Why I Started Approving Every Student Post and Comment in Our Class App
The notification popped up on my phone at 9:47 p.m. on a Tuesday. I was loading the dishwasher, which is the only time I seem to check the class app. It was a comment from a student on another student’s post about a science project. The post itself was fine—a photo of a baking soda volcano, slightly blurry, with a caption about how it “kind of worked.” But the comment underneath was the problem. It wasn’t cruel, exactly. It was just thoughtless. A string of laughing emojis and the words “this is so bad lol.” The kid who posted the volcano was in my third-period class. I knew he’d see it before I could do anything. And I knew, with the dull certainty of a teacher who has seen this movie before, that he would probably not post again for a while.
That was the night I turned on post and comment approval for our class platform. It’s a setting buried in the admin controls, and I’d ignored it for two years because it felt like too much work. I didn’t want to be the person who read every single message before it went live. It felt heavy-handed, like reading my students’ notes over their shoulders. But the volcano comment sat with me. I kept thinking about the kid who built it, probably in his kitchen, probably with his mom holding the vinegar. He had taken a risk by posting it. And the reward was a public shrug.
The next morning, I told my class what I was doing. I didn’t make it a big speech. I just said, “Before anything goes up on our class feed, I’m going to see it first. Not to censor you. To make sure the space stays usable.” There was a collective groan, the kind you’d expect. One kid, Marcus, asked if that meant I would delete anything “honest.” I told him no. I told him I would only hold back things that were personal attacks, private information, or just plain mean. “Think of it like a hallway,” I said. “You can say what you want, but you can’t stand in the middle and yell at someone.”
The approval process itself was clunky at first. I’d get a notification, open the app, read the post, and either tap approve or send it back with a quick note. “Can you rephrase this? It sounds a little harsh.” Most kids fixed it without argument. A few didn’t post at all, which I decided was fine. The goal wasn’t to force participation. The goal was to stop the casual, drive-by unkindness that had become the default.
But then a strange thing happened. The posts got better. Not because I was editing them, but because the kids knew I was reading them. They started writing captions with more care. They asked each other questions in the comments instead of just reacting. One girl, Priya, posted a photo of a book she was reading and wrote, “This part confused me, does anyone else get it?” That would have been unthinkable before. The old comment section would have been a graveyard of “cool” and “lol.” Instead, three kids replied with actual thoughts.
That’s when I realized the approval setting wasn’t just a filter. It was a signal. It told them that this space mattered enough for an adult to pay attention. And that attention, weirdly, made them pay more attention to each other.
Around the same time, I introduced a new flair system. The platform let me create tags—little colored labels that appear next to a student’s name. I made four: “Question,” “Helpful Answer,” “Project Share,” and “Just for Fun.” The kids could assign these to their own posts. It sounds small, but it changed the tone again. When a post had the “Question” flair, the comments shifted. People answered instead of joked. When something was tagged “Just for Fun,” it was clear that it wasn’t up for critique. You don’t critique a meme. You just laugh and move on.
The flairs also gave me a quick way to see what was happening. If I saw a cluster of “Question” posts, I knew the class was stuck on something. If “Helpful Answer” was getting used a lot, I knew peer teaching was happening. It was like a low-stakes pulse check.
I won’t pretend it’s perfect. I still get posts that make me sigh. Last week, a kid posted a photo of his lunch with the caption “this is garbage.” I approved it because it wasn’t hurting anyone. But then another kid commented, “your mom packed that?” and I held that one. I sent it back with a note: “This might hurt his feelings. Can you say something else?” He didn’t repost. But he also didn’t complain. I think he got it.
The bigger issue is time. Reading every post and comment takes minutes I don’t always have. Some nights I approve things in a rush, barely skimming. I worry I’ll miss something subtle. And there’s a part of me that wonders if I’m doing them a disservice by not letting them practice self-moderation in real time. The internet won’t have a teacher approving every tweet. At some point, they need to learn to pause on their own.
So I’ve started easing off. This month, I turned off approval for comments, but kept it for original posts. The kids know I’m still watching. And the flairs are still there. It’s a middle ground. It’s not a clean solution. But it’s something. Last Friday, the volcano kid posted again. This time it was a photo of a leaf he found on the way to school. He tagged it “Just for Fun.” No one laughed. One kid commented, “that’s a maple, right?” He replied, “yeah, I think so.” That was it. A tiny, ordinary exchange. But it felt like a small win. Not a victory. Just a sign that the space was still open. And that he was still willing to use it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why I Started Approving Every Student Post and Comment in Our Class App