Why Has Advertising to Children Become the New Normal?
Picture this: A six-year-old sits cross-legged in front of a tablet, giggling at a cartoon character who pauses mid-episode to hold up a sugary cereal box. The child turns to their parent and says, “Can we get this? It looks so fun!” This scenario isn’t rare—it’s everyday life in a world where advertising to children is not just common but expected. Yet, when did society collectively decide that targeting kids with marketing campaigns was acceptable? And why do so few people question it?
The Evolution of Child-Targeted Ads
Advertising to children isn’t new. In the 1950s, toy commercials dominated Saturday morning TV slots, and sugary snacks were pitched as part of a “balanced breakfast.” But back then, ads had limits—they were confined to specific times and platforms. Today, screens are everywhere, and ads follow kids from YouTube videos to educational apps. The line between entertainment and advertising has blurred, making it harder for children (and parents) to recognize when they’re being sold to.
What changed? For starters, the rise of digital platforms turned children into a lucrative demographic. Kids influence household spending (ever heard of “pester power”?), and their brand loyalty, if captured early, can last decades. Advertisers know this. They’ve mastered algorithms to deliver personalized content, turning playtime into a data-gathering opportunity.
Why Don’t We Push Back More?
If ads targeting children are so pervasive, why isn’t there more outrage? Several factors explain society’s uneasy acceptance:
1. “It’s Just Business” Mentality
Advertising is often seen as a neutral tool—a way for companies to share information. Critics argue that banning child-focused ads would stifle free markets. After all, toys, games, and snacks are designed for kids, so why shouldn’t they be marketed to them? This logic normalizes the idea that children are “mini consumers,” shaping cultural attitudes over time.
2. Regulatory Gray Areas
Many countries have weak regulations around advertising to children. For example, the U.S. has no federal laws restricting such ads, relying instead on vague industry guidelines. Without strict rules, companies test boundaries, using tactics like cartoon mascots or influencer partnerships to bypass parental oversight. When regulation feels toothless, resignation sets in.
3. The Convenience Trap
Modern parenting is exhausting. Screens keep kids occupied, and parents often don’t have the bandwidth to vet every app or video. Advertisers exploit this fatigue by embedding ads in “free” content, making resistance feel like a losing battle. Over time, parents may shrug and think, “Well, everyone else allows it.”
4. Normalization Through Nostalgia
Adults who grew up with Saturday morning commercials often view child-targeted ads as harmless. They think, “I turned out fine!” This nostalgia glosses over how today’s ads are more sophisticated, interactive, and data-driven. What felt like innocent fun in the 1990s is now a hyper-personalized psychological nudge.
The Hidden Costs of “Acceptable” Advertising
While society tolerates child-focused ads, the consequences are mounting. Studies link excessive screen time and ad exposure to shorter attention spans, materialism, and unhealthy habits. For example, a 2022 study found that kids exposed to food ads were 30% more likely to choose sugary snacks over fruits. Ads also shape values: When products are tied to popularity or happiness, children internalize the idea that self-worth comes from what they own.
Parents aren’t the only ones struggling. Schools and educators report challenges when students bring consumerist mindsets into classrooms—like arguing over who has the “coolest” branded backpack. Meanwhile, child development experts warn that constant advertising undermines creativity, replacing imaginative play with scripted brand interactions.
Rethinking Our Silent Agreement
The acceptance of advertising to children isn’t inevitable—it’s a choice. Here’s how society could recalibrate:
– Demand Transparency
Require platforms to clearly label ads and sponsorships, even in kid-friendly content. For example, YouTube Kids could enforce stricter separations between shows and promotions.
– Strengthen Regulations
Countries like Norway and Sweden ban ads targeting children under 12. Similar policies, combined with penalties for violations, could reduce exploitative practices.
– Educate Families and Kids
Media literacy programs can teach children to recognize ads and question their messages. Parents also need resources to manage screen time and discuss consumerism with kids.
– Pressure Brands to Do Better
Public backlash has pushed some companies to abandon harmful marketing tactics (e.g., tobacco ads). Holding brands accountable for targeting kids could drive ethical changes.
Final Thoughts
Advertising to children persists not because it’s harmless but because it’s profitable—and because addressing it requires effort. But the stakes are too high to stay complacent. Kids today are growing up in a world where their interests, attention, and values are commodified before they can even spell “advertisement.” The question isn’t just why we’ve accepted this reality, but what we’re willing to do to change it.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Has Advertising to Children Become the New Normal