Why Do Academics Keep Saying “Yes” to Extra Work Without a Raise or Promotion?
Picture this: A professor agrees to chair a new diversity committee. A lab manager starts mentoring undergraduates outside their job description. A department administrator takes on event planning for an international conference—all without a salary bump, title change, or formal recognition. Scenarios like these are surprisingly common in higher education. But why do so many people in academia willingly accept added responsibilities that don’t translate to immediate rewards? Let’s unpack the motivations, risks, and long-term implications of saying “yes” when logic might suggest saying “no.”
The Hidden Currency of Academic Roles
In many professions, taking on extra work without compensation might seem irrational. But higher education operates on a unique value system. For starters, academia thrives on collaboration and intellectual exchange. Volunteering for committees, mentoring students, or organizing workshops often aligns with personal values—like fostering inclusivity or advancing research—that transcend financial incentives.
Dr. Sarah Thompson, a tenured biology professor, shares her perspective: “When I joined the sustainability task force, I knew it wouldn’t boost my paycheck. But it connected me with researchers across disciplines, opened doors for grant collaborations, and gave me a voice in shaping campus policies I care about.” For many like Sarah, non-monetary benefits—networking, skill diversification, and influence—act as a form of “career capital” that pays off indirectly.
Skill Development in Disguise
Extra responsibilities often serve as stealthy training grounds. A faculty member leading a curriculum redesign project hones leadership and project management skills. An advisor coordinating study-abroad programs gains insights into global education trends. These experiences build resumes in ways that traditional job descriptions don’t capture.
Graduate students and early-career professionals, in particular, leverage unpaid opportunities to stand out. “Helping organize a symposium introduced me to keynote speakers who later became references for job applications,” says Michael Chen, now a postdoctoral researcher. “It also taught me how to negotiate budgets and market events—skills my peers hadn’t developed yet.”
The Tenure-Track Tightrope
For those seeking tenure or promotions, visibility matters. Serving on high-impact committees or spearheading initiatives can signal commitment to institutional goals. However, this creates a double-edged sword. Junior faculty may feel pressured to overcommit to prove their dedication, risking burnout. As one anonymous Reddit user in academia lamented, “I said ‘yes’ to everything for three years. By the time I earned tenure, I was too exhausted to enjoy it.”
Administrators aren’t immune either. A registrar who volunteers to digitize records for an understaffed department might improve operational efficiency but could inadvertently set unsustainable expectations. “Once you demonstrate capability, the workload tends to snowball,” notes a dean at a midwestern university.
When “Yes” Becomes Exploitation
Not all extra tasks are created equal. While some opportunities foster growth, others exploit goodwill. For example, adjunct professors frequently face “scope creep”—teaching extra classes or advising student groups without additional pay—due to the precarious nature of their contracts. Similarly, staff in underfunded public universities may inherit responsibilities from eliminated positions, blurring the line between dedication and overwork.
The emotional labor involved also goes unnoticed. Counseling students through crises, mediating departmental conflicts, or advocating for marginalized groups can drain energy without formal acknowledgment. As higher education grapples with mental health crises among staff and faculty, the toll of invisible labor is gaining attention.
Strategic Volunteering: How to Choose Wisely
So how can academics navigate this landscape without burning out? Here are three practical strategies:
1. Align Tasks With Long-Term Goals
Ask: Does this role offer skills, connections, or visibility that align with my career trajectory? If mentoring aligns with your passion for teaching, go for it. If organizing a newsletter doesn’t move the needle, politely decline.
2. Set Boundaries Early
Clarify time commitments upfront. For example: “I can dedicate five hours a week to this committee for one semester.” This prevents mission creep and preserves bandwidth for high-priority work.
3. Document and Advocate
Keep a record of contributions, especially those beyond your job description. During performance reviews or salary negotiations, use this data to demonstrate your value. As one department chair advises, “If you don’t quantify your impact, others won’t.”
The Bigger Picture: Institutional Responsibility
While individuals can adopt smarter strategies, institutions must also address systemic issues. Transparent workload policies, clearer pathways for recognition, and mental health resources are critical. Some universities now include “service contributions” in promotion criteria or offer professional development credits for voluntary roles. Others use workload calculators to ensure equity.
Ultimately, the culture of “quiet overachievement” in higher education won’t change overnight. But by valuing both individual agency and systemic fairness, academia can transform unpaid labor from a hidden tax into a sustainable investment—for everyone involved.
Final Thoughts
Saying “yes” to extra work in higher education isn’t inherently good or bad—it’s about making intentional choices. Whether you’re driven by passion, strategy, or necessity, understanding the trade-offs empowers you to navigate this complex terrain. After all, in a field built on knowledge and community, every task accepted (or declined) shapes not just your career, but the future of education itself.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » Why Do Academics Keep Saying “Yes” to Extra Work Without a Raise or Promotion