Are Kids Actually Taught New Math or Common Core? What Parents Need to Know
Last Tuesday, 7:15 PM, kitchen table. Half a bag of cheddar Goldfish crumbs scattered across the surface, a half-empty mug of cold coffee next to my open laptop, and my 9-year-old Leo shoving his math worksheet across the table at me, scowling. “I don’t get this. You do it.” I leaned in, and there it was: a multi-digit addition problem, with three big boxes drawn under each number, arrows jumping between tens and hundreds places, nothing stacked the way I learned it. I’d seen all the rants on parenting groups—this stupid new math, why can’t they just teach it the way we learned it—and I found myself thinking the same thing for half a second before I remembered I used to teach 4th grade. “Wait, why are we doing it this way anyway?” I said. Leo shrugged. “Ms. Henderson says we have to. Is this new math or Common Core or what?” That was a good question, one I couldn’t answer clearly in the middle of homework chaos, so I texted my best friend Sarah, who still teaches 3rd grade at the local elementary, and asked if we could get coffee that weekend.
We met at the downtown coffee shop with booths that stick to your jeans, she ordered black coffee, I got a vanilla latte, and I pulled Leo’s crumpled worksheet from my purse to lay it between us. She laughed and said that question is the number one thing parents ask her at parent-teacher conferences. Everyone calls it Common Core math, but that’s not actually right. Common Core isn’t a curriculum, and it’s not “new math.” It’s just a list of standards that lay out what skills kids should have by the end of each grade. Back when I was teaching in the early 2000s, before Common Core, we mostly focused on memorizing algorithms—stack the numbers, carry the one, borrow from the next place. That works to get a right answer, but most kids memorized the steps without ever understanding why they worked. Common Core standards just say that kids need to understand the why, along with being able to get the right answer. That’s where all the weird boxes and number lines come from.
She grabbed a napkin and worked through the same 347 + 289 problem from Leo’s sheet to show me. She broke each number apart by place value: 300 + 40 + 7 and 200 + 80 + 9. Add the hundreds first, 300 + 200 = 500. Add the tens, 40 + 80 = 120. Add the ones, 7 + 9 = 16. Add all those results together, 500 + 120 + 16 = 636. Same answer I’d get stacking the numbers the old way, just a different path to get there. She explained that people started lumping all these methods for building number sense together and calling it Common Core, and the name stuck. Some of these methods have been around for decades, way before Common Core was even written. The “new math” people complain about is just the focus on understanding instead of just memorization, which Common Core encouraged, but it’s not the same thing as Common Core itself. And honestly, a lot of the really annoying homework that makes parents crazy is just bad curriculum materials, not the standard itself. Textbook companies had to rush to make new materials when Common Core rolled out, and a lot of them overdid it, adding unnecessary steps to simple problems.
I drove home that afternoon and tried out the small shifts Sarah suggested when Leo sat down for homework that night. First, instead of jumping in to show him my way immediately, I said, “Can you show me what your teacher did in class today?” That’s a concrete phrase that takes 10 seconds to say, and it worked better than I expected. Leo grabbed his pencil, walked me through drawing the boxes, pointing out that the big box was for hundreds and the middle for tens, and I realized he could tell me exactly why we added the hundreds first. When I was his age, I couldn’t have told you why I carried a 1— I just knew that was the rule. Then I tried the second tip: I said, “I learned this a different way, do you want to see how I do it? We can check if we get the same answer.” He was curious, so I showed him stacking the numbers, we got the same result, and he thought that was a fun trick. No confusion, no fighting, just two ways to solve the same problem.
If you’re still confused about a method, Sarah says just send a one-sentence email to your kid’s teacher: “Can you send me a quick example of this method so I can help with homework?” Most teachers have a quick screenshot or link saved, and they’d rather answer that than have parents fighting with their kids every night. It’s low effort, and it clears up 90% of homework tension before it starts.
It’s been a couple of weeks, and we still have rough homework nights. Last night, Leo was working on subtraction, and I still caught myself glancing at his number line drawing and thinking this would be a lot faster if we just did it the old way. But last week, when we were at the store, Leo added up the cost of two Lego sets out loud: $27 plus $42 is $69, he said, before I could even pull out my phone to calculate it. I couldn’t do that in my head when I was 9. I just knew how to do it on paper, following the steps.
It’s not perfect. Some worksheets still feel overly complicated, some days we run late for soccer practice because math homework took twice as long as it should. But I get the confusion now. Kids aren’t just learning “new math” because someone decided to change things for the sake of change. Common Core isn’t the enemy people make it out to be, it just asks that kids actually understand what they’re doing, instead of just memorizing steps. Some days it works, some days we’re still eating cold dinner because we got stuck on math. That’s just how it goes.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Are Kids Actually Taught New Math or Common Core