Do Grades Actually Measure Learning, Or Just How Well Kids Follow Instructions?
Last month, I sat crammed into a child-sized molded plastic chair outside my 7th grader Jax’s science classroom, waiting for our parent-teacher conference, a crumpled granola bar wrapper sticking out of my jacket pocket. When Ms. Henderson called us in, she pulled up Jax’s gradebook on her laptop and tapped the screen immediately: a B-. “Let me cut to the chase,” she said, leaning forward. “Jax aces every unit test. He can explain convection currents better than I can, honestly. But he’s losing 10 points on nearly every lab report because he forgets to write the daily learning objective at the top, and he never highlights the required vocabulary terms. Half the time he turns it in on loose notebook paper instead of the template I posted on Google Classroom.”
I wasn’t surprised. Jax complains about this exact thing every Sunday night while he drags through homework. “Why do I have to rewrite the question in the answer? I already got the answer right.” “Why do I need to do extra credit if I got an A on the test?” This isn’t just my kid being stubborn, either. I worked as a part-time sub a few years back, between when my kids were little and when I started my part-time job, and I saw the same dynamic play out over and over. One day I was covering 4th grade social studies, and the lesson was to label the continents on a printed worksheet. A quiet girl named Mia turned in a full-page drawing she did on the back of her sketchbook: all the continents labeled correctly, with little drawings of native animals next to each one, extra details she’d added from a book she loved. It was clear she’d studied, she knew every single name and location. But the permanent teacher had given her a D, because the instructions said “complete the worksheet provided” and she didn’t use the worksheet. She’d learned the material, put extra effort into it, and got punished for not following the exact rules.
That’s when I started asking the question that’s been on my mind ever since: how much of what we grade is actually learning, and how much is just how well kids follow instructions? It’s not that teachers don’t care about learning. When you have 120 students to grade every week, it’s way easier to check boxes: did you turn it in on time? Did you follow the formatting rules? Did you complete every single step even if it’s redundant? Those are clear, easy to grade, no arguing about points. Measuring actual learning takes more time. You have to look past the messy formatting, the late turn-in, the kid who draws instead of fills out the worksheet, and figure out what they actually know. Most teachers don’t have time for that, not with all the other administrative requirements they have to hit. It’s a practical tradeoff, not a failure, but it leaves a lot of kids with grades that don’t match what they’ve actually learned.
I don’t have some big solution to overhaul the whole education system. But I’ve found a few small, concrete things that work for our family, that I’ve shared with other parents who’ve found them helpful too. First, the next time your kid brings home a low grade, don’t open with “Why didn’t you just follow the instructions?” Open with “Can you show me what you were supposed to learn here, and explain it to me?” Last month Jax brought home a C on a social studies worksheet because he didn’t answer every question in a full sentence like the instructions said. When I asked him to explain the main causes of the American Revolution, he reeled off three core causes, gave me specific examples, even connected it to a video he’d watched about the Boston Tea Party. He knew the material perfectly. The C was just for skipping a formatting rule.
Another small shift: if you’re going in for a parent-teacher conference, skip the vague opening “How is my kid doing?” Ask this instead: “Can you separate out my kid’s mastery of the material from their participation and compliance points? What do they actually know, and what do they need to work on?” Most teachers will be relieved to answer that—they know grades are often skewed by compliance stuff, they just don’t always bring it up first. Ms. Henderson told me straight up that she’d rather have Jax in her class, curious and excited about science, than 10 kids who follow every rule but can’t explain basic concepts a week after the test.
For teachers reading this, one small change I’ve heard works well is to cap compliance points at 10% of the total grade. If a kid turns in a lab report that’s perfectly correct but formatted wrong, take off 1 point instead of 10. That way you still encourage following directions, but you don’t punish learning. It’s a small shift that doesn’t add a ton of extra grading time.
We worked out a small deal with Ms. Henderson for Jax: he does one extra hands-on project a quarter to make up for his lost formatting points, instead of doing the required extra credit current events. He brought his grade up to a B+, but that’s not the big win. The big win is that Jax doesn’t come home from school anymore saying “I’m bad at school” because his grade is low. He knows that his ability to figure out how things work matters more than remembering to highlight vocabulary.
I still worry, sometimes. High school is coming, and grades matter for college, and there are way more rules to follow. I don’t know how this will play out in a few years, and I don’t have a perfect fix for a system that still mixes compliance and learning together. But for now, this small shift—asking what he learned before asking what his grade is—feels right. Last weekend he spent three hours in the backyard building a water filter out of sand and activated charcoal, and when it didn’t work he spent another hour tweaking the design. He didn’t get a grade for it. But he learned more about filtration that afternoon than any correctly formatted lab report could ever teach him.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Do Grades Actually Measure Learning, Or Just How Well Kids Follow Instructions