In Mrs