Expeditionary Learning vs Traditional Public School: What I Learned Switching My 5th Grader
Last October, I stood at our kitchen island folding sweatpants while my 10-year-old son Jax upended his backpack onto the floor. A crumpled 22-question worksheet on forest ecosystems slid out, covered in half-hearted scribbles. “We watched a 12-minute video about this,” he said, kicking the paper across the tile. “There’s a whole forest 10 minutes from here. Why can’t we just go look?”
That question had been bouncing around my head for a year by that point. Jax had spent kindergarten through fourth grade at our zoned traditional public school, and we never had major red flags. He’s always been the kid who gets up to sharpen his pencil three times during reading group, who’d rather dig in the backyard than finish a writing prompt, but he got decent grades and had friends. The problem was, by fourth grade, he came home drained every single day, saying school was “just filling in bubbles and waiting for recess.” A neighbor whose kid thrived at the local expeditionary learning public charter suggested we check it out, and that’s how we ended up deep in the question many parents in our area face: pick the familiar traditional public school, or try the expeditionary learning model down the road?
We went to the scheduled open house expecting the same cookie-cutter gym presentation with stale cookies. Instead, the principal handed us worn waterproof boots and said we’d be joining the current 5th grade class on their weekly wetland walk. Jax spent the whole two hours chasing a frog, pestering the teacher with questions about why the water was greener by the parking lot, and on the drive home he wouldn’t stop talking about how the class planned to present their water quality findings to the city council to get more trash cans added to the trail. We put in our application, got accepted, and switched at the start of 5th grade.
The first six weeks were magic. Jax came home chattering about his project instead of complaining about homework. His backpack had more rock samples and pressed plants than worksheets, and he started volunteering to stay after school to work on the group project. But by first quarter parent-teacher conferences, the doubt crept in. His teacher pulled out his math fluency scores and explained he was about three months behind where most students his age score in traditional public schools. I left the conference with a tight chest, already mentally digging through old math drill worksheets from his old school, wondering if I’d messed up. The biggest critique I’d heard of expeditionary learning was that it prioritizes cool projects over core skills, and I was convinced that’s what was happening.
That night, Jax wandered into the kitchen where I was scrolling through tutoring websites, and asked me to help him figure out how much lumber to buy for the raised bird feeder he was building for his class project. I asked him what size the base needed to be, and he said four feet by three feet. I asked how many square feet that added up to, and he paused, thought for 10 seconds, and said 12, right? He kept going, working out how many planks he needed for the sides, adding up the cost at the hardware store, all in his head, no worksheet, no timer. I realized he wasn’t missing the skill—he just wasn’t practicing it the way traditional schools teach it, on a timed worksheet every morning. He was using multiplication to solve a problem he cared about.
That experience taught me the biggest difference between the two models that no open house tells you about. Expeditionary learning doesn’t skip core skills, it tucks them into projects that feel meaningful to kids. But it’s also not a better fit for every kid, by any means. My best friend’s 10-year-old daughter has ADHD, and she thrives on the predictable routine of traditional public school: 20 minutes of math, 20 minutes of reading, same schedule every day. When she tried a taster day at our charter, she had a meltdown halfway through the morning because the project ran long and lunch was 20 minutes late, and she couldn’t handle the unplanned shift. That’s a real tradeoff that’s rarely talked about when people are comparing options.
If you’re stuck trying to decide between the two, there are a few small, concrete things that helped me that I tell other parents now. First, don’t only visit the scheduled open house. Ask to come in on a random Tuesday, when school is running as normal. Watch how teachers support kids who get stuck on open-ended projects, and how they handle transitions when a project runs longer than planned. Second, you don’t have to switch schools to get more hands-on learning if you like your current traditional public school. Pick one small project a month that ties into what your kid is already studying in class. If they’re learning about erosion, spend an hour after school at the local creek checking how the bank has changed over a year, and have them jot down what they notice. If they’re studying local government, go sit in on a 30-minute city council meeting together. It takes less than an hour a month, and it adds the context that makes lessons stick without upending your whole life. Third, ask your kid’s current teacher if they use any small expeditionary-style units—most traditional public school teachers have adopted at least parts of the model these days, so you might already have access to what you’re looking for.
Jax just finished his presentation to the city council last month. They approved three new trash cans for the wetland trail, and he came home with a crumpled photo of him standing next to the mayor, mud still caked on his jeans. He still forgets assignment deadlines some weeks, and he still complains when he has to write 10 spelling sentences. I still worry sometimes that he’ll be caught behind when he starts middle school next year, that the lack of daily drills will hurt him on the standardized tests high schools look at. But right now, he comes home excited to talk about what he worked on that day, instead of collapsing on the couch and saying school was boring. That’s enough for us, for now.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Expeditionary Learning vs Traditional Public School: What I Learned Switching My 5th Grader