Why It’s Time to Move Shakespeare Off the Required Reading List
Let’s talk about the elephant in the English classroom: Shakespeare. For generations, his plays and sonnets have been treated as non-negotiable pillars of literary education. Students groan, teachers meticulously plan decoding sessions, and everyone generally accepts that wrestling with “wherefore art thou” is just part of the schooling ritual. But what if this tradition is holding us back more than it’s enlightening us? It might be time to seriously reconsider why we insist on teaching Shakespearean texts and language as mandatory curriculum.
The Case Against the Bard’s Mandate
1. The Accessibility Abyss: Let’s be brutally honest. Early Modern English, with its archaic vocabulary (“anon,” “thou,” “hither”), complex sentence structures, and obsolete cultural references, creates a massive barrier for the vast majority of students. Hours are spent simply translating lines into comprehensible modern English, leaving precious little time for genuine literary analysis, thematic exploration, or character development. The frustration of grappling with the language often overshadows any potential appreciation for the story or its themes. Is mastering Elizabethan syntax truly the most valuable use of limited classroom time?
2. Relevance Lost in Translation? Shakespeare tackled timeless themes: love, power, jealousy, ambition, betrayal. Absolutely. But the context in which these themes are explored – rigid feudal hierarchies, duels of honor, magical potions, extreme gender roles – feels increasingly alien to a 21st-century teenager navigating social media, climate anxiety, and rapidly evolving societal norms. While parallels can be drawn, they often feel forced. Students struggle to connect Hamlet’s existential crisis or Romeo’s impetuousness to their own lived experiences in a meaningful way. Contemporary literature and media often explore these same universal struggles in settings and language that resonate immediately and powerfully.
3. The Myth of Cultural Universality: The Western literary canon, crowned by Shakespeare, has long been presented as the pinnacle of human cultural achievement. This perspective, however, is deeply Eurocentric. Insisting on Shakespeare as the essential literary experience marginalizes the rich tapestry of global literature. Students from diverse backgrounds rarely see their own cultural heritage or perspectives reflected in these mandatory texts. Prioritizing Shakespeare perpetuates the idea that certain cultures and voices are inherently more worthy of study than others, reinforcing outdated hierarchies rather than fostering genuine inclusivity and global understanding. Shouldn’t our reading lists reflect the vibrant diversity of human storytelling?
4. Opportunity Cost: What Aren’t We Reading? Every hour spent deciphering “Macbeth” or “Julius Caesar” is an hour not spent engaging with:
Powerful Modern Voices: Authors like Toni Morrison, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Mohsin Hamid, Sandra Cisneros, or George Orwell offer searing explorations of contemporary issues – racism, migration, identity, totalitarianism – in language that speaks directly to students.
Diverse Global Perspectives: Literature from Africa, Asia, Latin America, and indigenous cultures offers invaluable insights into different ways of being and understanding the world.
Critical Media Literacy: In a world saturated with digital media, teaching students to critically analyze news, social media, film, and advertising is arguably more crucial than ever.
Contemporary Playwrights & Storytellers: Works exploring current social dynamics, technology’s impact, and modern relationships often connect far more effectively. Think of the raw honesty in plays by Lynn Nottage, or the sharp social commentary in Aaron Sorkin’s screenplays.
Beyond Abandonment: A More Nuanced Approach
This isn’t a call to “cancel” Shakespeare or banish his works from libraries. His influence on the English language and Western drama is undeniable and fascinating – for those who choose to delve into it. The argument is against mandating his texts as the cornerstone of literary education for every single student.
Here’s what a shift could look like:
Electives, Not Requirements: Offer rich, in-depth Shakespeare courses for students genuinely interested in historical literature, theatre, or linguistics. Let them explore the depth without forcing others through the frustration barrier.
Contextualizing, Not Centering: If included in broader surveys, present Shakespeare as one significant voice in literary history, alongside others from his time and beyond. Focus on his cultural impact and influence, perhaps comparing adaptations.
Modern Adaptations as Entry Points: Use film adaptations (“10 Things I Hate About You” for “Taming of the Shrew”), graphic novels, or modern-language paraphrases to introduce plots and themes before tackling the original text, or even as a substitute where the original language is the primary obstacle.
Focus on Themes & Connections: When studying Shakespeare, prioritize thematic exploration and drawing connections to modern situations over exhaustive line-by-line translation. What does “Othello” say about jealousy and manipulation that we see online today?
Curriculum Centered on Relevance & Diversity: Build core reading lists around texts that reflect diverse experiences, tackle contemporary issues, and utilize language accessible to modern students. Ensure voices from marginalized communities and different global traditions are prominently featured and analyzed with the same rigor traditionally reserved for the Bard.
The Goal: Fostering Lifelong Readers and Critical Thinkers
The ultimate aim of English education shouldn’t be to produce students who can quote Hamlet’s soliloquy (impressive as that may be). It should be to nurture critical thinkers, empathetic individuals, and – crucially – readers who find joy and value in engaging with stories and ideas. When the primary experience of “literature” in school is a frustrating, often alienating struggle with archaic language, we risk turning students off reading altogether.
By moving Shakespeare off the mandatory pedestal and embracing a more diverse, relevant, and accessible curriculum, we create space for students to encounter stories that truly speak to them. We empower them to see their world reflected in literature and to engage meaningfully with a wider range of human experiences. It’s not about diminishing Shakespeare’s legacy; it’s about expanding the horizons of literary education to be more inclusive, engaging, and ultimately, more effective for all students in the world they actually inhabit. The future of literature in our classrooms deserves to be as dynamic and multifaceted as the world outside.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why It’s Time to Move Shakespeare Off the Required Reading List