How to Teach Kids to Solve Ethical Problems, Not Just Memorize Rules
The knock on my classroom door after lunch was soft, but Mia’s shoulders were hunched tight enough to tell me it mattered. She stepped inside, glanced over her shoulder at Javi waiting by the water fountain, and whispered, “He took a lollipop from the fundraiser jar. Without paying.”
Five years ago, I would have handled this a very specific way. I’d have called Javi in, reminded him stealing is wrong, made him pull a dollar from his pocket to pay, and had him apologize to the class for breaking our rules. That’s how I was taught to teach ethics: a list of clear do’s and don’ts, memorize the basics, punish anyone who breaks the rules. But a week before this interaction, a parent pulled me aside after school to talk about her son. He’d gotten into a fight at the park, punching a kid who was picking on a younger child. He knew picking on people is wrong, he told his mom, but he didn’t know what else to do. That stuck with me. We spend so much time teaching kids basic ethical rules, we never teach them how to actually work through the messy problems that don’t fit in a neat rule box.
So that day, I didn’t pull out the rule book. I asked Mia if she’d mind sitting with me while I talked to Javi, and I told both of them I wasn’t going to fix this for them. We’d figure it out together. Javi’s cheeks went pink right away, and he pulled the crinkled sparkly lollipop out of his pocket before I even asked. It was his little sister’s seventh birthday, he said. Their mom got laid off from the grocery store two months prior, and all she’d asked for was this exact lollipop from our fundraiser. He was going to pay back the dollar next week, when his mom finished her first cleaning side job. He just didn’t have it right now.
Mia’s shoulders softened when he said that, but she still crossed her arms. “All the money goes to the food bank,” she said. “We were supposed to get 20 bags of groceries. If people just take stuff, we can’t do that.” She was right. Javi knew she was right. Neither of them knew what to do next, so I just said, “Okay. We know what the problem is. What are some ideas to fix it that works for everyone?”
At first they just stared at me. They were used to me telling them the answer. After a minute, Mia said, “I have an extra dollar in my backpack from my allowance. I can pay for it.” Javi shook his head. “That’s your money. I don’t want your money.” Then he paused. “I could help you set up the art table every day this week. That’s the job you pay a dollar a week for, right? That can pay for the lollipop.” I nodded, didn’t say anything else. Then Mia said, “Wait. What if someone else needs something and can’t pay right now? Can we put a sticky note on the jar that says they can write their name down and pay later? Then no one has to take it without telling anyone.”
That solution was better than anything I would have come up with. I would have sent Javi back with a lecture, left the jar the same, and missed the chance for both of them to actually work through something hard. By the end of the month, we had three extra dollars in the jar from kids who saw the note and donated extra “for when someone needs it.”
This isn’t just a classroom thing, either. I talk about this with other parents all the time, and most of us do the same thing at home. We tell our kids don’t lie, don’t be mean, don’t take what’s not yours. But when they’re at a sleepover and their best friend is gossiping about another kid from class, what do they do? They know gossiping is wrong, but they don’t want to get left out of the group. When their friend cheats on a test, they know cheating is wrong, but they don’t want to ruin their friend’s spot on the soccer team. Rules don’t tell them what to do when two right things conflict, or when the problem isn’t black and white.
The best part is, this doesn’t take extra time or fancy lesson plans. There are three small things I do now that anyone can try. When a kid comes to you with a sticky problem, first don’t jump in with your answer. Ask them, “What do you think will happen if you do that? What’s good about that option, what’s hard?” That’s it, that’s the question. No big speech. Second, bring small, ordinary ethical problems up in casual conversation. Over dinner, you can say, “I accidentally ate the last yogurt that my roommate said she was saving for her breakfast. What do you think I should do?” It’s low stakes, and it gets them used to thinking through problems instead of just repeating rules. Third, if their first idea isn’t perfect, don’t shut it down. If they say “I’d tell the whole class that Javi stole,” just ask how that would make Javi feel, and how it would help fix the problem. Let them adjust their own idea instead of you giving them the correct one.
Last week, we had a fight at recess over four square. A kid who’d gotten a time out for pushing wanted to join the game, and half the team said no, half said yes. They argued for almost five minutes before one of them said, “Wait, let’s list the options like we do in class.” They ended up letting him join for half the rotation if he sat out the first two games to calm down. It wasn’t perfect, and someone still pouted the whole time. But they didn’t run to me to fix it. They figured it out on their own.
I still mess this up. Some days when I’m rushing to finish math before dismissal, I just tell them what to do instead of letting them work through it. It’s slower, it’s messier, it doesn’t fit into my lesson plan half the time. But memorizing rules won’t help them when they’re adults and have to figure out how to handle a messy problem at work, or with a friend, or in their family. This way, they’re already practicing. It’s not a perfect system, but it’s better than sending them out into the world with nothing but a list of rules and no idea how to use them.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » How to Teach Kids to Solve Ethical Problems, Not Just Memorize Rules