Did Your Degree Shape You? What This Teacher Wants Parents to Understand
I found my college diploma last Sunday in a cardboard box in the garage. The frame was cracked in one corner, and a thin layer of dust had settled over the Latin text. My daughter Maya picked it up, turned it around like a museum artifact, and read the words slowly. Then she asked the question that’s been hanging in my head for years: “Did this actually shape you?”
I opened my mouth to give the expected answer — the one about doors opening and foundations being laid. But standing there with old bike helmets and tangled Christmas lights around us, that felt hollow. So I said something closer to the truth: “The paper didn’t. The experience did.”
Maya squinted at me. “That’s not an answer.”
She’s right. It isn’t. But it’s the honest one.
My degree is in history. I’ve worked in education for eighteen years, and I have never once used my knowledge of 19th-century trade routes in a classroom. Not directly. What I do use — every single day — came from the parts of college that never made it onto a syllabus.
The failure, mostly.
I remember sitting in a research methods class sophomore year and getting a paper back with a C-minus in red ink at the top. I had done the reading. I had shown up. I had written something I thought was fine. The professor, an older woman with reading glasses on a chain, had filled the margins with questions I couldn’t answer: “What is your argument here?” “Why does this evidence matter?” “Who is this for?”
She made me rewrite that paper. Six times. And somewhere around draft four, I realised that was the assignment. Not the essay. The essay was just the container. The real work was learning to be dissatisfied with my own writing without panicking. That skill — staying calm when something isn’t good enough and has to be redone — has carried me through more of my adult life than any historical fact ever did.
My own parents never asked me what I was learning at university. They asked what grade I got. I did the same thing when Maya was younger, before I started paying attention. A’s were met with smiles. B’s were “we’ll try harder.” It took me a while to understand that this made things worse — the grade became the point, and the confusion, the part where actual learning happens, became something to hide.
So when Maya sat on the kitchen floor a few weeks ago, her textbook open to a diagram of cellular respiration and her pencil abandoned mid-sentence, I almost slipped back into the old pattern. She was frustrated, close to tears, and the words came out the way they always do when frustration wins: “I’m just not good at science.”
It would have been easy to reassure her. It would have been easy to say “yes you are!” and watch it bounce off. Instead, I asked what turned out to be the more useful question: “What part exactly isn’t working?”
She stared at the page, then shrugged. “I read the chapter and when I finish, I can’t remember what I read. So the next day in class when the teacher explains it, I don’t know enough to understand what she’s saying.”
That’s not a character flaw. That’s a method problem. So that evening, we tried something small. I told her to read one paragraph at a time, then stop and write a single sentence in her own words in the margin. She looked at me like I had asked her to do origami with her toes, but she tried it. Ten minutes later, she had four sentences scrawled in pencil and the alert, slightly irritated expression of someone who has just discovered that a boring task is actually workable.
The next biology test didn’t come with a triumphant story. She came home, dropped her backpack in the hall, and said, “The cell stuff went okay,” which from Maya is essentially fireworks and a parade.
I didn’t make a big deal of it. I said, “Nice. What was easier this time?” She described the margin notes, then wandered off to find a snack. The win wasn’t the grade. The win was that she didn’t call herself a not-science person. The word “yet” had crept in, unspoken.
This is what I know now that I didn’t know when someone handed me my degree: formal education sorts itself out into content and process. Content has a shelf life. Process is the thing that stays.
My degree gave me practice in being wrong. It gave me deadlines, feedback loops, and the uncomfortable experience of revising something until it looked nothing like my first attempt. It taught me how to look at a complicated mess of information and decide what mattered and what could be set aside. None of that appears on any transcript. All of it shaped me.
I think about a former student of mine from years ago. He was an art major who painted detailed, painstaking oils. He now works as a software developer — a path nobody would have predicted. When I ran into him a while back, he shrugged about it. “Art school taught me how to look at a problem from six different angles before picking one. I just do it in code now.”
That’s what genuine education does. It shapes how you approach the unknown. Not what you know.
Now dinner in our house goes a little differently. Instead of asking Maya how her tests went, I ask a different question: “What was the most confusing thing you learned today?”
The first time, she rolled her eyes. “Why would I want to think about the confusing part?”
But she answered anyway. It was something about a poem the teacher said was ironic, though nobody could explain exactly what that meant. We spent the whole meal debating whether “ironic” actually meant “unlucky with a clever name.” She forgot she was supposed to hate talking about school.
That question has become a quiet fixture since then. It tells her two things: that confusion is expected, and that I’m more interested in how she thinks than whether she’s got it right. The content itself is not mine to learn. But the habit of noticing when she doesn’t understand something — without shame, without anger — that’s a habit she can carry anywhere.
I didn’t feel myself being formed when I sat in a cold college library with a highlighter turning my hands more yellow than the pages. It felt like stress, sleep deprivation, and the vague sense that everyone else knew something I didn’t. There was no moment where I thought, “Ah yes, this is developing important habits.” It just happened slowly, one unglamorous revision at a time.
Maya will probably go to college. Or maybe she won’t. I genuinely don’t know yet, and I’m becoming more comfortable admitting that. The real question was never whether a degree shapes you. A degree is a piece of paper. It’s the act of completing something difficult that does the shaping — and that can happen anywhere. In a university. In a job. Or late on a Sunday afternoon, in a garage with dust on your hands and a cracked frame in front of you.
I put the diploma back in the box. Maya handed it to me carefully, and for a second she looked at the Latin again. “Do you think I’ll get one of these?” she asked.
“Maybe,” I said. “I hope you get the unsaid part, too. The part that isn’t written on the paper.”
She snorted. “You’re so weird, Mom.”
Maybe I am. But I’m mostly okay with that.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Did Your Degree Shape You