I’m Building a Game Where Kids Explore and Learn—and I’m Looking for Teachers to Test It
Last Tuesday, I sat in the back of a fourth-grade classroom with a laptop open, watching ten students try out a prototype of a game I’ve been building for the past six months. The game is simple on the surface: kids steer a small cart through a fictional island, collecting seeds, observing wildlife, and talking to villagers who have problems that require a bit of investigation. There are no timed quizzes, no points for correct answers, and no “game over” screens. Instead, the cart breaks down if you ignore the materials in your inventory. A character might mention that the bridge upstream washed away, and it’s up to the player to figure out that the vines they collected earlier can be woven into a rope.
One girl, Maya, spent ten minutes trying to cross that bridge with a broken cart. She clicked on the bridge, clicked on her cart, clicked on the riverbank. The boy next to her suggested she try the vines. Maya ignored him. She kept clicking the same three spots, getting the same “That won’t work” message each time. Finally, she opened her inventory, dragged the vines onto the bridge, and the cart rolled across. She didn’t smile or cheer. She just said, “Oh. That was it,” and moved on. But she remembered. Twenty minutes later, when another character mentioned needing a tool to dig through a rocky path, Maya went straight to her inventory before anyone else had even opened theirs.
That moment confirmed something I’ve suspected for a while. Kids learn best when they’re allowed to fumble, not because they’re being tested, but because they’re trying to get somewhere they want to go. Maya wasn’t solving a problem because I told her to. She was solving it because the game had created a small, believable obstacle that her curiosity refused to leave alone.
I’m a former teacher, and I’ve spent the last two years working on this game in my spare time. The premise isn’t new—exploration-based learning has a long history, from Oregon Trail to Minecraft. But most educational games I’ve seen in classrooms are still built around rewards and penalties. Answer three questions, get a brain break. Finish a level, unlock a hat. The message underneath is always the same: learning is the price you pay for the fun part. I wanted to build something where the exploring is the fun part, and the learning is just what you happen to do while you’re trying to figure out where to go next.
The tricky part is that I’m not in the classroom anymore. I have a good sense of what motivates my own kids at home, but I don’t have a steady stream of real students telling me where a game feels confusing, where it’s too slow, or where it accidentally teaches the wrong thing. That’s why I’m reaching out to teachers who might be willing to test the game with their students and give honest feedback.
Here’s what I’m looking for: teachers who can run the game on whatever devices are available—Chromebooks, old laptops, even a single classroom computer with a projector. The game runs in a browser, so there’s no installation. It’s designed for kids ages eight to twelve, but I’m open to older or younger students if the teacher thinks it fits. I don’t need formal lesson plans or written assessments. I just need someone to watch what kids do, listen to what they say, and tell me where they get stuck in the wrong way—stuck because of a confusing interface or a poorly worded clue, not because they’re thinking.
That distinction matters. During that same classroom session, one boy raised his hand and said, “The inventory button is hidden behind the map.” I had placed the interface icons in what I thought was an intuitive spot, but he’d spent three minutes searching for his items. That’s a design flaw, not a learning opportunity. Another child asked why there wasn’t a way to see her “level.” She was so conditioned by other games that she assumed there was something she was missing. I didn’t want a level system, but her question made me realize that without some kind of visible progress marker—a sandbox that gradually reveals new areas, for example—kids might feel aimless rather than free.
These are exactly the things only real classrooms reveal. A beta tester playing at a desk at home with a snack and no distractions is not the same as a kid in a noisy room, sharing a Chromebook with a partner, or trying to play during the last twenty minutes of a Friday afternoon.
So here’s what I’m asking teachers to do, if this sounds interesting: play the game yourself first, even for fifteen minutes. Then put it in front of your students with very little instruction. Don’t explain the goal too much. Let them discover it. That’s the whole point. Then, if you have time, jot down three or four things that stand out. Did any kids give up quickly? Did anyone discover something you expected me to tell them? Did the pacing match the attention span of your particular group? That kind of grounded observation is worth more than any analytics dashboard I could build.
I’ve already had a few teachers try it with their classes. One second-grade teacher told me her students spent a full afternoon drawing their own islands after playing for only thirty minutes. She said the game didn’t feel like “content delivery”—it felt like a place. That comment stayed with me because that’s the feeling I’m chasing. I don’t want kids to learn facts about ecosystems or engineering through a lecture disguised as an adventure. I want them to develop the habits of noticing things, making connections, and trying out weird ideas that don’t work.
Still, I’m aware of the gaps. I don’t know how the game plays on a tablet with a spotty Wi-Fi connection. I don’t know how it handles a kid who has reading difficulties and gets frustrated by text-heavy dialogue. I’m planning to add audio narration for all dialogue, but that’s the kind of thing I need to hear from a real teacher before I spend another month recording. And I don’t know if the island has enough moments of genuine surprise to keep a class engaged for more than a few sessions.
That last point keeps me up at night. A game like this lives or dies on its ability to feel alive. If a teacher opens it on a Monday and the kids are bored by Wednesday, it doesn’t matter how accurate the ecology or how clever the puzzles. It becomes another thing they have to do at school.
That’s why testing matters so much. I need teachers who are willing to say, “My kids liked the part with the boar, but they completely ignored the cave,” or “The audio was too quiet, and nobody wanted to wear the cheap headphones we have.” I need someone who will tell me the honest version of what happened, not a polite version. I can handle that. I’ve been on the other side of the classroom long enough to know that the most useful feedback often comes from moments that feel like small failures.
Right now, the game is in an awkward middle stage. The first island is fully playable, but there are rough edges—some dialogue doesn’t match the illustrations, and a few mechanics are still getting tuned. I’m looking for about twenty teachers to run it with their students over the next couple of months, ideally for thirty minutes a day over a week or two. You don’t need any special technical skills. If you can open a web browser and create a free account, that’s enough.
If this sounds like something your class might try, you can get in touch through the contact form on my website. I’ll send you a teacher password and a short guide—more like suggestions than instructions. I’ll also ask for your feedback in your own words, however you want to give it. A voice memo, a messy Google Doc, an email written during prep period. I read all of it.
I wish I could say I have a clear picture of what this game will become once it’s finished. I don’t. It might turn out to be the kind of thing kids play for a few weeks and remember years later. Or it might need a lot of changes before it feels right. That’s the part I’m still figuring out, and I’m hoping teachers will help me see it more clearly. For now, I just want to keep putting it in front of real students, watching where they pause, and learning from the moments when they find their own way across the bridge.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » I’m Building a Game Where Kids Explore and Learn—and I’m Looking for Teachers to Test It