Why Students Turn In Padded AI Essays: My Simple Daily Bell Ringer Game That Fixes It
Last October, I was grading 10th grade argument essays at my kitchen table, my half-drunk pumpkin spice latte gone cold next to me, my own kid’s muddy soccer cleats propped against the leg of the table. I’d gotten through 18 papers already, and I’d started noticing a pattern: every third paper had a solid core argument, but hundreds of words of empty fluff before the author even got to the point. One essay arguing for later high school start times opened with, “For hundreds of years, formal education has been a cornerstone of human community, and the structure of the school day has long been debated by parents, teachers, and community leaders alike.” By the time the writer got to the part about teen sleep cycles, I’d already forgotten what the thesis was.
I mentioned it at our department meeting the next week, and every other teacher nodded along. The 9th grade teacher said half her narrative essays opened with generic filler about how “family is important to many people all over the world.” The AP Lang teacher said even his top students were turning in 1500 word papers that could be cut to 800 without losing any meaning. Most of it wasn’t intentional cheating, either. My 12-year-old son brought it home to me a few days later: when his class had a 750 word writing assignment, he said most kids just ask a tool to write a 750 word essay, and it adds filler automatically to hit the word count. Kids don’t even realize how much of it is unnecessary. They just know they hit the required word count, so they turn it in.
I’d been looking for new bell ringer ideas anyway — the 5 minute warm-up at the start of class that gets everyone settled before we start the lesson. I was tired of the same old vocabulary questions, so I decided to turn this problem into a game. I called it “Cut the Fluff.”
Here’s how it works: Every morning, I pull a 4-6 sentence padded paragraph, most of them pulled straight from anonymized student submissions I’ve gotten over the semester. I project it on the whiteboard at the front of the room, and give kids two minutes to cross out as many words as they can without changing the core meaning of the paragraph. At the end of two minutes, we go around and share what we cut, talk through any disagreements (sometimes one kid will cut something that another thinks is important, and that leads to a great 1 minute conversation about what’s necessary to make a point clear). The person who cuts the most unnecessary words that day gets a point, and at the end of the week, the person with the most points gets first pick from my lollipop jar.
The first day I tried it, I put up that generic opening paragraph from the start time essay. Javi, a kid in the back row who rarely turned in any extra work, held up his hand within 30 seconds. He’d cut 72 of the 98 opening words, leaving just “Later school start times help teens get enough sleep, which improves grades and mental health.” The whole class oohed. By the end of the week, kids were coming in early, pulling out their pencils before the bell even rang, ready to play.
A month later, the 9th grade teacher asked me to send her my daily paragraphs. Then the middle school ELA teacher down the hall heard about it, and asked to join. Even our AP Biology teacher started using it, because kids were padding the background section of their lab reports with pages of generic information about cell division that they didn’t need. I made a shared folder, and now teachers add their own padded paragraphs from their classes every week. It just grew on its own.
The thing no one talks about much with this problem is that most kids really don’t know what padding looks like. For years, we’ve assigned word counts, so kids learn that longer is better. AI just supercharges that bad habit. It doesn’t add more evidence or more nuance — it just adds words. This game doesn’t require a big unit on concise writing, or hours of extra grading, or fancy detection tools. It just trains kids’ eyes to spot the fluff themselves, in five minutes a day.
It’s also easy to adapt for parents helping kids edit at home. Next time your kid is working on an essay and you notice pages of filler, don’t point it out for them. Turn it into a quick game before dinner: how many words can you two cut together without changing their main point? If your kid only hits the word count with filler, ask them to add one more specific example instead of letting them leave the fluff in. It takes five minutes, and it sticks way better than you crossing out all their extra sentences for them.
For me, the biggest change I’ve seen is in the essays I grade now. Three months in, I’d say about 70% of the papers I get have far less generic padding than they did last fall. Kids still use tools to brainstorm or get a first draft sometimes, but more often now they’ll run their own cut the fluff check before turning it in. They know what to look for.
It’s not a perfect fix. I still get a padded essay every week, and there are still kids who just want to hit the word count and move on. But it turned a really frustrating grading problem into something that’s actually fun, and it teaches a skill that matters beyond high school — whether you’re writing a work email, a college essay, or a cover letter, getting to the point matters more than hitting an arbitrary word count. Right now, it’s working better than any lecture I ever gave on concise writing, and it barely takes any extra work. I don’t know what the next new challenge in the classroom will be, but for this one, this little game is sticking around.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Students Turn In Padded AI Essays: My Simple Daily Bell Ringer Game That Fixes It