Is Crash Course Good for Learning World History, US History, and Political Theory? A Teacher’s Honest Review
It’s 3:15 on a rainy Tuesday last fall, and I’m locking my 10th grade US History classroom door when a small group of kids shuffles over, quiz papers crumpled in their hands. Rain streaks the windows behind them, and all six are slumping, embarrassed, after scoring below 60% on my New Deal assessment. None of them can explain what the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation actually does. My phone buzzes in my pocket: it’s my 11th grader, who’s taking AP Political Science, texting that he still can’t tell social contract theory apart from utilitarianism for his quiz after school. I don’t have time to re-teach an entire 90-minute unit to half a dozen kids, and I can’t leave my son hanging either. That’s when I remembered the thread in my teacher Facebook group where everyone was raving about Crash Course. I told the kids to pull out their phones, pulled up the video on my projector, and sent my son the link to the political theory playlist.
I’d seen short clips of Crash Course before, but I’d never used it regularly with my students or my own kid. What I saw over the next few months surprised me. For my after-school group, the 10-minute New Deal video clicked in a way my lecture hadn’t. John Green talks fast, makes dumb jokes, and frames the whole thing around a simple question: what did the New Deal actually change, for regular people? Ten minutes later, Mia, who rarely speaks up in class, raised her hand and said, “Oh, so it’s just the government saying they’ll make sure your bank money doesn’t disappear if the bank fails. That makes way more sense than the textbook’s three-sentence jargon definition.” When they retook the quiz a week later, four of the six kids improved by 15 points or more. My son got a B+ on his political theory quiz, and he still says the 12-minute clip on Nozick vs. Rawls is the only reason he passed that unit.
But that doesn’t mean it’s perfect, or that it works for every situation. A month into using it regularly, I had a kid turn in a test answer that said the Civil Rights Movement was led entirely by Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks – exactly what the Crash Course US History video focuses on, leaving out almost all the work of Ella Baker, the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and the Black women organizers who did most of the on-the-ground organizing. World History videos speed through centuries of colonial rule, skipping over most Indigenous resistance movements that I center in my curriculum. It’s 10 minutes, after all. You can’t fit everything. Last school year, one of my top students decided he’d only use Crash Course to study for the AP US History exam, because he didn’t have time to read his textbook. He got a 2 on the exam, because the free response questions require specific examples and nuance that Crash Course just doesn’t have room to include.
So is Crash Course great for learning these subjects? It depends entirely on how you use it. I’ve stopped thinking of it as a replacement for textbooks or in-class teaching, and started thinking of it as a tool that fits specific needs – and that’s where it shines.
For parents, if your kid comes home confused about a single topic they learned in history that day, and you can’t remember the difference between the Federal Reserve and the FDIC yourself? Just send them the relevant Crash Course link. It’s a free, quick second explanation that will get them un-stuck without you having to brush up on 100-year-old policy or sort through a dozen random YouTube videos to find something reliable. That’s a game-changer for parents who don’t feel confident helping with high school history homework.
For teachers and homeschool parents: use it as an intro to a new unit, not the main content. I have my kids watch the 10-minute Crash Course video for homework the night before we start a new topic, so they already have the big picture when they walk into class. That frees up 20 minutes of class time that I used to spend lecturing on basic facts, so we can do deep dives into primary sources and talk about the nuance that Crash Course leaves out. If you’re homeschooling and don’t feel comfortable putting together a full history or political theory curriculum from scratch, you can use Crash Course playlists as your basic outline, and just add one 1-page primary source excerpt a week to fill in the gaps the videos leave. For example, after watching the Civil Rights Movement video, pull up a 1-paragraph excerpt from Ella Baker’s speech on grassroots organizing to add the missing context. That’s low effort, and it fixes most of the oversimplification problem.
If your kid is cramming for a midterm or final, the full playlists work great as a quick review to jog their memory of all the key topics they covered over the semester. They can watch one 10-minute video a night for a week before the exam, and it’s way less overwhelming than trying to re-read an entire 500-page textbook.
Last week, a new student transferred into my world history class, two weeks into our unit on the French Revolution. I sent her the two Crash Course videos on the topic, told her to watch them over the weekend, and she came in Monday ready to join our discussion of the Reign of Terror. She didn’t have all the small details yet, but she had the big picture, and that’s all I needed. It’s still not perfect. I still cringe at how some topics are flattened to fit the 10-minute run time, I still remind my students that they can’t rely only on the videos for big exams. But it’s free, it’s accessible, and it meets kids where they are. I don’t think I’ll go back to teaching without it now.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Is Crash Course Good for Learning World History, US History, and Political Theory