Militarized Math Problems for 8th Graders: Is It Acceptable in Democratic Classrooms?
Last Tuesday, I cleared spaghetti crumbs off our kitchen table and leaned over my 13-year-old Javi’s math homework, like I do most weeknights. He slumped back in his chair, kicked the leg of the table, and pushed the worksheet toward me. “Look at this. All of them are about the army. Why can’t they be about normal stuff?” I flipped the page, and he was right. First problem: “A platoon of 36 soldiers needs to cross a river for a 72-hour training mission. Small rafts hold 4 people for $20, large rafts hold 6 for $25. What’s the cheapest combination to get everyone across?” Next: “A missile silo requires 120 concrete blocks for reinforcement. Each supply truck can carry 17 blocks. How many full trips does the truck need to make?” The third was about counting rounds of ammo for a rifle training exercise.
I asked him if it bothered him beyond feeling weird. He shrugged and said it wasn’t giving him nightmares, but it stood out that out of 10 word problems that week, 4 were military-themed. The last time he’d solved a problem about a local community project was two weeks earlier, when they calculated how much mulch you need for the middle school garden.
I brought it up at 8th grade soccer carpool the next morning. Three other parents pulled out their phones to show me worksheets from their kids’ classes. One mom, Lina, whose 13-year-old son is a Syrian refugee who came to our country three years ago, said her son had a panic attack last month when a worksheet included a problem counting civilian casualties after a drone strike. The teacher swapped it out quickly after, but Lina said it brought up all the trauma they’d worked through in therapy over two years. Another dad said his district banned all uncontextualized military-themed word problems two years ago after a similar complaint, and now most problems center food, sports, or local community projects.
I brought the topic to our PTA meeting that Thursday. The principal said the curriculum came from the state board, and no one had ever really questioned the context of the word problems before. A math teacher sitting in the back added that she gets pre-made worksheets from the district, and she doesn’t have time to rewrite every problem between grading 120 papers a week and chaperoning after-school dances. That makes sense—teachers are overloaded, and this isn’t something most people think to flag. But it got me thinking: how acceptable is this default, really, in a democratic country where we’re supposed to teach kids to think critically about what our society prioritizes?
A lot of people will say it’s just a math problem. The numbers are what matter, the context is just decoration to make it relatable. But that’s not true. We use “real-world” word problems to show kids why math matters. If the most common real-world context we reach for is the military, that sends a quiet message that military work is more important, more central to our country, than teaching, nursing, green energy, or small business. 8th graders are just starting to form their ideas about citizenship and what our country stands for. They pick up on those messages even if they can’t name them.
It’s not that military contexts never have a place. If an 8th grade social studies class is doing a unit on the federal budget, and the math class pairs that with a word problem calculating what percentage of federal spending goes to the military versus public education and healthcare, that’s useful. That encourages critical thinking, which is exactly what democracy needs from its young people. The problem is when random, uncontextualized military word problems are just dropped into regular homework, with no discussion, and no alternative for kids who’ve experienced war first-hand.
After the PTA meeting, a small group of us worked with a few math teachers to come up with small, low-effort changes that don’t add extra work to anyone’s plate. First, we asked that any worksheet with military-themed problems add a 1-sentence note at the top: “If this topic upsets you, please ask me for an alternate worksheet with the exact same math.” That takes 10 seconds to add to a digital worksheet. Second, we suggested that when teachers have a free minute, they swap out context for recurring problems—changing 36 soldiers to 36 campers, changing a missile silo to a community garden shed. Same numbers, same math, no extra grading work, just a 2-minute edit. Third, we asked the curriculum committee to do a quick audit of how many military-themed problems are in our textbooks compared to other common contexts. When I counted Javi’s textbook last month, 12 of 72 word problems from the first semester were military-themed. Only 3 were about renewable energy, and 2 were about public education. That’s a lopsided default that doesn’t reflect what most 8th graders will actually do with their lives.
For me, the acceptability question comes down to neutrality. People say it’s just a math problem, it’s neutral. But it’s not neutral to center military institutions over every other part of society in a democracy. It’s not neutral to ask kids who’ve survived war to do math problems about war in their daily homework. That’s a choice curriculum writers made, and we can choose differently.
Last week, Javi brought home a new worksheet. The river crossing problem was still there, but instead of 36 soldiers, it was 36 8th graders going to a summer camp on the other side of the river. He pointed it out to me and grinned. “See? That’s way better. Now I can actually picture that.” We still have a long way to go. The curriculum audit isn’t done, and some parents still say we’re overreacting, that it’s just a word problem. I get that it’s not the biggest issue facing our schools right now. But small messages add up. For the kid who’s had to run from bombs, and for every kid learning what our democracy values, those small changes matter. We’re just taking it one word problem at a time.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Militarized Math Problems for 8th Graders: Is It Acceptable in Democratic Classrooms