Why Grades Often Measure Following Instructions More Than Actual Learning
Last month I sat across from Lila’s 7th grade science teacher at fall parent-teacher conferences, twisting a paper coffee cup in my lap while she slid my daughter’s grade summary across the table. B+ overall. I knew what was coming before she said it: Lila aces every unit test, can answer every extension question no other kid volunteers for, and built that working James Webb Space Telescope model for the science fair that’s still displayed by the office. But she loses 10 points almost every week for small procedural misses: forgetting to write her name in the top margin, skipping the extra credit vocabulary sentence requirement, turning in lab notes on loose paper instead of glued into her notebook. “She gets the material better than most A students in this class,” the teacher said. “The grade just reflects that she doesn’t check all the procedural boxes.”
That conversation got me asking questions I never had before: do grades actually measure how much a kid has learned, or just how well they follow instructions? That same week, I sat with Lila while she studied for her U.S. History midterm. The test was 40% multiple choice on dates of key events, 60% essay. Lila spent two nights reading a YA novel about the Dust Bowl I picked up at the library sale, and when we quizzed each other, she mixed up the start dates of the New Deal programs and couldn’t remember the exact year the stock market crashed. She got a B- on the test, but when I asked her last weekend to explain why so many families lost their homes in the 1930s, she connected it to the eviction crisis we saw during the pandemic, pointed out how the same patterns of bad lending were still happening, and even showed me a TikTok she’d saved from a historian talking about it. That’s learning, right? Way deeper than memorizing a date.
I used to think that any dip in grade meant my kid wasn’t putting in the work. I’d nag her about checking the rubric, making sure every box was ticked. But over the last two years, talking to other parents and a few teacher friends, I’ve started to see that most cumulative grades are a mix of two very different things: how well a kid knows the material, and how well they remember to follow every single rule the class has. A lot of the time, the compliance part takes up more of the grade than the actual learning part. One elementary teacher I know told me that in first grade, up to 30% of a kid’s reading grade can come from things like staying on the right page during group reading, raising their hand before speaking, and turning in their take-home folder every Friday. That’s not measuring reading ability. That’s measuring how well a 6-year-old follows directions.
It’s not that all grades are useless, of course. Test grades that only measure content understanding do tell you something about what a kid has mastered. The problem is that most final grades weigh all the small procedural stuff equally, or even more heavily, than the actual content. I’ve seen it with Lila’s friend Mia, who got a straight A in algebra last year. When Lila asked Mia for help with a basic equation last month, Mia couldn’t remember how to solve it. She’d memorized all the steps for the tests, turned in every homework assignment on time with the right formatting, got her A, and then dumped all the content a week after the final. That A didn’t measure learning. It measured how well Mia followed the class rules to get the grade.
I’ve started doing a few small, low-effort things that work for our family to untangle grades from actual learning. First, when I look at a report card or talk to a teacher, I split the grade in my head. At conferences, I now ask two specific questions instead of just “how is my kid doing?”: “How well does my kid understand the core concepts of this class?” and “How much of their current grade comes from things that don’t have to do with content, like homework completion or formatting?” That gives me a far clearer picture than a single letter ever can. Last conferences, Lila’s history teacher told me straight that 25% of the grade is just weekly homework completion, regardless of how accurate it is. That made that B- make a lot more sense.
Second, I added a 10-minute “teach me something” check-in once a month, no grades involved. I just ask Lila to pick one thing she learned recently that interested her, and teach it to me. If she can explain it, give an example, answer my silly questions, that’s real learning, full stop. Last month she taught me how craters form on the moon, drew a diagram on the back of my grocery list, and even did a little demonstration with flour and a marble. That told me more about her science learning than any B+ ever could.
Third, we pick our battles when it comes to compliance. Lila was losing 5 points off every single assignment for forgetting her name on the top. We put a big sticky note that says “NAME DATE PERIOD” on the front of her binder, so she just checks it before she turns anything in. That takes 10 seconds, no extra stress, and it’s already gotten her almost a full letter grade back without any extra work. But when it comes to things like writing three vocabulary sentences that she says don’t help her remember the words, we let that slide. That 10 points a week is a trade-off for the 20 extra minutes she gets to spend reading about astrophysics or drawing planets, which matters way more to her long-term learning.
It’s not a perfect system. I still stress sometimes, when I think about high school GPAs and college applications, about whether we’re doing the right thing by letting some of those small rules slide. Lila still comes home with grades that don’t match what I know she can do, and sometimes she gets frustrated that she works harder than some kids who get higher A’s just by turning in every stupid worksheet. But I’d rather she have a few lower grades and a real love of learning than a perfect GPA that comes from checking every box without actually engaging with the material. We’re still figuring it out, day by day. That’s good enough for now.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Grades Often Measure Following Instructions More Than Actual Learning