When Substitute Teachers Play by Different Rules: A Student’s Perspective on Classroom Justice
Let me paint you a picture: It’s a typical Tuesday morning. You’re sitting in math class, half-listening to a lesson you’ve heard three times already this semester, when the door swings open. In walks a substitute teacher—a fresh face with a clipboard and a stern expression. By lunchtime, you’re staring at a detention slip for a “violation” that every other teacher in the building has casually ignored all year. Sound familiar?
This exact scenario happened to me last month. While my regular teachers seemed perfectly fine with my habit of doodling in the margins of my notebook during lectures, the substitute that day decided it was a punishable offense. Suddenly, my harmless sketches became a one-way ticket to after-school detention. Frustrating? Absolutely. But it also sparked a bigger conversation about fairness, consistency, and how temporary authority figures can reshape classroom dynamics overnight.
The Substitute Teacher Paradox
Substitute teachers occupy a unique space in schools. They’re tasked with maintaining order but often lack the rapport regular teachers build with students over time. Without context about classroom culture or individual student habits, substitutes frequently default to rigid rule enforcement. In my case, the substitute interpreted my doodling as “disruption,” even though it’s a coping mechanism I’ve used for years to stay focused. My regular teachers know this—they’ve even praised my ability to multitask. But to a substitute, it looked like defiance.
This disconnect isn’t just about doodling. I’ve seen classmates get reprimanded for leaning back in chairs, whispering about assignments, or even wearing hoodies indoors—all things that full-time staff tolerate within reason. The issue isn’t necessarily that substitutes are “stricter”; it’s that they’re working with incomplete information. Without understanding the unspoken agreements between students and their usual teachers, substitutes often enforce rules by the book, not by the classroom.
Why Consistency Matters (and Why It’s So Hard)
Schools thrive on routine. When rules change depending on who’s enforcing them, it creates confusion and resentment. Imagine if traffic laws shifted daily based on which police officer pulled you over. You’d never feel secure behind the wheel. Similarly, students need predictable boundaries to trust the system.
But consistency is tricky. Substitute teachers aren’t mind readers. They don’t know that Mrs. Johnson lets us chew gum during tests because it reduces anxiety, or that Mr. Rodriguez turns a blind eye to late homework during basketball season. These unwritten policies exist because full-time teachers adapt rules to support student well-being. Substitutes, however, are often left with generic guidelines like “no cell phones” or “stay seated,” which don’t account for nuance.
Navigating the Power Gap
So, what can students do when a substitute’s interpretation of the rules feels unfair? Here’s what I learned from my detention debacle:
1. Stay Calm in the Moment
Arguing with a substitute rarely ends well. Even if you’re right, challenging their authority publicly often escalates the situation. Instead, take a breath and comply respectfully. You can address the issue later with a trusted adult.
2. Document What Happened
Write down the details while they’re fresh: what rule was cited, how other teachers typically handle the situation, and whether classmates witnessed the interaction. This creates a clear record if you need to appeal the punishment.
3. Talk to Your Regular Teacher
Most teachers want to know if their substitutes are causing friction. Mine was shocked to hear about the detention and apologized for not briefing the substitute on classroom norms. She even reached out to the administration to clarify expectations for future subs.
4. Use It as a Learning Opportunity
While frustrating, these moments teach adaptability. In college or careers, we’ll encounter bosses, professors, or clients with different standards. Learning to adjust while advocating for ourselves is a vital life skill.
The Bigger Picture: Rethinking Substitute Training
My experience made me wonder: Could better substitute teacher training prevent these clashes? Many districts hand substitutes a lesson plan and a list of rules without context about classroom culture. What if schools provided substitutes with brief profiles of each class? A simple note like, “This group works best with light music during independent study” or “Avoid calling on Student X unless they raise their hand—they have social anxiety” could bridge the gap.
Students could even contribute to these profiles anonymously at the start of the year. It would empower us to communicate our needs while helping substitutes understand the “why” behind certain exceptions.
Final Thoughts: Finding Common Ground
Getting detention over something trivial stings, especially when it feels like a power trip. But it’s worth remembering that substitutes are navigating unfamiliar territory too. They’re trying to do their jobs in chaotic environments, often without support. By advocating for clearer communication between students, teachers, and substitutes, we can create classrooms where everyone feels respected—no matter who’s running the show that day.
In the end, my detention slip became a funny story to share (once the annoyance faded). But it also reminded me that fairness isn’t just about following rules—it’s about understanding the humans behind them.
Please indicate: Thinking In Educating » When Substitute Teachers Play by Different Rules: A Student’s Perspective on Classroom Justice