Why Some Games Feel Like Playtime—And Others Feel Like School
You’ve probably spent hours jumping over pits in Super Mario Bros. or solving math puzzles in Prodigy. Both are games, but they leave you with very different experiences. One feels like pure fun; the other feels like learning disguised as fun. So what makes games like Mario fundamentally different from educational titles like Prodigy? Let’s break it down.
1. The Core Goal: Entertainment vs. Learning
When you play a classic game like Mario, the primary objective is straightforward: have fun. The game rewards you for stomping Goombas, collecting coins, and rescuing Princess Peach. Every level is designed to challenge your reflexes, timing, and creativity, but there’s no hidden agenda. You’re not expected to walk away with new skills or knowledge—just a sense of accomplishment (and maybe a higher score).
Educational games like Prodigy, on the other hand, are built with a dual purpose. Sure, they include colorful characters, quests, and rewards, but their mechanics are carefully crafted to teach specific subjects—math, in Prodigy’s case. Every battle against a fantasy creature requires solving equations, and progressing through the game depends on mastering grade-level math concepts. The fun is a vehicle for learning, not the end goal.
2. How Players Interact: Skill vs. Knowledge
In Mario, success hinges on physical skills: precise button presses, quick reactions, and spatial awareness. If you mistime a jump, you fall into a pit. If you’re too slow, a Hammer Bro takes you out. The game tests your ability to adapt to challenges in real time, relying on muscle memory and instinct.
Prodigy flips this dynamic. While it includes exploration and combat, your progress depends on cognitive skills—specifically, solving math problems. Battles aren’t won by rapid button mashing but by correctly answering questions. This shifts the focus from hand-eye coordination to critical thinking. For example, defeating a fire-breathing monster might require calculating the area of a shape or simplifying fractions.
3. Content Design: Freedom vs. Structure
Traditional games often prioritize open-ended exploration. In Mario, you can choose different paths, discover secret shortcuts, or replay levels to improve your time. The structure is flexible, allowing players to define their own goals (like collecting every coin or unlocking hidden characters).
Educational games tend to be more guided. Prodigy’s storyline and quests align with curriculum standards, and the difficulty adjusts based on the player’s performance. While there’s still room for exploration, the game’s content is deliberately scaffolded to build knowledge step-by-step. You won’t face algebra problems in first grade or multiplication before mastering addition.
4. Feedback Systems: Instant Gratification vs. Long-Term Growth
Mario showers players with immediate rewards: the ding of collecting a coin, the fanfare after clearing a level, or the thrill of discovering a warp zone. These micro-rewards keep players engaged in the moment.
Prodigy uses a different strategy. While it includes instant feedback (e.g., “Correct!” or “Try again!”), its rewards are often tied to long-term progress. Unlocking new spells, pets, or areas depends on consistently solving problems correctly. Teachers and parents can also track a child’s growth through performance reports, shifting the focus from short-term wins to measurable improvement over time.
5. The Role of Failure
In Mario, failure is part of the fun. Losing a life or falling into a lava pit feels frustrating, but it’s also a chance to try again with new strategies. The stakes are low, and mistakes don’t carry consequences beyond restarting a level.
Educational games handle failure more delicately. If a player answers incorrectly in Prodigy, the game typically offers hints or adjusts the difficulty to avoid discouragement. The goal is to create a safe space for trial and error, where mistakes are framed as learning opportunities rather than setbacks.
6. Retention of Skills: What Sticks?
After playing Mario, you might remember level layouts or boss patterns, but these skills don’t translate to real-world tasks. The game’s impact is mostly emotional—nostalgia, excitement, or the satisfaction of beating a tough level.
With educational games, the intended takeaway is practical knowledge. A child who plays Prodigy regularly will (ideally) improve their math fluency, which applies directly to homework and tests. Studies suggest that gamified learning can increase retention because it engages multiple parts of the brain—combining logic with storytelling and visual cues.
The Bigger Picture: Why Both Matter
It’s not that one type of game is “better” than the other. Mario-style games remind us that play is essential for creativity and stress relief, while Prodigy demonstrates how games can make learning engaging for reluctant students. The key difference lies in their DNA: one prioritizes joy, the other bridges joy and growth.
Interestingly, the line between these categories is blurring. Many modern games blend entertainment and education—think of Minecraft’s classroom editions or historical accuracy in games like Assassin’s Creed. As technology evolves, we’ll likely see more hybrids that prove learning and fun don’t have to be opposites.
So next time you pick up a controller, ask yourself: Am I here to unwind, to grow, or maybe a little of both? Either way, there’s a game for that.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Some Games Feel Like Playtime—And Others Feel Like School