How the quietest kid got chosen as class president (and what I learned about student elections)
The campaign speeches were supposed to be two minutes each. We had five candidates, and four of them had posters, handouts, and in one case, a small bag of lollipops that the school nurse later asked me about. The fifth candidate, Marcus, had nothing. He stood at the front of the room with his hands in his pockets, looked at the floor, and said, “I don’t really like talking in front of people. But I’ll listen if you need someone to listen.”
The class went quiet. I thought it was the kind of quiet that felt sorry for him. Then a girl in the second row, Riley, raised her hand and said, “He always helps me with my math when the teacher is busy.” Another kid said, “He shares his markers.” That was it. The speeches moved on.
Election day was the following Friday. We had a ballot box made out of a shoebox and slips of paper. I counted the votes after lunch. Out of twenty-eight students, Marcus got seventeen. He won by a lot.
I wasn’t surprised, exactly. But I wanted to understand what had happened, because it didn’t look like a typical elementary school election. Usually, the kids who win are the ones who are already popular—the ones who are good at sports, or funny, or have the best Halloween costumes. Marcus was none of those things. He was the kid who ate lunch in the library once a week with the literacy aide. He wore the same gray hoodie most days. He didn’t have a best friend so much as he had a few kids he’d sit next to.
So why him?
I started paying closer attention after the election. Marcus didn’t make announcements. He didn’t call meetings. For the first week, he mostly just stood near me during transitions and asked things like, “When do we need to line up?” or “Do you want me to collect the worksheets?” He wasn’t doing anything that looked like leadership. But the class started doing things differently. Kids would wait for him before going out to recess. When a group was arguing over which game to play, Marcus would say, “Okay, let’s do the one everyone can agree on,” and somehow they’d listen.
I realized the election didn’t change Marcus. It revealed what the class already knew. They weren’t picking the person who promised to make class more fun. They were picking the person they trusted not to make it worse.
That’s a distinction we don’t talk about enough when we do elections in school. We treat them like miniature versions of adult politics. Candidates make promises, hand out trinkets, and learn to project confidence. But for kids, especially in upper elementary, the election is less about policy and more about social safety. They want someone who won’t embarrass them, won’t play favorites, and won’t turn the job into a power trip. Marcus fit that. He didn’t tell anyone he’d do anything. He just didn’t seem like he wanted power, which was exactly why they handed it to him.
The practical lesson for teachers is not to script the whole thing. I didn’t do much except set the rules and count the votes. But one thing I did was make the speech part optional. We had a few kids who wanted to run but didn’t want to speak. I let them have a buddy present a one-sentence statement, or they could just type something. I also didn’t allow the word “vote for me” in any of the speeches. It was a small rule, but it forced them to actually say why they wanted the role. Marcus didn’t even do that well, but he said something honest, and honesty stood out because it was the only speech that didn’t sound rehearsed.
There’s a lot of pressure on parents to raise confident kids. We worry that if a child is quiet, they’ll get overlooked. But Marcus wasn’t overlooked. He was seen, just not for the reasons we usually celebrate. His parents told me later that he never wanted to run. They had pushed him to do it because the school newsletter said participation was encouraged. He came home after winning and said, “Now I have to talk to people all the time,” and his mom wasn’t sure if that was good or bad.
We let him figure it out. The main job ended up being carrying the attendance folder to the office and announcing the weekly trivia question on the morning announcements. He practiced his line in front of me three times before he said it out loud. “What’s the fastest land animal?” His voice cracked on “animal.” The class laughed, not at him, but with him. He started laughing too.
As the year went on, Marcus didn’t suddenly become outgoing. He still preferred the library once a week. But he got better at asking for what he needed. He told me, “I can’t run the game by myself. Can I have someone help?” So he picked Riley. She was the one who had spoken up for him in the first place. They co-lead. That was a moment I made a note of. Leadership doesn’t have to look like one person steering. Sometimes it means knowing who to stand next to.
If there’s a takeaway for parents or teachers, it’s this: the kids who get chosen aren’t always the ones you expect, and that’s usually a good sign. The election worked because we didn’t over-structure it. We gave kids a chance to choose, and they used it to show what they value. Marcus didn’t earn their votes with a great speech. He earned them by being consistent and unpretending. The election was just the first day they got to say that out loud.
We held another election in the spring. Marcus was up for re-election. He said, “I think I should let someone else do it.” I told him that was his call. He talked to Riley, and they decided Riley would run. She won. Marcus was relieved. He went back to being the quiet kid in the gray hoodie, but every now and then, when someone needed help with math or a marker, they still came to him. The title was just a title. The trust was the real thing.
It’s still there. And I’m still learning what to do with all of it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » How the quietest kid got chosen as class president (and what I learned about student elections)