Why Do People Have Such Wildly Different Opinions About School?
Let’s talk about something everyone has an opinion on: school. For some, it’s a nostalgic playground of friendship, structure, and discovery. For others, it’s a soul-crushing grind that leaves scars well into adulthood. You’ve probably heard the argument before: “School sucks. The only people who like it had perfect childhoods and never faced real problems.” Meanwhile, those who enjoyed their school years get labeled as “basic” or “NPCs”—shallow characters following a script. But is this divide really that simple? Let’s unpack why people feel so strongly about this topic and what it says about education, trauma, and societal expectations.
—
The “Good Ass Childhood” Theory: Why Some People Thrive in School
First, let’s address the elephant in the room. Yes, many people who loved school did have stable, supportive upbringings. Think about it: if your home life was predictable, your parents were emotionally available, and you never worried about food or safety, school might’ve felt like a natural extension of that security. You showed up, followed the rules, earned praise for good grades, and built friendships without underlying stress. For these individuals, school wasn’t just a place to learn—it was a social hub, a confidence-builder, and a launchpad for future opportunities.
But here’s the catch: enjoying school doesn’t automatically make someone naive or oblivious to hardship. Many students who excelled academically still faced challenges—family issues, identity struggles, or societal pressures—but found solace in the structure of school. The classroom became a refuge, not a prison. Labeling these folks as “NPCs” oversimplifies their experiences. After all, humans are complex. Just because someone fit into the system doesn’t mean they’re robotic or incapable of critical thought.
—
When School Actually Sucks: Trauma, Inequality, and the System’s Flaws
Now, let’s flip the script. For countless others, school was a battlefield. Maybe they dealt with bullying, undiagnosed learning disabilities, or teachers who dismissed their potential. Maybe they came from unstable homes where homework wasn’t a priority, or they worked part-time jobs to support their families. For these students, school wasn’t a sanctuary—it was a reminder of everything stacked against them.
The education system often fails to accommodate neurodivergent learners, creative thinkers, or anyone who doesn’t thrive in a rigid, standardized environment. A kid who’s brilliant at fixing cars but struggles with algebra might internalize the message that they’re “dumb.” A student processing trauma at home might be labeled “lazy” for missing assignments. When your basic needs aren’t met—food, safety, emotional support—memorizing the periodic table feels irrelevant.
This is where the frustration toward “school lovers” comes from. To someone who fought just to survive the system, the idea of enjoying school can feel like a privilege reserved for those who never had to claw their way through it.
—
NPCs or Free Thinkers? The Problem With Labeling
Calling people “NPCs” (non-player characters, for those unfamiliar with gaming slang) implies they’re passive participants in life—robots following a script written by society. But this mindset is reductive. Everyone navigates systems, whether it’s school, work, or social norms. Some people conform because it benefits them; others rebel because the system doesn’t serve their needs. Neither approach is inherently superior.
The truth is, the education system does reward certain behaviors: obedience, memorization, and adherence to deadlines. Students who master these skills early often succeed within the framework. But this doesn’t make them mindless drones. Many “rule followers” grow up to challenge the very systems they excelled in, using their platform to advocate for change. Conversely, some rebels who hated school later find comfort in structure as adults. Life isn’t black-and-white—and neither are people.
—
Why Can’t We Fix This? The Root of the Education Debate
The real issue isn’t whether school is inherently good or bad. It’s that the system was designed for a one-size-fits-all world that no longer exists. Traditional education prioritizes industrial-era skills over critical thinking, emotional intelligence, or practical life skills. It’s great at producing employees who can follow instructions but less effective at nurturing innovators, artists, or problem-solvers.
Meanwhile, societal pressure ties self-worth to academic achievement. Kids learn quickly that their value is measured by report cards and college acceptances. This creates a toxic cycle: students who succeed feel validated; those who struggle feel worthless. No wonder the debate gets heated—school becomes a proxy for deeper insecurities about belonging and purpose.
—
Moving Beyond the School Sucks vs. School Rocks Divide
So, how do we bridge this gap? First, acknowledge that both perspectives are valid. Someone’s positive experience doesn’t negate another’s trauma, and vice versa. Second, push for systemic changes: smaller class sizes, mental health resources, and curricula that value creativity as much as test scores. Finally, let’s stop using school as a measuring stick for human worth.
Life isn’t a graded assignment. Some people bloom in structured environments; others thrive when they carve their own path. The goal shouldn’t be to convince everyone to love or hate school but to create a world where education adapts to people—not the other way around.
Whether you’re a valedictorian with fond memories or a dropout who still cringes at the sound of a bell ringing, your experience matters. Let’s stop reducing each other to stereotypes and start asking: What can we learn from these stories to build something better?
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Do People Have Such Wildly Different Opinions About School