When Your Crown Becomes a Controversy: Navigating Natural Hair Bias
You wake up one morning, twist your curls into a bold afro, and head to work feeling like your most authentic self—only to be called into your supervisor’s office. “Your hairstyle isn’t professional,” they say. Sound familiar? Stories like this aren’t just isolated incidents; they’re part of a broader pattern where natural Black hair becomes a battleground for respect, identity, and fairness.
Let’s start with a story that went viral in 2020. A high school student in Texas was told her braided extensions violated the school’s dress code. Administrators claimed her hair “distracted others,” even though similar styles were worn by peers without consequence. When her family pushed back, the school doubled down, igniting protests and national media attention. This isn’t just about hair—it’s about systemic biases that equate Eurocentric beauty standards with professionalism and appropriateness.
Historically, textured hair has been weaponized to marginalize Black individuals. During slavery, hair coverings were enforced to dehumanize enslaved people. In the 20th century, “grooming policies” in workplaces and schools pressured Black women to chemically straighten or heat-style their hair to conform. Today, these biases persist under coded language: “unkempt,” “too urban,” or “unprofessional.” A 2019 study found that Black women are 1.5 times more likely to be sent home from work because of their hair and 80% more likely to feel pressured to alter their natural texture to fit in.
The good news? Legal protections are growing. The CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair), passed in 13 U.S. states so far, bans discrimination based on hair texture or protective styles like braids, locs, and twists. High-profile cases, like the $1.1 million settlement awarded to a Alabama woman fired for refusing to cut her locs, signal shifting attitudes. But legislation alone won’t fix deeply rooted cultural norms.
So, what can you do if you’re penalized for wearing your natural hair? First, document everything. If a supervisor or teacher criticizes your style, ask for specific reasons in writing. Phrases like “distracting” or “messy” are often subjective—and potentially discriminatory. Next, know your rights. Research local laws: Does your state have the CROWN Act? Even in areas without explicit protections, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act may apply if policies disproportionately impact racial groups.
When addressing the issue, frame the conversation around inclusion. For example: “I want to ensure my workplace/school values diversity. My hair is part of my cultural identity, and altering it would compromise my authenticity.” If met with resistance, consider escalating the matter to HR, a union rep, or civil rights organizations like the NAACP.
But advocacy isn’t just personal—it’s collective. Share your story on social media (using hashtags like CROWNAct or FreeTheHair), support Black-owned hair care brands, and amplify campaigns pushing for policy changes. Education is key, too. Host workshops explaining why natural hair matters: For many, it’s a reclamation of heritage and a rejection of beauty standards rooted in colonialism.
Some institutions are getting it right. Take LinkedIn, which recently added “Black hair” and “protective styles” to its photo guidelines after backlash over removed profile pictures. Or the U.S. Army, which revised its grooming policies in 2021 to include braids and locs. Progress is slow but happening.
At its core, the natural hair movement isn’t just about aesthetics—it’s about dignity. When society polices Black hair, it sends a message that our bodies must be controlled to be deemed acceptable. Pushing back isn’t “making a fuss”; it’s affirming that our existence isn’t up for debate.
So, the next time someone questions your crown, remember: Your hair is a testament to resilience, creativity, and cultural pride. And no policy or prejudiced opinion can take that away.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Your Crown Becomes a Controversy: Navigating Natural Hair Bias